Wednesday 5 February 2014

China has already been coping with an outbreak of a similar influenza virus called H7N9

New strain of 'deadly' bird flu


Avian influenzaExperts are concerned that the virus could mutate to spread far and wide

Related Stories

Experts are concerned about the spread of a new strain of bird flu that has already killed one woman in China.
The 73-year-old from Nanchang City caught the H10N8 virus after visiting a live poultry market, although it is not known for sure if this was the source of infection.
A second person has since become infected in China's Jiangxi province.
Scientists told The Lancet the potential for it to become a pandemic "should not be underestimated".

Start Quote

Previously we did not think that H7N9 infections might be so lethal. Now we also must consider H10N8 infections as well”
Dr John McCauleyDirector of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Influenza
This particular strain of influenza A virus has not been seen before.
In recent months, China has already been coping with an outbreak of a similar influenza virus called H7N9, which has killed around a quarter of those infected.
Pandemic risk
Scientists who have studied the new H10N8 virus say it has evolved some genetic characteristics that may allow it to replicate efficiently in humans.
The concern is that it could ultimately be able to spread from person to person, although experts stress that there is no evidence of this yet.
Dr Mingbin Liu from Nanchang City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention said: "A second case of H10N8 was identified in Jiangxi province, China, on 26 January 2014. This is of great concern because it reveals that the H10N8 virus has continued to circulate and may cause more human infections in future."
Ducks at poultry marketExperts believe the source of infection may have been contaminated poultry at a market
Dr Linda Klavinskis, senior lecturer in immunobiology at King's College London, said there was no immediate threat.

Bird flu

  • Bird flu or avian influenza is an infectious disease of birds caused by type A strains of the influenza virus
  • These viruses do not normally infect humans, but some particularly virulent strains, such as H10N8, can and will
  • In most cases, the people infected had been in close contact with infected poultry or with objects contaminated by their faeces
  • There is concern that the virus could mutate to become more easily transmissible between humans, raising the possibility of an influenza pandemic
Dr John McCauley, director of the WHO[World Health Organization] Collaborating Centre for Influenza, MRC [Medical Research Council] National Institute for Medical Research, said: "The potential epidemiological significance of this zoonotic infection is not clear. Avian influenza viruses of the sub-type H10N8 are probably not particularly unusual. Whether there were complications in this case is unclear.
"This case reminds us to be aware of human infections from animal influenza viruses, like the H7N9 cases in China which increase daily. Previously we did not think that H7N9 infections might be so lethal. Now we also must consider H10N8 infections as well."
Dr Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said: "We should always be worried when viruses cross the species barrier from birds or animals to humans as it is very unlikely that we will have prior immunity to protect us.
"We should be especially worried when those viruses show characteristics that suggest they have the capacity to replicate easily or to be virulent or resistant to drugs. This virus ticks several of these boxes and therefore is a cause for concern."
Are you in China? Or have you recently visited? How concerned are you about the spread of the virus? Send us your comments using the form below.

Tuesday 4 February 2014

NHS web page error sent users to malicious websites

NHS signHundreds of pages on the NHS site were affected

Related Stories

A "coding error" on the NHS website exposed users to harmful websites rather than health advice.
More than 800 pages on NHS.uk automatically redirected unsuspecting users to pages that contain either malware or advertising.
In a statement, the NHS said its site had not been maliciously attacked and that it had fixed the problem.
"An internal coding error has caused an incorrect redirect on some pages on NHS Choices since Sunday evening," a statement explained.
"Routine security checks alerted us to this problem on Monday morning at which point we identified the problem and corrected the code."
Typo blamed
Reddit user Muzzers said he had stumbled across an infected page while he had been browsing for information about the flu.
"Digging a bit deeper I found hundreds more pages which redirect to either an advertisement or malware infested page," he wrote.
Users trying to find details on dementia, pregnancy, vaccinations, mental health and other areas also found themselves sent to the malicious pages.
The fault occurred due to a typo within the NHS website's source code.
A developer accidentally wrote "googleaspis.com" rather than "googleapis.com" when creating the site.
The mistake went unnoticed until the incorrectly-spelt address was registered by someone in the Czech Republic over the weekend, and was then used to capitalise on the error.
The NHS said the site would not be completely clear of the problem until later on Monday.
It added: "NHS Choices is treating this issue with urgency and once resolved we plan to undertake a thorough and detailed analysis to ensure that a full code review is undertaken and steps put in place to ensure no reoccurrence."

More on This Story

Related Stories

Monday 16 December 2013

The unions representing nurses and midwives have joined others in stating their "outright opposition" to the government's NHS plans in England.

NHS plans: Unions move to 'outright opposition'

Howard Catton, RCN: "We cannot move ahead with new health bill"

Related Stories

The unions representing nurses and midwives have joined others in stating their "outright opposition" to the government's NHS plans in England.
The Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Midwives had expressed concerns in the past, but said they were willing to work with ministers.
However, now they want the entire bill covering the changes to be dropped.
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said the unions wanted to "have a go" at government about "pay and pensions".
The colleges' stance comes after a similar move by the British Medical Association last year.
It also mirrors the stance adopted by Unison, which represents a host of administration and support staff, such as porters.
But what impact this intervention has remains to be seen.
The Health and Social Care Bill is still working its way through Parliament, and the bill is in the Lords at the moment.
In many ways it is over the worst political hurdles and it seems the only way it could be stopped would be if the Lib Dems blocked it when it returns to the Commons - but that is considered unlikely.
On the ground, changes are already being made to pave the way for the new system to kick in, in 2013.
For example, while the doctors union is against it there has still been enough GPs coming forward to pilot the new plans in 97% of the country.
Anger
Under the plans, GPs are being put in charge of much of the NHS budget, while the health service is being opened up to greater competition from the private and voluntary sector.

Analysis

The move by the two unions is unlikely to see the bill stopped in its tracks.
But it is clear the government's relationship with NHS staff is fracturing, possibly beyond repair.
Some inside government were saying the move by the royal colleges was being driven by their dissatisfaction over pensions.
That has undoubtedly played a role. So too has the drive to make £20bn of savings by 2015 - the equivalent of 4% of the budget a year.
This is putting more and more pressure on hospitals and waiting times in particular.
It means there is a toxic cocktail brewing inside the health service - and this spells trouble for the government.
It came to power saying - in private at least - that the NHS was its good news story, but all too often it is finding the headlines are negative.
In June the government announced a series of changes to the original proposals in the face of mounting opposition.
These included giving health professionals other than GPs more power over how NHS funds were spent, as well as watering down the role of competition.
The health unions initially gave the changes a cautious welcome, but they have been left disappointed by the finer details that have emerged during the parliamentary process.
One of the key developments was the news, which emerged just after Christmas, that NHS hospitals would be allowed to do 49% of their work in the private sector - something which could potentially mean eight in 10 increasing their private work 25-fold.
Peter Carter, general secretary of the RCN, which represents 410,000 nurses, midwives, support workers and students, said: "The RCN has been on record as saying that withdrawing the bill would create confusion and turmoil, however, on the ground, we believe that the turmoil of proceeding with these reforms is now greater than the turmoil of stopping them.
"The sheer scale of member concerns, which have been building over recent weeks, has led us to conclude that the consequences of the bill may be entirely different from the principles which were originally set out."
Cathy Warwick, of the RCM, said: "The government has failed to present sufficient evidence that its proposals are necessary. They have failed to present evidence that the upheaval will result in an improvement in services to the people of England.
"And they have failed to answer the concerns of the people who fear for the future of the NHS under these plans."
Savings plans
Andrew Lansley said legislation was "essential to give nurses and doctors clinical leadership"
Both unions also expressed concerns that the changes were compromising the ability of the NHS to make the £20bn of savings it has been asked to make by 2015.
Mr Lansley said that nurses had previously been "right at the heart" of the process of planning reforms to the NHS to deliver better care for patients.
"The only thing that has happened in the last few weeks that has led to this situation with the Royal College of Nursing, is that the two sides of the Royal College of Nursing have shifted," he told BBC Breakfast.
"They used to be a professional association that was working with us on professional issues, and will carry on doing that, but now the trade union aspect of the Royal College of Nursing has come to the fore.
"They want to have a go at the government - and I completely understand it - they want to have a go about things like pay and pensions."
Butr that last point was later rejected by the RCN.
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said it was time to scrap the bill.
"A reorganisation on this scale needs a professional consensus for it to succeed. A year since the bill was introduced, it is abundantly clear that the government's plans do have failed to build that."

Hospital chiefs in Sheffield have said sorry after NHS figures revealed objects have been left inside patients three times so far this year.

Sheffield hospits’ apology over errors

Sheffield's Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield's Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Hospital chiefs in Sheffield have said sorry after NHS figures revealed objects have been left inside patients three times so far this year.
The blunders happened between April and September, and were included by NHS England in a list of hospital trusts’ very serious incidents, or ‘never events’ – regarded by the Government as so severe they should never happen.
One of the incidents involved a medical swab left inside a patient following a procedure. It has not been confirmed what the remaining two objects were.
Dr David Throssell, medical director at Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, said: “We treat over one million patients every year and our priority is always to provide safe, high quality care.
“We take never events extremely seriously and always undertake a full investigation into their causes. We are very sorry these events happened.
“We are continually examining our processes and checks to try to limit the chances of never events happening.”
Last year there were seven ‘never events’ at the trust in total, up on three in 2011-12 and two the previous year.
Meanwhile, at both Rotherham Hospital and at Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals, patients have had the wrong part of their body operated on or treated, the figures showed.
Nationally there were 148 very serious incidents from April to September.
Overall, there were 69 cases where foreign objects were left inside patients, including 11 cases of surgical swabs.
Other details from elsewhere in the country showed the wrong patient undergoing a heart procedure, and the incorrect person being given an invasive colonoscopy to check their bowel.
More than 20 were given the incorrect implant or prosthesis, and a woman had a fallopian tube removed instead of her appendix.
One patient had wires left inside them and another patient was left with a needle in their body. In one incident, a drill guide block was left inside a patient.

GP surgeries exposed by inspectors

'Maggot-infested' GP surgeries exposed by inspectors

''I might just go back to my old surgery''

Related Stories

The first national inspection of more than 900 GP surgeries in England has found one in three is failing to meet basic standards.
The Care Quality Commission unearthed failings in some practices, many of which had been selected after concerns.
It said it had found examples of poor standards in the handling of medicines and cleanliness, with maggots found at two surgeries.
Overall, concerns were expressed about a third of practices.
In nine cases the failings were so serious that they could "potentially affect thousands of people", the CQC said.
These practices have been ordered to improve, although in one case new GP management has been brought in.
No door
The checks were targeted mainly at those practices deemed to be high risk ahead of next year's rollout of the first national GP inspection regime.
Among the problems identified across the board were concerns about the way medicines were managed.

GP practices with serious concerns

  • Dr Harira Syed's practice (Rochdale, Greater Manchester) - No equipment available, such as oxygen, to use in the case of a patient emergency. Not enough staff or adequate training in areas such as basic life support.
  • Norris Road Surgery (Sale, Greater Manchester) - Staff not undergone criminal record checks and practice did not gather feedback from patients. No up-to-date training or infection-control policy. Consulting rooms dusty and cluttered.
  • Wolds Practice (Tetford, Lincolnshire) - Errors in the supply of medicines to patients. Problems relating to the management of controlled drugs.
  • Lincoln Road Surgery (Peterborough, Cambridgeshire) - Practice visibly dusty, poorly maintained and inadequate infection control.
  • Northfield Surgery (Doncaster, South Yorkshire) - Prescribing problems, including evidence of patients getting the wrong medicines, and shortfalls in monitoring quality of care.
  • Dr Satish Patel's ( Reading, Berkshire) - Infection control guidance not followed.
  • Long Street Surgery (Wigston, Leicestershire)- Personal information not kept securely and concerns over staff safety. Could not demonstrate reasonable steps to protect children and vulnerable adults from abuse were being taken.
  • King Street Surgery (Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire) -No systems in place to ensure patients were cared for by suitably-trained staff, which meant there was a lack of awareness about child protection issues. Compliant on follow up inspection.
Source: Care Quality Commission
The CQC said it had found examples of emergency drugs being out of date and vaccines not kept in properly regulated fridges - something which could damage the effectiveness of the jab and cause outbreaks of disease.
The regulator said some practices were "visibly dirty", and in one of the better-performing practices, Dale Surgery in Sneinton, Nottinghamshire, inspectors found maggots. The details of a second practice where maggots were found have not yet been released.
Dale Surgery said it took action to deal with a "small number of insect larvae" in a hallway, adding that a pest control company confirmed there was no evidence of wider infestation.
"We are responding to the actions we have been asked to take," it said in a statement.
In another case, a practice was found to be carrying out patient consultations in a room with no door.
It also said practices were not always doing the necessary employment checks, and access to routine appointments was also a "constant theme", with some patients reporting they were unable to get one for weeks.
The checks were carried out to help test how the GP inspection regime will work when it is launched next April as well as to inspect practices where concerns had been flagged up to the regulator.
Of the 910 inspected, 80% were targeted because of known concerns. The remainder were chosen at random.
The CQC is aiming to inspect all 8,000 practices over the following two years and give them one of four ratings - "outstanding", "good", "requires improvement" and "inadequate" - as is happening with hospitals.
The move will mark the first national independent inspection of practices - to date GPs have faced only local audits at most.
Prof Steve Field, the CQC's new chief inspector of GPs, said it would herald the end of an era where poor care was tolerated in general practice.
'Inexcusable'
He said the problems highlighted in the checks had sometimes been known about locally for years.
"We are hearing about problems that people are very worried about but no-one has tackled in the past.
"We need to make sure that everyone, from the most well-off to the most disadvantaged, can get access to really good care."
Dr Chaand Nagpaul from the BMA: "It's important not be alarmist about these figures"
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Of the really poor practices we're talking nine or ten out of that 900, so very tiny numbers. But, if you have a problem with, for example, storage of vaccinations for children, the impact could be on hundreds of patients. So the numbers are small, but the impact is large."
Roger Goss, of the campaign group Patient Concern, said: "The failings are inexcusable. The standards the CQC wants met are the basic minimum for protecting patients' safety, let alone improving their health."
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt added: "Patients have a right to expect the best care from their GP practice."
Dr Maureen Baker, who chairs the Royal College of GPs, said: "Breaches of procedure cannot be condoned - even if they are isolated incidents."
But she added: "Patients should expect high quality and consistent care from their GP practice, and the vast majority of practices do an excellent job of delivering quality care while maintaining the highest possible standards."
• The practices which were ordered to improve were: Dr Harira Syed's practice, Rochdale, Lancashire; Norris Road Surgery, Sale, Cheshire; Wolds Practice, Horncastle, Lincolnshire; Kingshurst Medical, Birmingham; Lincoln Road Surgery, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire; Northfield Surgery, Doncaster, South Yorkshire; Dr Satish Patel's, Reading, Berkshire; Long Street Surgery, Wigston, Leicestershire; King Street Surgery, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...