Showing posts with label Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.. Show all posts

Sunday, 28 September 2014

John Moore-Robinson

Stafford Hospital spleen rupture patient could have lived

John Moore-Robinson John Moore-Robinson died hours after he was discharged from Stafford Hospital

Related Stories

An inquest has concluded a patient who died after being discharged from hospital with an undiagnosed ruptured spleen could have been saved.
John Moore-Robinson died at home in 2006 in Leicestershire after staff at Stafford Hospital failed to notice the severity of his injuries.
Coroner Catherine Mason concluded had staff done their job properly, the 20-year-old would have survived.
His family said the hospital was "in meltdown" at the time.
Mr Moore-Robinson, from Sileby, near Leicester, was admitted to the scandal-hit hospital after a mountain bike accident on Cannock Chase.
He later collapsed at home and died in Leicester Royal Infirmary.
Stafford Hospital John Moore-Robinson was discharged from Stafford Hospital after he was diagnosed with bruised ribs
Mrs Mason found six separate shortcomings at the hospital's A&E all of which contributed to his death.
She said: "The seriousness of Mr Moore-Robinson's condition was not fully appreciated and decisions in relation to his care were made on incomplete information as a result of poor communication, poor documentation, inadequate assessment, insufficient investigation and an oversight to consider medical notes that were available."
She added that on the "balance of probabilities the loss of his life could have been prevented".
Speaking after the hearing, his sister Kelly Hainsworth said it had been a "long eight years" but they were satisfied with the facts and accepted the findings.
'In meltdown'
His father, Frank, believes other lives could have been saved if his son's death had been properly investigated at the time.
"Stafford Hospital at the time was in meltdown," he said.
"Many, many people have lost their lives, including our son John, and that we can never forgive them for. It's been a hard road but one we have had to take."
The inquest heard that a paramedic told Stafford Hospital he believed Mr Moore-Robinson's condition was potentially life-threatening.
Still vomiting
But the patient was sent home with a diagnosis of bruised ribs after an x-ray showed he had not suffered any bone fractures.
Friends described him as confused and still vomiting and they had to use a wheelchair to get him to a waiting car.
Staff told the inquest they felt "bullied" by a four-hour target for patients' length of stay in A&E.
Mrs Mason concluded that Mr Moore-Robinson was not triaged properly and a nurse failed to communicate "obvious" and relevant information which meant he was treated by a junior doctor more than an hour after his arrival at Stafford Hospital.
The hearing was the second inquest into his death after the High Court overturned the original ruling following a campaign by his family.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Wednesday, 24 April 2013


Party leaders in Commons clash over Stafford Hospital scandal

David Cameron and Ed Miliband clash on NHS spending figures and casualty waiting times

Related Stories

David Cameron has said the Stafford Hospital scandal shows Labour cannot be trusted over the NHS as he clashed with Ed Miliband in the Commons.
The prime minister said the failings at Stafford, which led to the death of hundreds of people 2005 and 2008, would be "repeated again" under Labour.
Mr Miliband said that case was terrible but accused the PM of a "disgraceful slur" on Labour's record on the NHS.
And he said A&E services were "in crisis" under the current government.
At the first Prime Minister's Questions for more than a month, the two men clashed over which party was better placed to run the health service, exchanging views on their parties' respective records while in power.
Mr Cameron suggested that if Labour was returned to power at the next election, there was a risk of further tragedies like that at Stafford - which took place while the last Labour government was in power.
"If anyone wants a memory of Labour's record in the NHS, they only have to read the report into the Stafford Hospital," he told MPs.
Under Labour, he suggested, there would be "cuts to the NHS, longer waiting lists and all the problems we saw at Stafford Hospital will be repeated over again".
Mr Miliband said what had happened in Stafford was "terrible" but accused the prime minister of misrepresenting the "transformation" that took place in the health service under the last government and a "disgraceful slur on the doctors and nurses that made that happen".
The Francis report into the Stafford scandal earlier this year criticised the culture of care at the hospital and the proliferation of central targets but did not blame ministers or specific managers for what went wrong.
'In distress'
The Labour leader said accident and emergency services in hospitals were now in crisis, with the number of people waiting for four hours - a government target - rising from 340,000 in 2009-2010 to 888,000 last year.
"Accident and emergency is the barometer of the NHS," Mr Miliband told MPs during heated exchanges.
"This barometer is telling us that it is a system in distress."
The coalition had also presided over a fall in the number of nurses while the NHS helpline was in chaos, he added.
But Mr Cameron said a million more people were being seen at A&E departments now than when Labour was in power while the number of day cases had increased by 500,000 over the past three years.
Waiting times for inpatient operations had fallen since 2010 while waiting times for outpatients were stable, he added.
"The NHS is performing better under this government than it ever did under Labour."

More on This Story

Related Stories

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

Stafford Hospital trust to go into administration


Stafford Hospital trust to go into administration

Monitor administratorsThe administrators have 145 days to to produce a plan for the future of hospital trust services

Related Stories

The trust which runs Stafford Hospital is to be put into administration by the health regulator Monitor.
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust will be run by two specially appointed administrators to "safeguard the future of health services" currently provided.
Dr Hugo Mascie-Taylor and Alan Bloom of Ernst and Young will take over the running of the trust on Tuesday.
It will become the first foundation trust to go into administration.
A report for Monitor, written by a panel including Dr Mascie-Taylor in February, said services at the trust were "unsustainable".
It recommended the closure of its maternity unit, intensive care unit and accident and emergency department.
It said services could instead be provided at neighbouring trusts including the University Hospital of North Staffordshire, the Royal Wolverhampton or Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust.
Monitor said the administrators were appointed after it was concluded the trust, which also runs Cannock Chase hospital, was "neither clinically nor financially sustainable in its current form".
The trust "was likely to become unable to pay its debts", it said.
Last year, the trust reported a drop in annual income of about £4m and received a £20m bailout from the government.
'Starting again'
Monitor said the administrators would have 145 days to work with commissioners and other local healthcare organisations to produce a plan for patients that was "sustainable in the long term".
The plan would be subject to a public consultation, it said.

Analysis

Monitor says the decision to put Mid Staffs into special administration had nothing to do with the recent public inquiry - which highlighted appalling neglect, abuse and incompetence in the four years up to 2009.
But although standards of care have improved, the trust remains clinically and financially unsustainable.
It is now on a fast track to reorganisation, with a strong likelihood that some services will be relocated to bigger hospitals in Stoke-on-Trent, Walsall and Wolverhampton.
Monitor insists they will remain accessible within "reasonable journey times", and local people will be consulted.
Despite Stafford Hospital's notoriety, it commands deep loyalty among many in the town, and for them, the fight starts now.
David Bennett, from Monitor, said the current management at the trust would report to the administrators but patients would not see changes to services over the next 145 days.
He said: "It is important that people in Mid Staffordshire know that they can still access services as usual at Stafford and Cannock hospitals while the Trust Special Administration process is on-going."
"We have taken this decision to make sure that patients in the Mid Staffordshire area have the services they need in the future."
Administrator Hugo Mascie-Taylor said recommendations to downgrade some services were not "set in stone" and would be looked at again.
He said: "We will derive a lot of information from the report but we arrive here starting again, looking at the whole health economy, looking at what other hospitals could do, maybe what other services like community trusts could do.
"It's about taking all that into account and asking what could we do in Stafford and Cannock that's safe and sustainable."
'Put patients first'
The Support Stafford campaign group said it would be holding a march in the town centre on Saturday against the current proposals.
Cheryl Porter from the group said: "We haven't been listened to yet, and these plans are unacceptable.
"I do hope that the administrators listen to what the people need for safety reasons because to take all our acute services away is leaving us very vulnerable in a very dangerous position."
She said more than 15,000 people had signed a petition against the proposals.
The Conservative MP for Stafford, Jeremy Lefroy said he hoped the administrators would "put patients first".
He said: "There is a vital need to retain acute services in Stafford and Cannock because the capacity elsewhere is simply not there.
"They also need to consider the huge disadvantage to local people who would have to travel much longer distances for their treatment but also for hospital visitors who would have to do the same."
The trust's chief executive, Lyn Hill-Tout, said: "We would like to reassure local people and GPs that we are continuing to provide all our usual services at both hospitals and patients should turn up as usual for any appointments they have."
"We would like to thank our local community for their continued support, which means a great deal to staff."
The Mid Staffordshire trust was at the centre of a three-year public inquiry into "appalling standards" of care at Stafford Hospital, following concerns over high death rates.
The concluding Francis Report, published in February, highlighted the "unnecessary suffering of hundreds of people" between 2005 and 2009.

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Sunday, 10 February 2013

Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.


Most of the UK media has reported on the Francis inquiry into significant failures in care at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust.
The report suggests a raft of radical changes to help improve patient safety. These include proposals to make serious but avoidable medical mistakes a criminal offence.
The Healthcare Commission (the hospital regulator at the time) first raised concerns about the trust in 2007, after determining it had unusually high death rates.
These concerns led to a series of reports, undertaken by different bodies, which all found widespread evidence of significant failures in care, including:
  • patients being left in soiled bedding
  • patients not given ready access to food and water
  • chronic staff shortages
  • failure in the leadership of the hospital
  • a culture in which staff members who had concerns about failures in care were discouraged from speaking out
This current inquiry was commissioned in 2010 to investigate wider issues that may have contributed towards these serious problems. The inquiry, carried out by the barrister Robert Francis QC, was asked to come up with recommendations which could help prevent similar failings from happening in the future.
The findings of the inquiry have now been published.


What is a public inquiry?

Public inquiries are wide-ranging investigations commanded by the government to look at very serious issues, particularly where there have been numerous deaths.

Due to their scale and level of detail, they are not often carried out. The most recent health-related public inquiry was the 2005 Shipman Inquiry into the case of Hyde GP Harold Shipman who was imprisoned for murdering 15 patients.

What were the main findings of the inquiry?

The findings of the inquiry can fairly be described as damning. It highlights what amounts to a ‘perfect storm’ of systematic failures of care at multiple levels, including:
  • a ‘Somebody Else's Problem’ attitude among hospital staff – perceived problems were too often assumed to be the responsibility of others
  • an institutional culture that cared more about the needs of the hospital staff than the patients
  • an unacceptable willingness to tolerate poor standards of patient care
  • a failure to accept and respond to legitimate complaints
  • a failure of different teams within the hospital, as well as in the wider community, to communicate and share their concerns
  • a failure of leadership – in particular, financial changes needed to achieve Foundation Trust status were seen, by the inquiry, to take precedence over patient care
Mr Francis concludes that, ‘The extent of the failure of the system shown in this report suggests that a fundamental culture change is needed. This does not require a root and branch reorganisation – the system has had many of those – but it requires changes which can largely be implemented within the system that has now been created by the new reforms.’

What recommendations does the inquiry make?

The inquiry makes a total of 290 individual recommendations. These include:
  • causing harm or death to a patient due to avoidable failures in care should be a dealt with as a criminal offence (rather than a regulatory or civil matter)
  • NHS staff, including doctors and nurses, should have a legal ‘duty of candour’ – so they are obliged to be honest, open and truthful in all their dealings with patients and the public
  • a single regulator of both quality of care and financial matters should be created
  • non-disclosure agreements (‘gagging orders’) – where NHS staff agree not to discuss certain matters – should be banned
  • there should be a ‘fit and proper’ test for hospital directors, similar to those set for football club directors
  • a clear line of leadership needs to be established, so it is always clear who is ultimately ‘in charge’ when it comes to a particular patient
  • uniforms and titles of healthcare support workers should be clearly distinguished from those of registered nurses

What happens next?

The final report of the public inquiry has now been published, and the government has said it will respond to the recommendations of the inquiry in March 2013. Changes required by earlier reports into the failings at Mid Staffs are already underway.
The Prime Minister David Cameron has said that “quality of care” should be on a par with “quality of treatment”.
He said: “We have set this out explicitly in the Mandate to the NHS Commissioning Board, together with a new vision for compassionate nursing.
“We have introduced a tough new programme for tracking and eliminating falls, pressure sores and hospital infections.
“And we have demanded nursing rounds every hour, in every ward of every hospital.”
Edited by NHS Choices. Follow Behind the Headlines on twitter.

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...