Friday 29 March 2013

the ageist BBC says


Are the patients the problem?

PatientTwo thirds of hospital admissions are people over the age of 65
On unveiling the package of measures in the government's response to the Stafford Hospital public inquiry, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said he was confident the changes would ensure problems on such a scale would not slip under the radar again.
A clearer system of rating hospitals and better regulation of managers and healthcare assistants, he argued, would ensure greater accountability, while better training for nurses could create a culture of compassionate care.
But in some ways the changes ignored the elephant in the room: the changing nature of the patient population.
It is an open secret that hospitals in the 21st Century are full of patients that should not be there.
A combination of the ageing population and advances in medicine have meant that there is a growing number of frail, elderly people who need intensive care and support.
But all too often that is not available in the community, and so they end up in hospital as an emergency case.
Two-thirds of hospital admissions are people over the age of 65. Many have multiple chronic conditions, such as heart disease and dementia.
In fact, the change in the patient population has been so acute that aKing's Fund study has put the average age of a patient at over 80.
That is presenting problems for staff that no amount of training and resources can counter.
'Wrong place'
As one nurse, who has worked in the NHS for over 30 years, told me: "The patients we are seeing in hospital are completely different from the ones that were being admitted when I started out.
"These patients need a complex package of care and support.
"They need help washing, dressing and eating round-the-clock. It requires a lot more personal care than the hospital environment is designed for."
However, it need not be like this. The evidence suggests as many as a third of hospital admissions could be prevented with better systems in place in the community.
But instead of going down the numbers being admitted as emergencies is actually on the rise - it is up by nearly 40% in the past decade - and that is having a damaging impact on hospital wards.
The Royal College of Physicians has warned hospitals are "on the brink" with a mindset developing among staff that many patients are simply in the "wrong place".
Its report, Hospitals on the edge?, cautioned staff against such defeatism, but it was also clear for that to change there needed to be progress on keeping people out of hospital.
To be fair, it was a point acknowledged on Tuesday by Care Services Minister Norman Lamb.
During the government press conference to announce the response to the public inquiry, he said it had to be a "top priority", conceding "a lot of hospitals have large numbers of frail elderly that perhaps with better care would not have ended up there".
Improving the culture, accountability and transparency is clearly important, but the defining challenge for the health service over the next decade and beyond could prove to be something completely different

Wednesday 27 March 2013

No more covering up errors, NHS told


No more covering up errors, NHS told

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt: "Stafford Hospital to be ''a catalyst for change''
The NHS will have a legal duty to be honest about mistakes as part of an overhaul of the system in the wake of the Stafford Hospital scandal.
The move is part of a package of measures in England to put patients at the heart of the NHS, ministers said.
There will also be a new ratings system for hospitals and care homes, while changes to nurse training will be piloted.
It comes after the public inquiry claimed patients had been "betrayed".
The harrowing neglect and abuse at the hospital between 2005 to 2008 which led to needless deaths has already been well documented.
Statistics at the time showed there were between 400 and 1,200 more deaths than would be expected.
The £13m inquiry, published at the start of February, focused on why the problems were not picked up sooner.
It accused the NHS of putting corporate self-interest ahead of patients, concluding the failings went from the top to the bottom of the system.
'Fundamental change'
In total, the report made 290 recommendations.
Ministers have not responded individually to each one.
But Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the response on Tuesday marked the start of a "fundamental change to the system".

Government response at a glance

  • Duty of candour to be placed on NHS boards to be honest about mistakes.
  • Consideration being given to making individual doctors and nurses criminally responsible for covering up errors.
  • New ratings system for hospitals and care homes based on Ofsted scheme used in schools.
  • Posts of chief inspector of hospitals and care homes to be created.
  • Nurses to spend up to a year working as a healthcare assistant so they get experience providing basic care such as washing and dressing in pilot schemes.
  • Managers who fail in their jobs to be barred from holding such positions in the future.
  • Code of conduct and minimum training standards for healthcare assistants, but not full registration scheme as recommended by inquiry.
  • Tough rules to be drawn up to allow trusts to be put into administration when basic standards are not met unless problems can be resolved quickly.
  • Department of Health civil servants to be forced to spend time on the front line of the NHS.
"We cannot merely tinker around the edges - we need a radical overhaul with high quality care and compassion at its heart."
He said he wanted to create a culture of "zero harm" through the changes.
Key to this will be the new post of chief inspector of hospitals - announced immediately after the publication of the public inquiry - and the statutory duty of the NHS to be honest about mistakes, known as a duty of candour.
But the government said it would wait before deciding whether to make individual doctors and nurses criminally accountable for hiding mistakes as recommended by the inquiry as it was concerned about creating a "culture of fear".
The government has also stopped short of the inquiry's demand for a registration system for health care assistants.
Instead, it confirmed it will push ahead with a code of conduct and minimum training standards.
On training for nurses, ministers said there would be a pilot programme whereby nurses will have to work for up to a year as a healthcare assistant before getting NHS funding for their degree.
Meanwhile, managers who fail in their jobs will be barred from holding such positions in the future.
Heather Wilhelms describes how her husband had to resort to drinking from a vase while in hospital
The ratings system, which will start being rolled out later this year, will be based on the Ofsted system used in schools.
Hospital and care homes will be given an outstanding, good, requiring improvement or poor rating.
However, in hospitals individual departments will be given their own rating as well to reflect the increased complexity of the organisations.
But shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the culture of the NHS would not be changed unless staffing problems were resolved first.
"We will never get the right culture on our wards if they are understaffed and overstretched," Mr Burnham said.
Royal College of Nursing general secretary Peter Carter agreed staffing was an issue and said he was disappointed there would not be a registration system for healthcare assistants.
He also said he had concerns about the measures on nurse training, but added the the union was still "committed" to working with government to ensure a "patient-centred NHS becomes a reality".
But Don Redding, policy director of the patient group National Voices, felt the changes would make a difference, particularly the duty of candour.
"In cases where patients have been harmed or worse, both senior managers and their legal advisers have generally decided their first duty is to the interests of the trust. This new legal duty will rebalance that."
Mike Farrar, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents health trusts, said: "The government has used this time to produce an overarching response rather than a something which tries to tick all the boxes.
"The response finds the right balance between external assurance measures and internal changes focused on transforming the NHS culture."
Robert Francis QC, who chaired the public inquiry, added: "Even though it is clear that it does not accept all my recommendations, the government's statement indicates its determination to make positive changes to the culture of the NHS."

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Friday 22 March 2013

Ageism


Ageism in politics is 'pathetic' says Cable

William Gladstone aged 71William Gladstone became prime minister aged 82 in 1892
Vince Cable has criticised ageism in modern-day politics, pointing out that Churchill and Gladstone served as prime minister in their 70s and 80s.
The Lib Dem business secretary, who is 69, said he would stand for election again in two years time and had "bags of energy and stamina" left.
Questioning politicians' ability to do the job because of their age was "pathetic", he told the House magazine.
He suggested Deng Xiaoping, who ruled China in his 80s, was a role model.
Mr Cable briefly served as Lib Dem leader after Sir Menzies Campbell quit in 2007 and has not ruled out the possibility of standing for the top job in future should a vacancy arise.
During his 18-month stint as leader, Sir Menzies faced questions about his age and ability to cope with the demands of the 24-hour news cycle.
'Bags of energy'
Mr Cable said his colleague had been "very unfairly treated" at the time.
"It was as bad as attacking people for their colour, for their gender. Pathetic actually, it demeaned the people who did it."
Mr Cable confirmed that he would stand to be an MP again in the next election, scheduled for 2015, and had no "inhibitions" about doing so.
"I take the view that as long as you have got bags of stamina and capacity to do the job and I do have a lot of energy and stamina, I'm perfectly fit and healthy."
Asked about role models, he said Lord Heseltine was still active in politics and business in his late 70s while two of the country's greatest leaders had remained in No 10 long after conventional retirement age.
"Gladstone became prime minister when he was over 80, didn't he? I think Churchill was over 70, wasn't he?"
He added: "Talking of role models, Deng Xiaoping totally transformed China in the last century. I think he was 80 when he took over. And he survived the Long March."
Mr Cable - who was a Labour activist and councillor before joining the SDP in the 1980s, said he had a "sensible working relationship" with Labour but his party would adopt a policy of "equidistance" between them and their Conservative coalition partners at the next election.
"That will be the word Paddy Ashdown invented once upon a time and it will be the case next time," he added.
"It will make the point that in the national interest we are willing to work with other parties on either side."

Friday 8 March 2013

Nurse regulator 'not good enough'

Nurse regulator 'not good enough'

Nurses at workIt is illegal to work as a nurse or midwife without being on the NMC register

Related Stories

The regulator for nurses and midwives is still not doing enough to protect patients properly, MPs are warning.
The Health Select Committee said a huge backlog of cases was hampering the ability of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) to safeguard standards.
The cross-party group of MPs also highlighted the regulator's poor record of having decisions overturned on appeal.
But the NMC said it was working hard to put things right.
The regulator, which is in charge of registering and regulating the 670,000 nurses and midwives in the UK, has been dogged by problems for some time.
Last year year an independent report by the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence said the NMC was failing at "every level".
This report recognised progress was being made by the new management team, but that there was a "serious gap between current performance and acceptable standards".
It noted the NMC had a backlog of cases dating back more than two years that topped 570.
It said this needed to be cleared by June.
It also expressed disappointment that the rollout of revalidation - regular checks on nurses - was being delayed by 2015. It has already started for doctors.
Challenges ahead
And the MPs said much more needed to be done to tackle two of the major underlying causes of the problems - IT and staff turnover.
It also urged the regulator to be more ambitious in its plans for dealing with cases.
Its current proposal is that the average should take no longer than 18 months, but MPs said it should be half this.
Committee chairman Stephen Dorrell said: "The NMC's job is to protect patient safety by registering nurses and midwives and by enforcing acceptable standards of practice.
"The simple fact is that in recent years it has fallen down on that task."
NMC chief executive Jackie Smith said: "We welcome the report, which recognises the genuine progress we are making, and challenges us to do better.
"We don't underestimate the challenges ahead."

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Jeremy Hunt attacks 'complacent' hospitals


Jeremy Hunt attacks 'complacent' hospitals

By Nick Triggle

Mr Hunt said his words were aimed at the bulk of hospitals that were not excellent and not poor

Related Stories

nursesToo many hospitals are coasting along, settling for meeting minimum standards, according to the health secretary.
In a speech on Friday, Jeremy Hunt will attack a culture of "complacency" and "low aspirations", which he believes is holding the NHS in England back.
He is expected to say while there is a concerted effort to tackle failing hospitals, there should also be a focus on "mediocrity".
Labour's Andy Burnham blamed ministers for the failings in front line care.
Mr Hunt's comments come a month after the problems at Stafford Hospital were laid bare.
The final report of the public inquiry into the scandal, published at the start of February, attacked the way the system protected corporate self-interest rather than putting patients first.
The warnings have already led to investigations into 14 hospital trusts with high death rates.
But Mr Hunt, in a speech to the Nuffield Trust think-tank in Dorking, Surrey, will say part of the challenge is tackling "mediocrity and low expectations before they turn into failure and tragedy".

So how many hospitals are mediocre?

The health secretary will make it clear in his speech that he is not saying the vast majority are mediocre, but according to sources his words are aimed at a significant bulk of those plodding along in the middle.
It is commonly said about a 10th of hospital trusts are failing, although double that are actually not meeting all the essential standards set out by the Care Quality Commission.
That leaves about 80% of trusts that are doing what they should. Some of these will be excellent - perhaps about 10-15% - and some will be striving to become excellent - perhaps a similar number. That leaves close to half that could be said to be stuck in the middle, coasting along.
'Complacency'
"Coasting can kill. Not straight away, but over time as complacency sets in, organisations look inwards, standards drop and then suddenly something gives," he will say.
"I would never describe the majority of hospitals or wards in the NHS as mediocre - but I do believe our system fails to challenge low aspirations in too many parts of the system.
"Imagine for a moment that the main objective for our Olympic athletes was not to win but to 'not come last'. How many gold medals would we have won then?
"It sounds ridiculous doesn't it? But today I want to suggest that too much of the NHS is focused on doing just that.
"Not on achieving world class levels of excellence - the gold medals of healthcare - but meeting minimum standards, the equivalent of 'not coming last'."
Sources said Mr Hunt's words were aimed not at those that are failing minimum standards or waiting time targets, but the bulk in the middle that were not excellent and not poor.
Family test
He is expected to single out Walsall Manor, a hospital in the West Midlands, which has turned itself around after faring badly in the national patients' survey two years ago. The hospital decided to carry out one-to-one interviews with 100 patients to find out what they thought of their care and the staff that looked after them.
On the Today programme, Richard Kirby, chief executive of Walsall NHS Healthcare Trust, said this led to investment in specific areas flagged up by patients and a better understanding of what patients want. The Trust has also introduced a friends and family test.
"Every patient who is admitted to our hospital is asked when leaving if they would recommend us to friends and family and scores are shared with all of our teams week in, week out.
Jo Webber from the NHS Confederation: ''People come to do the best they possibly can for patients''
"We get critical and positive responses. It gives us a simple, clear way of understanding how we are doing."
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said the health secretary was right to draw attention to the issue.
"There is a malaise in the NHS which has allowed mediocrity to become commonplace," she said.
"We hear from patients every day who are not happy with their care. I am not talking about the really bad, just those that are not putting patients first."
Investment
But shadow health secretary Mr Burnham said it was "no good for ministers to blame hospitals and staff when it is they who have thrown the whole system into chaos with a huge re-organisation, which has siphoned £3bn out of front line care.
Shadow Health Secretary Andy Burnham: "Coasting is the last thing hospitals are doing - they are working flat out."
"Hospitals across England are on a knife-edge and they need a government that provides support rather than points the finger," he said.
Royal College of Nursing director general Peter Carter said: "From one perspective I absolutely agree with him, of course we don't want mediocrity.
"But to make sure that does not happen we need to invest in staff. When we won one gold medal in the 1996 Olympics we started investing in our athletes, rowers and cyclists.
"To achieve gold medal standards in the NHS we need to do the same. It requires proper leadership, time to train and appropriate pay."
Mike Farrar, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said there was room for improvement, adding hospitals needed to be more open and transparent.
"I believe that there is a crucial opportunity to make this culture change happen. We cannot miss this chance to deliver better care."

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...