Showing posts with label big sister. Show all posts
Showing posts with label big sister. Show all posts

Friday 27 March 2015

Office workers 'too sedentary'

  1. Office workers 'too sedentary'
  2. By James Gallagher
  3. Health editor, BBC News website

  1. comments

  2. Office workers
  3. Office workers need to get off their backsides and move around more, according to a new campaign.
  4. On Your Feet Britain says sitting for long periods at work is linked to a host of health problems, which are not undone by working out in the gym.
  5. It is calling on people to stand regularly, walk around more and embrace ideas such as standing meetings or standing desks.
  6. Experts described inactivity as "one of the biggest" challenges in health.
  7. Heart disease, type 2 diabetes, cancers and poor mental health have all been linked to sedentary behaviour.
  8. The effect is found even in people who class themselves as fit, such as those who cycle to work, if they also spend long periods of time sitting.
  9. Prolonged sitting is thought to slow the metabolism and affect the way the body controls sugar levels, blood pressure and the breakdown of fat.
  10. The campaign is a partnership between the group Get Britain Standing and the British Heart Foundation (BHF) charity.
  11. Their survey of 2,000 office workers suggested:
  1. 45% of women and 37% of men spend less than 30 minutes a day up on their feet at work
  2. More than half regularly eat their lunch at their desk
  3. 78% office workers felt they spent too much time sitting down
  4. Nearly two-thirds were worried sitting at work was having a negative impact on their health
  5. Gavin Bradley, from Get Britain Standing, told the BBC News website: "We're all victims of our environment, we've taken a lot of activity out of the workplace and we're sitting longer and longer.
  6. "We need new and innovative ways of addressing the issue.
  7. "Stand up when you're on the phone or in meetings, do everything you can to avoid sitting."
  8. Office inactivity
  9. 5.2lb(2.4kg)
  10. estimated amount of weight that can be lost by standing up for an extra 30 minutes a day for a year
  1. 37% of men spend less than 30 minutes a day up on their feet at work
  2. 45% of women spend less than 30 minutes a day up on their feet at work
  3. 50% regularly eat their lunch at their desk
  4. Source: Get Britain Standing and British Heart Foundation
  5. Getty Images
  6. Other ideas including using the stairs instead of a lift, eating lunch away from your desk, taking a break from your computer every 30 minutes and walking to a colleague's desk rather than phoning or emailing them.
  7. Get Britain Standing says standing burns an extra 50 calories per hour than being seated.
  8. Dr Mike Loosemore, head of exercise medicine at University College Hospital, told the BBC: "Inactivity and sedentary behaviour is one of the biggest challenges we have in public health today.
  9. "Compared with 100 years ago, our levels of activity are tiny, the number of manual jobs are continually reducing, even if you dig a road up you sit in a little tractor.
  10. "It's about changing attitudes to how people behave at work and changing the culture of the workplace that just means moving around at little bit more, even just standing up can make a big difference to calories burned and how alert, creative and productive you are."

  11. Office workers
  12. Lisa Young, project manager for the BHF's Health at Work programme, said: "We're all guilty of being too glued to our screens sometimes, but these results show just how far the couch potato culture has infiltrated the workplace.
  13. "Too many of us are tied to our desks at work, which could be increasing our risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
  14. "That's why we want workers to get up and get moving on 24 April and take a stand against cardiovascular disease.
  15. "A bit of healthy competition in the workplace could go a long way to reversing this trend whilst raising vital funds for our ground-breaking research."

Sunday 31 August 2014

The five year-old boy taken from hospital by his parents while being treated for a life-threatening tumour has been found alive in Spain, shortly after his father released a video explaining their decision to flee.
Ashya King was rushed to a specialist hospital in Malaga for urgent medical treatment while his parents Brett King, 51, and Naghemeh King, 45, were detained by officers in Spain.
The family were discovered after they checked into Hostel Esperanza in Benajarafe.
Earlier, Mr King, 51, released a 10-minute video on You Tube. In the clip, Mr King lies on a bed with his son Ashya between his legs. Ashya is attached by a tube to a drip on the side of the bed.
Speaking directly to the camera, Mr King pleads with police to call of their international search, which was launched after Ashya was taken from Southampton General Hospital on Thursday.
He said he wanted Ashya to have Proton Beam therapy which is not available for the treatment of brain cancer in the UK and therefore had no choice but to take him out of the hospital.
Mr King claimed that when he told doctors he did not want Ashya to have the treatment they recommended, they were threatened with an emergency protection order, which would have prevented them from seeing their son.
“Proton beam is so much better for children with brain cancer,” he said in the clip. “It zones in on the area, whereby normal radiation passes right through his head and comes out the other side and destroys everything in his head.
“So we pleaded with them for proton beam treatment. They looked at me straight in the face and said with his cancer - which is called medulloblastoma - it would have no benefit whatsoever."
Mr King said his son's treatment seemed like "trial and error" and claimed he was told if he questioned the treatment the hospital would seek an emergency protection order.
He said: "After that I realised I can't speak to the oncologist at all, because if I actually ask anything or give any doubt I wasn't in full accord with them, they were going to get a protection order which meant in his deepest, darkest hour I wouldn't be there to look after him, and neither would my wife - they would prevent us from entering the ward.
"That's such a cruel system I decided to start looking at the proton beam myself."
He added: "We decided to try and sort it out ourselves but now we're refugees almost.

Brett King explains why he has taken Ashya out of UK
"We can't do anything. The police are after us. The things we want to do to raise the money to pay for the proton beam, they've prevented it now.
"So my son is being treated and he's doing fine. We're very happy with his progress. We're not neglecting him. He has everything he had in hospital."
On Saturday, police obtained a European arrest warrant. Officers said the warrant was obtained on the grounds of neglect but it would be used only as a last resort.
They said they “would much prefer for the parents to come forward voluntarily”.
Police had raised concerns about Ashya’s battery-operated feeding tube, which they said would have run out on Friday night. They said it could be replaced only by medical experts, leading police to warn that “time is running out” for the youngster.
But Mr King said the family had enough feeding packs and Calpol to care for their son.
“We were most disturbed today to find his face is all over the internet and newspapers and we have been labelled as kidnappers, putting his life at risk, neglect," he said.
"As you can see there's nothing wrong with him, he is very happy actually since we took him out of hospital," Mr King said.
"He has been smiling a lot more, he has very much been interacting with us."
Mr King said his son was treated by Dr Gary Nicolin, a consultant paediatric oncologist with over 25 years’ experience.
Dr Nicolin, who has worked at the hospital for the last decade, has previously worked in Canada and South Africa.
Mr King said he told doctors he would pay for the treatment himself.
Mr King said Ashya was "responding so much better" than he did in hospital.
"We couldn't take it any more - not knowing and not being able to question anything in fear that they say, 'Sorry Mr and Mrs King, emergency protection order, you're no longer allowed in the ward'," he said.
"Under that stress, our son has grade four brain tumour, we couldn't discuss or question them at all in fear that our son would be in that ward all day long by himself without his parents being able to come in.
"We couldn't be under that system any more.
"I was going to get the money to pay for the proton beam therapy but they have prevented that now because the Spanish police are involved and I can't do want I wanted to do."
Mr King urged police to call off "this ridiculous chase".
"We're not neglecting our son, he's in perfectly good health," he said.
"My son is smiling, he's happy, we're doing things as a family. We just want to be left in peace. He's very sick. I just want to get on with his treatment. I'm not coming back to England if I cannot give him the treatment I want, which is proper treatment.
"I just want positive results for my son."
According to Cancer Research UK, Proton Beam therapy is a highly-targeted type of radiotherapy that can treat hard-to-reach cancers, such as spinal tumours (chordomas), with a lower risk of damaging the surrounding tissue and causing side effects
The Kings' eldest son was caring for his siblings while his parents were held at a police station in nearby Velez-Malaga.
Mr and Mrs King were expected to be taken to Madrid on Sunday for an extradition hearing at Madrid's Central Criminal Court.
Assistant Chief Constable Chris Shead of Hampshire Constabulary said the boy's parents had been arrested at 10pm local time after Spanish police stopped the family's vehicle.
"We don't have many details on Ashya's condition at this point in time but what we do know is that he was showing no visible signs of distress," Mr Shead said.
"Ashya has now been taken to a hospital in Malaga. The parents have been arrested. They have been taken to a police station."
Spanish police were acting on a European arrest warrant requested by Hampshire Constabulary when they arrested the Kings.
When they stopped the family's Hyundai people carrier officers found Ashya and his parents inside.
Mr Shead said: "There are no winners in this situation. I've said all along that this must be a terribly distressing time for Ashya's family and I stand by that now."
He added that it was too soon to say when Ashya would come back to the UK but Southampton General Hospital have been contacted so they can liaise with the medical taking care of him in Spain.
"Ashya's brothers and sisters were not in the vehicle," Mr Shead said. "We have located them. They're all okay, they're fine. They are actually in a hotel about 10 miles away."
He also said that a team of Hampshire police officers would be going to Spain tomorrow to continue the investigation.
No one from Southampton General Hospital was available for comment. 

Tuesday 3 December 2013

male and female brains different


Boy in autism studyMost autism research involves boys and men

Related Stories

Autism affects male and female brains differently, a study has suggested.
UK experts studied brain scans of 120 men and women, with half of those studied having autism.
The differences found in the research, published in journal Brain, show more work is needed to understand how autism affects girls, the scientists say.
Experts said girls with the condition could be more stigmatised than boys - and it could be harder for them to be diagnosed at all.
Autism affects 1% of the population and is more prevalent in boys, so most research has focused on them.
In this study, scientists from the Autism Research Centre at the University of Cambridge used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine how autism affects the brain of males and females.
Male and female brains differ anyway - tissue volume is greater in males.
'Look-alikes'
The study looked at the difference between the brains of typical males and those with autism - and then females with and without autism.

Start Quote

There really needs to be more research and clinical attention toward females 'on the spectrum'”
Dr Meng-Chuan LaiUniversity of Cambridge
They found the brains of females with autism "look" more like - but still not the same as - typical male brains, when compared with the brains of females without autism.
But the same kind of difference was not seen in males with autism - so their brains did not show "extreme" male characteristics.
Dr Meng-Chuan Lai, who worked on the study said: "What we have known about autism to date is mainly male-biased.
"This research shows that it is possible that the effect of autism manifests differently according to one's gender.
"Therefore we should not blindly assume that everything found for males or from male-predominant mixed samples will apply to females."
He said future research may need to look at males and females equally to discover both similarities and differences.
Dr Lai added: "Lastly, there really needs to be more research and clinical attention toward females 'on the spectrum'."
'Masking'

Start Quote

Many girls go on to develop secondary problems such as anxiety, eating disorders or depression”
Carol Povey,National Austitic Society
Carol Povey, Director of The National Autistic Society's Centre for Autism, said: "Historically, research on autism has been largely informed by the experiences of men and boys with the condition.
"This important study will therefore help our understanding of how the condition differs between genders."
She added: "Girls can be more adaptive than boys and can develop strategies that often mask what we traditionally think of as the signs of autism.
"This "masking" can lead to a great deal of stress, and many girls go on to develop secondary problems such as anxiety, eating disorders or depression.
"It's important that we build on this study and more research is conducted into the way autism manifests in girls and women, so that we can ensure that gender does not remain a barrier to diagnosis and getting the right support."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Monday 28 October 2013

Children urged to put away screens and play outside

Children urged to put away screens and play outside

Children climbing gateChildren have lost touch with nature and the outdoors in just one generation, argues the Wild Network campaign

Related Stories

Children are being urged to take back their "wild time", swapping 30 minutes of screen use for outdoor activities.
The call to renew a connection with nature comes from a collaboration of almost 400 organisations, from playgroups to the NHS.
The Wild Network wants children to take up activities like conkers and camping.
"The tragic truth is that kids have lost touch with nature and the outdoors in just one generation," said chairman Andy Simpson.
The organisers argue that swapping 30 minutes of television and computer games each day for outdoor play would increase the levels of fitness and alertness and improve children's well-being
Marketing nature
"Time spent outdoors is down, roaming ranges have fallen drastically, activity levels are declining and the ability to identify common species has been lost," said Mr Simpson.
He referred to recent research by the RSPB which suggested only one in five children aged eight to 12 had a connection with nature.

Start Quote

We need to make more space for wild time in children's daily routine, freeing this generation of kids to have the sort of experiences that many of us took for granted”
David BondProject Wild Thing
"With many more parents becoming concerned about the dominance of screen time in their children's lives, and growing scientific evidence that a decline in active time is bad news for the health and happiness of our children, we all need to become marketing directors for nature," said Mr Simpson.
"An extra 30 minutes of wild time every day for all under 12-year-olds in the UK would be the equivalent of just three months of their childhood spent outdoors.
"We want parents to see what this magical wonder product does for their kids' development, independence and creativity, by giving wild time a go."
The campaign launches on Friday with the release of a documentary film, Project Wild Thing.
It tells the story of how, in a bid to get his daughter and son outside, film-maker David Bond appoints himself marketing director for nature, working with branding and outdoor experts to develop a campaign.
'Misty-eyed nostalgia'
"I wanted to understand why my children's childhood is so different from mine, whether this matters and, if it does, what I can do about it," said Mr Bond.
"The reasons why kids, whether they live in cities or the countryside, have become disconnected from nature and the outdoors are complex.
"Project Wild Thing isn't some misty-eyed nostalgia for the past. We need to make more space for wild time in children's daily routine, freeing this generation of kids to have the sort of experiences that many of us took for granted.
"It's all about finding wildness on your doorstep and discovering the sights, sounds and smells of nature, whether in a back garden, local park or green space at the end of the road."
The campaign, said to be the biggest ever aiming to reconnect children with the outdoors, includes the National Trust, the RSPB, Play England and the NHS, as well as playgroups, businesses and schools.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Thursday 6 June 2013

Minister Anna Soubry backtracks on women GPs 'burden'

Minister Anna Soubry backtracks on women GPs 'burden'

Female doctorAre women a "burden" on the NHS?

Related Stories

There are "unintended consequences" for the NHS of training and employing women as GPs, Health Minister Anna Soubry has said in Parliament.
She was responding to a question about the "burden" of female doctors marrying and starting families.
The head of the Royal College of GPs said it was wrong to blame women doctors for problems in the NHS.
Ms Soubry later said her comments were not meant to be "derogatory" and the answer was to hire more GPs.
During a debate in Westminster Hall, Conservative MP Anne McIntosh, said: "It's a controversial thing to say, but perhaps I as a woman can say this - 70% of medical students currently are women and they are very well educated and very well qualified.
"When they go into practice and then in the normal course of events will marry and have children, they often want to go part-time and it is obviously a tremendous burden training what effectively might be two GPs working part-time where they are ladies.
"And I think that is something that is going to put a huge burden on the health service."
In response, Ms Soubry said: "You make a very important point when you talk about, rightly, the good number of women who are training to be doctors, but the unintended consequences."
Dr Clare Gerada, the chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners, took to Twitter to say: "I cannot believe that women doctors are being blamed for problems in NHS."
In a statement later, Anna Soubry clarified her remarks saying she had "not intended to be derogatory" and was responding to a point made by another MP during the debate.
"The solution is that we need to increase the number of GPs and we are doing that.
"This government supports good working practices such as flexible working, job-sharing and part-time working which help retain female doctors.

Monday 27 May 2013

Coffee addiction: Do people consume too much caffeine?

Coffee addiction: Do people consume too much caffeine?


Tea, coffee beans, energy drink, espresso maker, cans of energy drinks, coffee
US officials are investigating the safety of caffeine in snacks and energy drinks, worried about the "cumulative impact" of the stimulant - which is added to a growing number of products. Is our tea and coffee-fuelled society too dependent on the world's favourite drug?
The bubbling kettle, the aroma from the mug, the first bitter mouthful of the morning.
It's a ritual without which the working day would be, for millions of people, frankly horrifying.
Caffeine is, according to New Scientist, the planet's most popular "psychoactive drug." In the United States alone, more than 90% of adults are estimated to use it every day.
But now even the US - home of Coca-Cola, Starbucks and the 5-Hour Energy shot - is questioning the wisdom of adding it to everyday foodstuffs like waffles, sunflower seeds, trail mix and jelly beans.
In a statement, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) highlighted the "unfortunate example" of Wrigley chewing gum producing packs of eight sticks which each contained as much caffeine as half a cup of coffee. Subsequently, Wrigley said it would "pause" production of the product.

How healthy is your coffee?

Coffee beans
"On the plus side, coffee is known to be packed full of antioxidants, which stop other molecules oxidising and producing free radicals.
"Women who drink two or more cups of coffee a day are less likely to get depressed, other research suggests.
"However previous studies have linked high caffeine intake to raised cholesterol and short-term high blood pressure."
The agency is also looking at highly-caffeinated energy drinks, and said it was concerned about the "cumulative impact" of adding stimulants to products.
According to the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the number of people seeking emergency treatment after ingesting energy drinks doubled to more than 20,000 in 2011.
However, the energy drink industry says its products are safe and insists there is no proof of a link with any harmful reactions.
There have been documented cases of fatal overdoses caused by "caffeine toxicity", though these are very rare. Scientists at Johns Hopkins University, studying its addictive properties, found that withdrawal symptoms included tiredness, headaches, difficulty concentrating, muscle pain and nausea.
But there is far from any kind of scientific consensus that caffeine use is harmful. A recent study by the Harvard School of Public Health suggested that "coffee drinking doesn't have any serious detrimental health effects" and that drinking up to six cups a day was "not associated with increased risk of death from any cause".
In moderation, caffeine may have some positive effects. Research suggests it could be associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer and breast cancer. A recent study linked drinking coffee and tea with a lower risk of type two diabetes.
As a result, the FDA has pledged to "determine what is a safe level" of caffeine use.
The agency's move has been welcomed by those who fear caffeine is already encroaching too much into our daily lives - often in products where it may not be expected.
"Many people just aren't aware of how much caffeine they are taking," says Lynn Goldman, dean of the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services.
As a result, she says, they could unwittingly create problems for themselves with insomnia, indigestion, or their blood pressure.
It's especially worrying for parents, who can find it hard to regulate their children's intake.
BeverageCaffeine (mg)Quantity
Coffee
77-150
6oz/170g
Tea
40-80
5oz/142g
Coca-Cola
34.5
12oz/340g
Pepsi
38
12oz/340g
Red Bull
80
8.3oz/235g
But challenging the hegemony of caffeine may be a difficult task on a planet that consumes 120,000 tonnes of the substance per annum.
In Finland, the world's most caffeinated country, the average adult consumes 400mg of the drug every day - equivalent to four or five cups of coffee a day, and equal to the maximum daily limit recommended by the UK Food Standards Agency.
"We think that, when used in moderation, caffeine doesn't pose a risk," says Sanna Kiuru, a senior officer at Evira, the Finnish food safety authority. "It's mainly adults who drink coffee, not children. For us the levels are quite moderate."
Even buzz-loving Finns have been troubled by the rise of stealth stimulants, however.
"We have been concerned about the rise in caffeine in different foods," says Kiuru. Highly-caffeinated energy drinks in Finland are obliged to carry warning labels - a practice that will be extended across the EU from 2014.
For most caffeine consumers, its chief benefit is that, by stimulating alertness, it helps you get more done.
This is a trait that makes it unusual among recreational substances, says Stephen Braun, author of Buzz: The Science and Lore of Alcohol and Caffeine.
Coffee-drinkers chart
"Its appeal is that it helps us earn more money," he adds.
"What makes it different from other drugs is that it's used as a productivity tool - not for pleasure, like cannabis, or as a relaxant, like alcohol."
Perhaps the closest analogy is with coca leaves, chewed by labourers to give them extra energy in countries like Peru and Bolivia.
It's no coincidence, Braun believes, that caffeine's popularity boomed in Europe at the dawn of the industrial revolution, when the race for ever-increased productivity accelerated.
Many of history's creative minds have also been associated with some truly epic feats of caffeine consumption.
According to one biographer, the French novelist and playwright Balzac drank as many as 50 cups of coffee a day. "Were it not for coffee one could not write, which is to say one could not live," he once insisted.
For seven years, the film-maker David Lynch ate at the same Los Angeles diner every day, drinking up to seven sweetened cups of coffee "with lots of sugar" in one sitting, which he said would guarantee that"lots of ideas" arrived.
Ludwig van Beethoven was said to have painstakingly counted out exactly 60 coffee beans per cup when he brewed coffee.
Perhaps the most well-publicised recent tales of caffeine excess featured the somewhat less critically revered singer Robbie Williams, whoreportedly consumed 36 double espressos and 20 cans of Red Bull a day.
It is the routine task itself, as much as the stimulant properties of caffeine, that makes the process so significant, Mason Currey, author of Daily Rituals: How Artists Work.
"A lot of artists use the process of making the coffee as a gateway to the creative process," he adds.
"You need to get into the right mindset to do that sort of work, and the preparation ritual provides a focus."
Cup of teaDoes the very ritual of preparing caffeinated drinks help minds focus?
But attempts to clamp down on the spread of the substance have historically proved futile.
In 1911, the US government sued the Coca-Cola Company, on the basis that the caffeine in its drink was "injurious to health", but Coca-Cola prevailed in the courts.
One problem with attempting to regulate the substance, says Braun, is that it affects everyone in differently - people's varying physiologies and metabolisms making it impossible to prescribe a "safe" limit that works for everyone.
"Ultimately, you have to become your own scientist - there isn't an alternative to careful self-experimentation," he says.
Most people are likely to have ascertained by adulthood how much, or little, tea or coffee they can tolerate at a time.
But critics say this doesn't apply to energy drinks and caffeinated foodstuffs, whose effects are arguably more difficult to judge.
However profitable these products may prove for their manufacturers though, Currey suspects they well never acquire the mystique of coffee and tea.
"There's something that's not quite as special and evocative about them," he says.
"Buying an 5-Hour Energy drink from the 7-Eleven [convenience store] doesn't have the ambience of brewing a cup of coffee. I can't imagine future biographers of great artists and writers describing this stuff in the same way."
Additional reporting by Mark Bosworth in Helsinki

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...