Showing posts with label 'Shame on us nurses'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'Shame on us nurses'. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

let down by poor end-of-life care

end of life
Thousands of dying patients are being let down by poor end-of-life care provision, the organisation that makes final decisions about NHS complaints in England has said.
The health ombudsman's report detailed "tragic" cases where people's suffering could have been avoided or lessened.
In one instance, a patient had suffered 14 painful attempts to have a drip reinserted during his final hours.
The government said improving end-of-life care was a priority.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has investigated 265 complaints about end-of-life care in the past four years, upholding just over half of them.

Catalogue of failings

Its Dying Without Dignity report said it had found too many instances of poor communication, along with poor pain management and inadequate out-of-hours services.
One mother told the ombudsman how she had had to call an A&E doctor to come and give her son more pain relief because staff on the palliative care ward he had been on had failed to respond to their requests.
In another case, a 67-year-old man's family learned of his terminal cancer diagnosis through a hospital note - before he knew himself. This "failed every principle of established good practice in breaking bad news", the report said.
"There was an avoidable delay in making a diagnosis," it added. "An earlier diagnosis would have meant opportunities for better palliative care."
Ombudsman Julie Mellor told Radio 4's Today the report made "very harrowing reading".
She also urged the NHS to learn lessons from the report, adding: "Our casework shows that too many people are dying without dignity.
"Our investigations have found that patients have spent their last days in unnecessary pain, people have wrongly been denied their wish to die at home, and that poor communication between NHS staff and families has meant that people were unable to say goodbye to their loved ones."

'Appalling cases'

Macmillan Cancer Support chief executive Lynda Thomas said: "The report cites heartbreaking examples of a lack of choice at the end of life that are totally unacceptable.
"If we are to improve the current situation, we will have to see a dramatic improvement in co-ordination of care, and greater integration of health and social care."
The chief inspector of hospitals at the Care Quality Commission, Prof Sir Mike Richards, said the organisation had seen examples of excellent end-of-life care, but also instances where it had not been given enough priority.
He said the CQC would continue to highlight those services that were failing.
A Department of Health spokesman said: "These are appalling cases - everyone deserves good quality care at the end of their lives.
"The five priorities for end-of-life care we brought in emphasise that doctors and nurses must involve patients and their families in decisions about their care, regularly review their treatment and share patients' choices to make sure their wishes are respected.
"NHS England is working on making these priorities a reality for everyone who needs end-of-life care."

Monday, 3 November 2014

NHS screening advice 'must improve'

NHS screening advice 'must improve'

Mammograms

Related Stories

The NHS needs to get better at highlighting the dangers of screening for diseases such as cancer, say MPs.
Screening picks up diseases early to improve the odds of survival or improve quality of life.
But the practice also leads to "overdiagnosis" and people having treatment for conditions which would never have caused harm.
The Science and Technology Committee accused the NHS of "poor communication" on the issue.
Breast-cancer screening became hugely controversial in 2012. An independent review was set up to settle a fierce debate about whether the measure did more harm than good.
It showed that for every life saved, three women had treatment for a cancer that would never have proved fatal.
As a result the leaflets given to women offered a mammogram included more information to give them an "informed choice".
'Unnecessary treatment'
However, the Science and Technology Committee argues the lessons have not been learned by those overseeing other screening programmes.
Andrew Miller, the committee chairman, said: "While screening can increase the likelihood of curing, preventing or delaying the progression of disease for some patients, for others it may lead to false results, misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment.
"More needs to be done to ensure that both the benefits and risks are clearly, and even-handedly, communicated so that people can make an informed choice about whether screening is right for them."
Conditions screened for include:
  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Breast cancer
  • Cervical cancer
  • Bowel cancer
There are also newborn screening programmes, including hearing checks, as well as Down's syndrome and foetal anomaly screens during pregnancy.
Breast-cancer screeningBreast-cancer screening guidelines were changed to ensure patients had an informed choice
Mr Miller continued: "Producing accurate, concise and accessible public information on screening will always be challenging, but the UK National Screening Committee must ensure there is standard process across the NHS for achieving this and facilitating informed choice."
There are hopes that screening could be extended to other diseases such as ovarian cancer and eventually prostate cancer.
However, the committee said the barriers to new screening programmes "should remain high" due to the delicate balance of risk and benefits.
'Vitally important'
Prof Kevin Fenton,, director of health and wellbeing at Public Health England, which oversees the NHS screening programmes. said: "We welcome the findings of the Science and Technology Committee's report, which has identified a number of recommendations.
"We will now consider these recommendations in full."
The British Medical Association's Dr Richard Vautrey said: "Many GPs will share the Science and Technology Committee's concerns about health screening. As the BMA has repeatedly warned, it is vitally important that people being invited for screening fully understand the pros and cons of the procedure.
"Patients must also be aware that there is a risk that false positive results could lead to unnecessary and potentially harmful further investigations."
Cancer Research UK was involved in the independent review of breast-cancer screening.
Jessica Kirby, from the charity, said: "It's vitally important that all screening programmes are based on the best possible evidence so people can be confident that screening is only offered where the benefits outweigh the harms.
"The report highlights the importance of ensuring people get the best possible information so they can make the decisions that are right for them."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Thursday, 22 May 2014

people in A&E lying in corridors

Hundreds of thousands of patients are being sent home from hospital in the middle of the night despite a promise to limit the practice.
During the past two years at least 300,000 people, many of them elderly, have been discharged between 11pm and 6am to relieve pressure on wards.
An investigation by The Times in 2012 revealed that patients were being woken and removed from their beds, even if they had no way of getting home. Some were left in night clothes, with no medication or paperwork, and in vulnerable or dangerous situations.
At the time, health chiefs promised that patients would be moved at night only in exceptional circumstances, but new figures obtained under a freedom of information request show that the practice remains just as widespread.
More than half of the NHS trusts that responded reported that the number of patients sent home at night had increased during the past three years. Almost 60,000 of the patients were over 75. The true number of patients discharged overnight is likely to be much higher because less than half of England’s 160 NHS trusts responded to the data request by Sky News.
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: “These figures are truly shocking. It is simply unacceptable that patients are being discharged from hospital late at night.
“We are particularly concerned that tens of thousands of these patients are aged over 75. For older people, spending time in hospital can be extremely distressing and disorientating.
“Patients need to be treated with care, compassion and dignity. For the many older people who live alone, being discharged after early evening shows not only a lack of care and thought, but can actually be dangerous.”
Nadra Ahmed, chairwoman of the National Care Association, said that elderly patients were returning home or arriving at care homes in disarray.
“They come out very often without the appropriate papers that would give information and the history of what has happened to them. Often they will come out without the appropriate medication, because the hospital pharmacy has closed, and there is no cross-referencing to what medication they’re already on.
“You’re also discharging them into the hands of night staff at care homes, when the manager or owner may not be there, so it’s creating an unplanned and chaotic atmosphere. They may find it disorientating and very distressing. We keep hearing these platitudes that things are so much better now. But I’ve heard of people being discharged with no clothes on, just a blanket around them, or wearing soiled incontinence pads that haven’t been changed. We’re not a third world nation.”
Two years ago, Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, medical director of the NHS, demanded that all hospitals review how they discharged patients, describing the practice of sending elderly people home in the middle of the night as unacceptable.
He said: “By and large the NHS is coping reasonably well, but there are times of peak admissions where there are real, significant pressure on beds. But the answer to that is not chucking people out in the middle of the night.”
Two months ago, he added that moving patients within hospitals at night struck at the heart of NHS efforts to “treat all patients with respect and compassion”. He ordered hospitals to review night-time ward transfers and stop all but the essential.
Dr Mike Smith, chairman of the Patients Association, said: “They have got people in A&E lying in corridors, they have got to be admitted and they have no beds. It’s for the convenience of staff and the person they are admitting but at the gross detriment to the person they are chucking out.”
NHS England said: “Discharging patients at night without appropriate support is unacceptable. The decision to do this should always be based on what is best for the patient

Friday, 25 October 2013

Quarter of hospitals 'at raised risk of poor care'

Quarter of hospitals 'at raised risk of poor care'

Sir Mike Richards from the Care Quality Commission said the screening tool would help identify higher risk hospitals

Related Stories

A quarter of hospital trusts in England are at raised risk of providing poor care, a review by the regulator shows.
The findings are based on monitoring by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) of a host of data, including death rates, serious errors and patient surveys.
It found 44 out of 161 trusts fell into the two highest risk categories.
The exercise has been carried out as part of the regulator's new hospital inspection regime, which will see inspectors go into every trust by 2015.
The first inspections got under way in September and by Christmas the first 18 will have been completed.

Analysis

This is the first time such comprehensive data has been pulled together in this way.
The work has involved the regulator poring over a mountain of data.
But what does it tell us? The Care Quality Commission is being careful to stress it is not a final rating. Instead, it is being dubbed a screening tool - and like any screening it can throw up erroneous results.
For example, the scoring system actually suggests two of the 11 trusts already placed in special measures should be in band three (medium risk) - although they have been bumped up to band one anyway.
But even taking that into account, it provides one of the clearest indications yet of how trusts are performing against each other.
Patients will undoubtedly be interested in the results until the inspection programme is completed.
It will result in every trust being given a rating of either 'outstanding', 'good', 'requires improvement' or 'inadequate' as part of a shake-up in the system ordered after the Stafford Hospital scandal.
The CQC said the latest information was not a final judgement, but would be used to prioritise which trusts to inspect earlier in the process.
Hospital chief inspector Prof Sir Mike Richards likened the risk review to a form of "screening".
He added: "Our intelligent monitoring helps to give us a good picture of risk within trusts, showing us where we need to focus our inspections."
The regulator has assessed each trust's performance against up to 150 different indicators.
Those performing worse than would be expected on each indicator get marked down as being at risk or elevated risk for that topic.
The number of risk scores they havedetermines which of the bands they are placed in.
Bands one and two - those at highest risk - include 24 trusts and 20 trusts respectively.
The trusts in band one include the 11 trusts already placed in special measures after a review of high mortality rates.
They are joined by Croydon Health Services, which was rated high risk in 12 areas for issues such as patient survey results and whistle-blowing.
Also in band one are Barking, Havering and Redbridge, which was rated high risk in 13 areas including A&E waits and patient surveys, and Aintree, rated high risk in 11 areas including an elevated risk for mortality rates.
How the highest risk trusts compare
Comparison of worst-scoring trusts
Health Foundation chief executive Dr Jennifer Dixon, who is also a CQC board member, said: "It makes sense to use the wealth of routinely available data in the NHS to try to spot patterns which might identify or predict poor quality care for patients.
"The intelligent monitoring tool can never by itself be a crystal ball, but it is a great start and will surely develop over time."
Dr Mark Porter, head of the British Medical Association, said publishing the data was an "important step" towards improving transparency across the NHS, informing and empowering patients and identifying under-performing hospitals.
Dr Mark Porter, Chair of the BMA, said the review was an "important step for the NHS"
But he added: "Hospitals are large, complex organisations so we need to avoid oversimplifying or reducing vast amounts of data to a simple band or rating."
Labour Shadow Health Minister Jamie Reed said: "David Cameron should be ashamed that he's put so many of England's hospitals in this position.
"He siphoned £3bn out of the NHS front-line to blow on a back-office re-organisation nobody voted for. Hospitals were left on a financial knife-edge and they are clearly struggling to maintain standards of patient care after more than three years of chaos."
But Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said: "Sadly, under the last government, a lack of transparency about poor care meant problems went unchecked for too long, some times with tragic consequences for patients.
"This government is being honest with the public about the quality of care at their local hospitals, and taking tough action where standards aren't up to scratch. Patients and staff deserve nothing less."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Monday, 16 September 2013

NHS patients 'should not face constant moves'

NHS patients 'should not face constant moves'

Hospital wardPatients often face multiple moves around hospital

Related Stories

The era of NHS patients being shunted around hospitals needs to end, an expert group says.
The Future Hospital Commission - set up by the Royal College of Physicians - said a radical revamp in structures was needed to bring care to the patient.
This was particularly true for frail people with complex needs, who often faced multiple moves once admitted to hospital, the report said.
It also recommended closer working with teams in the community.
The commission said this could involve doctors and nurses running clinics in the community and even visiting people in their own homes - as is already happening in a few places.
'Bold and refreshing'
It also called for an end to the concept of hospitals discharging patients.
Sir Mike Rawlins: "Hospital shouldn't stop at the walls of the building"
Instead, it argued that many of those seen in hospitals in the 21st Century needed ongoing care that did not end when they left hospital.
So the report recommended that planning for post-hospital care should happen as soon as someone is admitted.
Key to that will be a new hub that should be created in every hospital, called a clinical co-ordination centre, which would act as a central control room, helping to ensure information about patients is shared and their care planned properly.
Once in hospital, patients should not move beds unless their care demanded it, the report said.
That contrasts with the multiple moves many patients with complex conditions often find themselves facing as they are passed from specialism to specialism.
It said this would require a greater emphasis on general wards with specialists visiting patients rather than the other way round.

Case study

The longest Suzie Hughes, who has the auto-immune condition Lupus, has spent in hospital is 21 days.
During her stay, she was moved five times for non-clinical reasons.
"I would find myself being wheeled down the corridor with my flowers and chocolates. Nurses would be with me and I kept thinking, 'What a waste of their time.'
"And each time I arrived on a new ward I had to explain my condition again. The information does not get passed on and it results in delays."
The authors - drawn from across the NHS and social-care spectrum - also called for an end to the two-tier weekday and weekend service in many facilities.
They even said it would be preferable to work at 80% capacity across the seven days if extra resources were not available in the short-term.
Commission chairman Sir Michael Rawlins said it was about providing the care patients "deserved".
Alzheimer's Society chief executive Jeremy Hughes said too often hospitals were stressful places with patients being moved "from pillar to post".
"We need nothing less than a revolution... in order to ensure our NHS is fit for the future," he added.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the report was "bold and refreshing".
"I agree completely that we must make services more patient-centred both inside and outside hospital."
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said: "We must turn this system around and help support people where they want to be - at home with their family around them."

More on This Story

Related Stories

Friday, 14 June 2013

multiple failings in the home care

CCTV footage reveals domestic care neglect

Muriel Price and her grandsonMuriel's grandson says he feel guilty for employing the company

Related Stories

The BBC has obtained footage showing multiple failings in the home care provided by a company to one woman - as ministers warn the next abuse scandal may come in the sector.
The videos, recorded by the family of Muriel Price, 83, show carers failing to turn up for visits or turning up late, causing Mrs Price great distress.
The company involved say they were never informed the family had concerns.
They say the care of patients is of paramount importance to them.
Care minister Norman Lamb is hosting a summit with domiciliary care providers and carers on Thursday in an attempt to improve standards within the industry.
Mrs Price's grandson installed two CCTV cameras in her house in Blackpool, Lancashire, to monitor her movements and to provide help should she fall when she was home alone.
'Absolutely disgusting'
Instead they recorded carers failing to turn up when they should and behaving inappropriately on occasions.
One scene shows Mrs Price in great distress prior to her carer arriving. The grandmother, who is incontinent, had been in bed for 13 hours as her carer was nearly one hour late. She had tried and failed to contact her care company, carers, family and neighbours for help.
"Disgusting this is, absolutely disgusting," she is heard to cry out. "It's not good enough, I can't put up with it much longer."
One piece of video shows Mrs Price becoming increasingly distressed as she waits for her carer to arrive
She then quietly sobs before crying out for Les, her husband of 63 years. He was her primary carer prior to his death.
"I'll be here till 12 o'clock until the next one comes along, I bet. It's always the same."
Eventually a carer does appear, 55 minutes late.

Start Quote

Mosaic go above and beyond their legal requirements when employing carers to ensure all staff are capable of delivering quality care to their clients. The care of patients is of paramount importance to Mosaic.”
Mosaic Community Care
In the footage seen by the BBC, which covers a period of nearly a month, carers turn up late or not at all on at least 12 occasions. Several other visits are much shorter than the one hour the carers are contracted for.
While some carers were professional, the footage shows examples of others who clearly were not.
The footage shows one carer sticking her fingers in food to check its temperature, another changes incontinence pads in full view of the street.
'No dignity'
And though Mrs Price is an insulin dependent diabetic with special dietary requirements, one carers admits to not being able to cook. "I can't fry an egg. I am really that rubbish at cooking. Why they send me to people at dinner time; it's beyond me," she can be heard saying.
"The way they treat old people is wrong, just wrong," says Mrs Price, looking back on her experience. "You'd be waiting for your tea and you didn't get any tea cause they never turned up, they never bothered. And you'd ring them up and they'd say we'll be sending someone along but they never did."
Her grandson, Darryl Price, who arranged for the care company to look after Mrs Price, looks back with regret.
"To see someone in your family treated with no respect, no dignity, you question yourself and in a way you feel guilty. You're the one who's put that home care company in there, you've trusted this company to look after them."
Another clip captures examples of poor care - including this carer, who was later disciplined by the company, who 'mooned' at the camera
The BBC showed the footage to Norman Lamb ahead of his meeting with domiciliary care providers and carers. He said the current system resulted too often in poor care, low wages and neglect.
"It's just shocking and depressing because this is neglect in your own home," said Mr Lamb in reaction to the videos.
Talking about the wider domiciliary care sector, he went on: "We know this is not an isolated case. There is some very good care, and we should celebrate that, but where poor care exists we should not tolerate it."
He later told BBC News: "In a way you're almost at your most vulnerable when it's behind a closed door, it's you and a care worker and potentially poor things, dreadful things can happen in those circumstances."
He said a number of companies were failing to provide a complete service and all too often councils were taking part in a "race to the bottom", choosing the cheapest bid when awarding contracts.
Norman Lamb: "I want to shine a spotlight on this whole sector"
The company who provided Mrs Price's care is Mosaic Community Care, based in Preston. The family say they repeatedly contacted the company with their concerns and have provided phone records to the BBC which indicate that calls were made.
But in a statement, Mosaic said it was an award-winning care provider.
It went on: "At no time were any issues raised with Mosaic by the family. Any concerns would have been dealt with via the appropriate channels.
"Mosaic go above and beyond their legal requirements when employing carers to ensure all staff are capable of delivering quality care to their clients. The care of patients is of paramount importance to Mosaic."
Referring to the telephone records, it says: "The length of a call does not provide conclusive evidence as to the content of the call."
Muriel Price is now happily living in a care home. "I'm lucky I have a family to look after me," she says. "Those that haven't got a family, God help them, poor devils."

More on This Story

Related Stories

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...