Speaking exclusively to the BBC, Dr Peter Wilson, paediatric intensive care consultant at Southampton General Hospital,

Ashya King: Southampton hospital staff criticise parents

By David FentonHealth correspondent, BBC South Today10 April 2015

• t

Jump media player

Media player help

Out of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue.

Media captionAshya King was taken out of hospital by his parents to receive proton beam therapy abroad

Doctors and nurses who treated cancer patient Ashya King have criticised his parents while speaking out for the first time in a BBC documentary.

Ashya was being treated in hospital in Southampton when his parents took him abroad without telling staff last year.

They ignored medical advice and took him to Prague for proton beam therapy.

It was later revealed Ashya did not receive subsequent chemotherapy in Prague, a move the team in Southampton say could jeopardise his recovery.

Speaking exclusively to the BBC, Dr Peter Wilson, paediatric intensive care consultant at Southampton General Hospital, said: "We are unsure as to exactly what treatment he is receiving but what we do know is... every month that goes by that he's not getting chemotherapy, his outcome worsens.

Dr Peter Wilson and other members of the medical team received hate mail

"There are experts in the country that have already quoted figures of halving survival - so survival going from 80% to 40% or 50%, which is quite dramatic."

The Kings' version of events last year sparked a public outcry and staff members in Southampton said they received angry emails, letters and phone calls which, at one stage, forced the hospital to shut its switchboard.

The King family, who in March said five-year-old Ashya was now cancer free, declined to be interviewed as part of the BBC programme.

Has Ashya been cured?

In March, four months after the proton treatment ended, Brett King told a national newspaper a recent scan showed "no evidence" of the tumour.

But cancer experts have told the BBC although it appears Ashya is in remission it is far too early to say he has been completely cured.

Oncology specialist Professor Karol Sikora said: "Ashya is not completely out of the woods yet, but 78% of children with this type of rare cancer actually survive and are cured.

"The fact he is disease free at this point is great, but it doesn't mean he is cured yet."

The breakdown in the relationship between Brett King and the hospital stemmed from his belief that Ashya should not receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy following surgery to remove a brain tumour.

Mr King claimed in a YouTube video that staff threatened him with a court order if he refused Ashya's treatment, something the hospital has denied.

He told journalists in Spain after his arrest: "They were going to kill him in England or turn him into a vegetable."

Brett King made accusations against the hospital in a YouTube video

Key events

• Ashya had surgery for a medulloblastoma brain tumour at Southampton General Hospital in July 2014
• His parents, Brett and Naghemeh, removed him from the hospital on 28 August and sparked a manhunt when they travelled to Spain
• They were arrested but later released and Ashya was flown to Prague, Czech Republic, for proton beam treatment
• He had six weeks of proton beam therapy, which cost between £60,000 and £65,000, according to the treatment centre, and was paid for by the NHS
• Ashya returned to hospital in Spain
• In March, Brett King announced his son was free of cancer

Through the media, the King family raised tens of thousands of pounds for Ashya's treatment before the NHS agreed to pay for proton therapy in Prague.

Dr Nicky Thorp, of the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group of paediatricians, said: "We were dismayed, but on reflection I can see why NHS England agreed to fund that child's case. The child was there, the child needed radiotherapy.

"The use of protons does not improve cure rates of tumours... and it saddens me to see the way the truth can be twisted and misunderstood."

Southampton General Hospital received abuse on social media

In Prague, Ashya's parents refused the chemotherapy, which had been recommended by doctors and ordered by the High Court.

But in March, four months after the proton treatment ended, Mr King said his son was cancer free.

Paediatric oncology consultant Dr Ramya Ramanujachar, who was involved in Ashya's treatment, warned the case could set a worrying precedent.

Dr Ramya Ramanujachar accused the Kings of "dictating" their son's treatment

She said: "I don't think the parents can look after their own child with a brain tumour and be not only the carers but also the professionals directing, managing and dictating their child's treatment."

Dr Wilson said the case had led to an "impossible situation" for clinicians faced with families in the same situation.

"That is deeply unfair when the NHS is always supposed to be about equal healthcare for all," he added.

Ashya: The Untold Story is to be broadcast on BBC1 in the South region on Friday at 19:30 BST.

Share this story 

Care system gets 'biggest shake-up in 60 years'

 England are being introduced in what is being dubbed the biggest shake-up for 60 years.

The Care Act 2014 includes rights for those receiving care and those who provide it to their loved ones.

It includes standards for access to services from care homes to help in the home for tasks such as washing and dressing.

Meanwhile, NHS and care budgets are being merged in Scotland.

The Public Bodies (Joint Working) Act has been described as the most substantial reform north of the border for a generation.

It effectively forces councils and the NHS to work together to provide more streamlined services.

That aim is also a major topic of debate in England in the election campaign with the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP and Greens all having plans for greater integration.

Policy guide: Health and care

This issue includes NHS funding, GP access and social care, particularly of older people.

Compare parties' policies

But the changes coming into force in England on Wednesday apply only to the care system for older people and younger adults with disabilities.

Four major changes are being introduced:

• The creation of national eligibility criteria establishing for the first time when someone should be entitled to help - to date, it has been up to councils to set their own criteria
• A duty on councils to offer schemes by which those who need to pay for residential care can get a loan from their local council, which is then paid back from their estate after death
• Giving carers for the first time the same right to assessment and support as the people they care for; before, they had to provide "substantial care on a regular basis" to get an assessment
• Those who pay for care themselves will be entitled to go to councils to get advice and information about the care system.

To help protect people's assets, a cap on care costs they have to pay for - set at £72,000 for the over-65s - will kick in from April next year. How the cap works for younger people has still to be finalised.

Today's changes, however, still mark a major milestone in care services, which experts say have hardly changed since the current system was created along with the NHS after the Second World War.

BBC Cost of Care project

The BBC has launched an online guide to the care system for the over-65s. The "care calculator" covers residential care and the support provided in people's own homes, for tasks such as washing and dressing.

Users can submit their postcode and find out how much each service costs where they live in the UK.

There is also a dedicated BBC Cost of Care website, with news stories, analysis and video.

• The care calculator
• Cost of Care website
• How the systems differ in the UK
• England's care cap explained

David Pearson, president of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, said the changes were "probably the most significant development" since 1948.

But he said there were still issues to resolve on the underfunding of the system. Unlike the NHS, the care system budget has been cut in real terms this Parliament.

Izzi Seccombe, leader of Warwickshire council, who chairs the Local Government Association's Wellbeing Board, agreed with both points.

"Councils simply cannot afford any more financial burdens when social care services are already chronically underfunded," she said.

Janet Morrison, of the charity Independent Age, said the Care Act had the "potential to revolutionise" services.

But she said: "With a rapidly ageing population, we need an honest debate during and after the election about the true costs of care."

Share this story

Office workers 'too sedentary'

1. Office workers 'too sedentary'
2. By James Gallagher
3. Health editor, BBC News website

1. comments
2. 
   
3. 
4. Office workers need to get off their backsides and move around more, according to a new campaign.
5. On Your Feet Britain says sitting for long periods at work is linked to a host of health problems, which are not undone by working out in the gym.
6. It is calling on people to stand regularly, walk around more and embrace ideas such as standing meetings or standing desks.
7. Experts described inactivity as "one of the biggest" challenges in health.
8. Heart disease, type 2 diabetes, cancers and poor mental health have all been linked to sedentary behaviour.
9. The effect is found even in people who class themselves as fit, such as those who cycle to work, if they also spend long periods of time sitting.
10. Prolonged sitting is thought to slow the metabolism and affect the way the body controls sugar levels, blood pressure and the breakdown of fat.
11. The campaign is a partnership between the group Get Britain Standing and the British Heart Foundation (BHF) charity.
12. Their survey of 2,000 office workers suggested:

1. 45% of women and 37% of men spend less than 30 minutes a day up on their feet at work
2. More than half regularly eat their lunch at their desk
3. 78% office workers felt they spent too much time sitting down
4. Nearly two-thirds were worried sitting at work was having a negative impact on their health
5. Gavin Bradley, from Get Britain Standing, told the BBC News website: "We're all victims of our environment, we've taken a lot of activity out of the workplace and we're sitting longer and longer.
6. "We need new and innovative ways of addressing the issue.
7. "Stand up when you're on the phone or in meetings, do everything you can to avoid sitting."
8. Office inactivity
9. 5.2lb(2.4kg)
10. estimated amount of weight that can be lost by standing up for an extra 30 minutes a day for a year

1. 37% of men spend less than 30 minutes a day up on their feet at work
2. 45% of women spend less than 30 minutes a day up on their feet at work
3. 50% regularly eat their lunch at their desk
4. Source: Get Britain Standing and British Heart Foundation
5. Getty Images
6. Other ideas including using the stairs instead of a lift, eating lunch away from your desk, taking a break from your computer every 30 minutes and walking to a colleague's desk rather than phoning or emailing them.
7. Get Britain Standing says standing burns an extra 50 calories per hour than being seated.
8. Dr Mike Loosemore, head of exercise medicine at University College Hospital, told the BBC: "Inactivity and sedentary behaviour is one of the biggest challenges we have in public health today.
9. "Compared with 100 years ago, our levels of activity are tiny, the number of manual jobs are continually reducing, even if you dig a road up you sit in a little tractor.
10. "It's about changing attitudes to how people behave at work and changing the culture of the workplace that just means moving around at little bit more, even just standing up can make a big difference to calories burned and how alert, creative and productive you are."
11. 
    
12. 
13. Lisa Young, project manager for the BHF's Health at Work programme, said: "We're all guilty of being too glued to our screens sometimes, but these results show just how far the couch potato culture has infiltrated the workplace.
14. "Too many of us are tied to our desks at work, which could be increasing our risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
15. "That's why we want workers to get up and get moving on 24 April and take a stand against cardiovascular disease.
16. "A bit of healthy competition in the workplace could go a long way to reversing this trend whilst raising vital funds for our ground-breaking research."

middle-aged men

Fit middle-aged men 'at lower risk for some cancers'
27 March 2015

 

• From the section

• Health

Even small changes in fitness levels could reduce the risk of developing cancer, the study suggested

Your health behaviours and your fitness earlier in life has an impact 20 or 30 years later - and that's what people don't realise.
Dr Susan Lakoski, University of Vermont
Treadmill test

Getting fit and staying fit are important early on in life - for men's overall health

Long-term impactBeing regularly physically active is great for your overall health and, as this study demonstrates, has benefits far beyond the health of your heart
Tom Stansfeld, Cancer Research UK
Share this story About sharing

Very fit men in their late 40s are less likely to get lung cancer and colorectal cancer than unfit men, a study in JAMA Oncology suggests.

Their high fitness levels also appear to increase their chances of surviving cancer if they are diagnosed later on.

University of Vermont researchers said even small improvements in fitness could help to reduce cancer risk.

Cancer Research UK said investigating links between men's fitness levels and cancer risk was a new approach.

Being physically active and eating a healthy, balanced diet are already known to be important factors in reducing people's risk of developing cancer and other diseases.

But study author Dr Susan Lakoski said it would be more beneficial to tell people how much they needed to improve their fitness in order to reduce their risk of cancer to acceptable levels.

This could come in the form of a personalised plan, which should start with measuring their cardio-respiratory fitness.

This study of 14,000 men aged between 46 and 50, in Texas, tested their cardio-respiratory fitness levels at the outset by making them run on a treadmill to the point of exhaustion.

After that, their fitness levels were regularly tested over an average of six and a half years between 1971 and 2009.

Between 1999 and 2009, 1,310 of the men had been diagnosed with prostate cancer, 200 with lung cancer and 181 with colorectal cancer.

The study found that the men with high levels of fitness in middle-age reduced their risk of lung cancer by 55% and their risk of colorectal cancer by 44%, compared with the men with low levels of fitness - those who took more than 12 minutes to run or walk a mile.

However, the study found that the fit men in middle age did not appear to reduce their risk of prostate cancer.

The authors said the exact reasons for this were unknown but men with high cardio-respiratory fitness may be better at looking after their health and therefore more likely to undergo screening for prostate cancer, making them more likely to be diagnosed.

Dr Lakoski said fitness prior to a cancer diagnosis was important.

"This preventative message starts earlier than you think, way before you develop cancer.

"Your health behaviours and your fitness earlier in life has an impact 20 or 30 years later - and that's what people don't realise."

In the study, she said as long as people were above the low-fitness category, they already had a lot of advantages.

Tom Stansfeld, health information officer at Cancer Research UK, said: "Investigating links between men's fitness levels and cancer risk, rather than just the amount of physical activity they do, is a new approach.

"The results reconfirm the benefit of physical activity in decreasing men's risk of bowel cancer.

"Interestingly, the study also found a positive effect of fitness on reducing lung cancer risk, but more research is needed to understand this potential link better."

He said other research in women had shown that increased levels of exercise could reduce the risk of breast and womb cancers.

He added: "Being regularly physically active is great for your overall health and, as this study demonstrates, has benefits far beyond the health of your heart."