Wednesday, 27 March 2013

No more covering up errors, NHS told


No more covering up errors, NHS told

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt: "Stafford Hospital to be ''a catalyst for change''
The NHS will have a legal duty to be honest about mistakes as part of an overhaul of the system in the wake of the Stafford Hospital scandal.
The move is part of a package of measures in England to put patients at the heart of the NHS, ministers said.
There will also be a new ratings system for hospitals and care homes, while changes to nurse training will be piloted.
It comes after the public inquiry claimed patients had been "betrayed".
The harrowing neglect and abuse at the hospital between 2005 to 2008 which led to needless deaths has already been well documented.
Statistics at the time showed there were between 400 and 1,200 more deaths than would be expected.
The £13m inquiry, published at the start of February, focused on why the problems were not picked up sooner.
It accused the NHS of putting corporate self-interest ahead of patients, concluding the failings went from the top to the bottom of the system.
'Fundamental change'
In total, the report made 290 recommendations.
Ministers have not responded individually to each one.
But Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the response on Tuesday marked the start of a "fundamental change to the system".

Government response at a glance

  • Duty of candour to be placed on NHS boards to be honest about mistakes.
  • Consideration being given to making individual doctors and nurses criminally responsible for covering up errors.
  • New ratings system for hospitals and care homes based on Ofsted scheme used in schools.
  • Posts of chief inspector of hospitals and care homes to be created.
  • Nurses to spend up to a year working as a healthcare assistant so they get experience providing basic care such as washing and dressing in pilot schemes.
  • Managers who fail in their jobs to be barred from holding such positions in the future.
  • Code of conduct and minimum training standards for healthcare assistants, but not full registration scheme as recommended by inquiry.
  • Tough rules to be drawn up to allow trusts to be put into administration when basic standards are not met unless problems can be resolved quickly.
  • Department of Health civil servants to be forced to spend time on the front line of the NHS.
"We cannot merely tinker around the edges - we need a radical overhaul with high quality care and compassion at its heart."
He said he wanted to create a culture of "zero harm" through the changes.
Key to this will be the new post of chief inspector of hospitals - announced immediately after the publication of the public inquiry - and the statutory duty of the NHS to be honest about mistakes, known as a duty of candour.
But the government said it would wait before deciding whether to make individual doctors and nurses criminally accountable for hiding mistakes as recommended by the inquiry as it was concerned about creating a "culture of fear".
The government has also stopped short of the inquiry's demand for a registration system for health care assistants.
Instead, it confirmed it will push ahead with a code of conduct and minimum training standards.
On training for nurses, ministers said there would be a pilot programme whereby nurses will have to work for up to a year as a healthcare assistant before getting NHS funding for their degree.
Meanwhile, managers who fail in their jobs will be barred from holding such positions in the future.
Heather Wilhelms describes how her husband had to resort to drinking from a vase while in hospital
The ratings system, which will start being rolled out later this year, will be based on the Ofsted system used in schools.
Hospital and care homes will be given an outstanding, good, requiring improvement or poor rating.
However, in hospitals individual departments will be given their own rating as well to reflect the increased complexity of the organisations.
But shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the culture of the NHS would not be changed unless staffing problems were resolved first.
"We will never get the right culture on our wards if they are understaffed and overstretched," Mr Burnham said.
Royal College of Nursing general secretary Peter Carter agreed staffing was an issue and said he was disappointed there would not be a registration system for healthcare assistants.
He also said he had concerns about the measures on nurse training, but added the the union was still "committed" to working with government to ensure a "patient-centred NHS becomes a reality".
But Don Redding, policy director of the patient group National Voices, felt the changes would make a difference, particularly the duty of candour.
"In cases where patients have been harmed or worse, both senior managers and their legal advisers have generally decided their first duty is to the interests of the trust. This new legal duty will rebalance that."
Mike Farrar, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents health trusts, said: "The government has used this time to produce an overarching response rather than a something which tries to tick all the boxes.
"The response finds the right balance between external assurance measures and internal changes focused on transforming the NHS culture."
Robert Francis QC, who chaired the public inquiry, added: "Even though it is clear that it does not accept all my recommendations, the government's statement indicates its determination to make positive changes to the culture of the NHS."

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Friday, 22 March 2013

Ageism


Ageism in politics is 'pathetic' says Cable

William Gladstone aged 71William Gladstone became prime minister aged 82 in 1892
Vince Cable has criticised ageism in modern-day politics, pointing out that Churchill and Gladstone served as prime minister in their 70s and 80s.
The Lib Dem business secretary, who is 69, said he would stand for election again in two years time and had "bags of energy and stamina" left.
Questioning politicians' ability to do the job because of their age was "pathetic", he told the House magazine.
He suggested Deng Xiaoping, who ruled China in his 80s, was a role model.
Mr Cable briefly served as Lib Dem leader after Sir Menzies Campbell quit in 2007 and has not ruled out the possibility of standing for the top job in future should a vacancy arise.
During his 18-month stint as leader, Sir Menzies faced questions about his age and ability to cope with the demands of the 24-hour news cycle.
'Bags of energy'
Mr Cable said his colleague had been "very unfairly treated" at the time.
"It was as bad as attacking people for their colour, for their gender. Pathetic actually, it demeaned the people who did it."
Mr Cable confirmed that he would stand to be an MP again in the next election, scheduled for 2015, and had no "inhibitions" about doing so.
"I take the view that as long as you have got bags of stamina and capacity to do the job and I do have a lot of energy and stamina, I'm perfectly fit and healthy."
Asked about role models, he said Lord Heseltine was still active in politics and business in his late 70s while two of the country's greatest leaders had remained in No 10 long after conventional retirement age.
"Gladstone became prime minister when he was over 80, didn't he? I think Churchill was over 70, wasn't he?"
He added: "Talking of role models, Deng Xiaoping totally transformed China in the last century. I think he was 80 when he took over. And he survived the Long March."
Mr Cable - who was a Labour activist and councillor before joining the SDP in the 1980s, said he had a "sensible working relationship" with Labour but his party would adopt a policy of "equidistance" between them and their Conservative coalition partners at the next election.
"That will be the word Paddy Ashdown invented once upon a time and it will be the case next time," he added.
"It will make the point that in the national interest we are willing to work with other parties on either side."

Friday, 8 March 2013

Nurse regulator 'not good enough'

Nurse regulator 'not good enough'

Nurses at workIt is illegal to work as a nurse or midwife without being on the NMC register

Related Stories

The regulator for nurses and midwives is still not doing enough to protect patients properly, MPs are warning.
The Health Select Committee said a huge backlog of cases was hampering the ability of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) to safeguard standards.
The cross-party group of MPs also highlighted the regulator's poor record of having decisions overturned on appeal.
But the NMC said it was working hard to put things right.
The regulator, which is in charge of registering and regulating the 670,000 nurses and midwives in the UK, has been dogged by problems for some time.
Last year year an independent report by the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence said the NMC was failing at "every level".
This report recognised progress was being made by the new management team, but that there was a "serious gap between current performance and acceptable standards".
It noted the NMC had a backlog of cases dating back more than two years that topped 570.
It said this needed to be cleared by June.
It also expressed disappointment that the rollout of revalidation - regular checks on nurses - was being delayed by 2015. It has already started for doctors.
Challenges ahead
And the MPs said much more needed to be done to tackle two of the major underlying causes of the problems - IT and staff turnover.
It also urged the regulator to be more ambitious in its plans for dealing with cases.
Its current proposal is that the average should take no longer than 18 months, but MPs said it should be half this.
Committee chairman Stephen Dorrell said: "The NMC's job is to protect patient safety by registering nurses and midwives and by enforcing acceptable standards of practice.
"The simple fact is that in recent years it has fallen down on that task."
NMC chief executive Jackie Smith said: "We welcome the report, which recognises the genuine progress we are making, and challenges us to do better.
"We don't underestimate the challenges ahead."

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Jeremy Hunt attacks 'complacent' hospitals


Jeremy Hunt attacks 'complacent' hospitals

By Nick Triggle

Mr Hunt said his words were aimed at the bulk of hospitals that were not excellent and not poor

Related Stories

nursesToo many hospitals are coasting along, settling for meeting minimum standards, according to the health secretary.
In a speech on Friday, Jeremy Hunt will attack a culture of "complacency" and "low aspirations", which he believes is holding the NHS in England back.
He is expected to say while there is a concerted effort to tackle failing hospitals, there should also be a focus on "mediocrity".
Labour's Andy Burnham blamed ministers for the failings in front line care.
Mr Hunt's comments come a month after the problems at Stafford Hospital were laid bare.
The final report of the public inquiry into the scandal, published at the start of February, attacked the way the system protected corporate self-interest rather than putting patients first.
The warnings have already led to investigations into 14 hospital trusts with high death rates.
But Mr Hunt, in a speech to the Nuffield Trust think-tank in Dorking, Surrey, will say part of the challenge is tackling "mediocrity and low expectations before they turn into failure and tragedy".

So how many hospitals are mediocre?

The health secretary will make it clear in his speech that he is not saying the vast majority are mediocre, but according to sources his words are aimed at a significant bulk of those plodding along in the middle.
It is commonly said about a 10th of hospital trusts are failing, although double that are actually not meeting all the essential standards set out by the Care Quality Commission.
That leaves about 80% of trusts that are doing what they should. Some of these will be excellent - perhaps about 10-15% - and some will be striving to become excellent - perhaps a similar number. That leaves close to half that could be said to be stuck in the middle, coasting along.
'Complacency'
"Coasting can kill. Not straight away, but over time as complacency sets in, organisations look inwards, standards drop and then suddenly something gives," he will say.
"I would never describe the majority of hospitals or wards in the NHS as mediocre - but I do believe our system fails to challenge low aspirations in too many parts of the system.
"Imagine for a moment that the main objective for our Olympic athletes was not to win but to 'not come last'. How many gold medals would we have won then?
"It sounds ridiculous doesn't it? But today I want to suggest that too much of the NHS is focused on doing just that.
"Not on achieving world class levels of excellence - the gold medals of healthcare - but meeting minimum standards, the equivalent of 'not coming last'."
Sources said Mr Hunt's words were aimed not at those that are failing minimum standards or waiting time targets, but the bulk in the middle that were not excellent and not poor.
Family test
He is expected to single out Walsall Manor, a hospital in the West Midlands, which has turned itself around after faring badly in the national patients' survey two years ago. The hospital decided to carry out one-to-one interviews with 100 patients to find out what they thought of their care and the staff that looked after them.
On the Today programme, Richard Kirby, chief executive of Walsall NHS Healthcare Trust, said this led to investment in specific areas flagged up by patients and a better understanding of what patients want. The Trust has also introduced a friends and family test.
"Every patient who is admitted to our hospital is asked when leaving if they would recommend us to friends and family and scores are shared with all of our teams week in, week out.
Jo Webber from the NHS Confederation: ''People come to do the best they possibly can for patients''
"We get critical and positive responses. It gives us a simple, clear way of understanding how we are doing."
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said the health secretary was right to draw attention to the issue.
"There is a malaise in the NHS which has allowed mediocrity to become commonplace," she said.
"We hear from patients every day who are not happy with their care. I am not talking about the really bad, just those that are not putting patients first."
Investment
But shadow health secretary Mr Burnham said it was "no good for ministers to blame hospitals and staff when it is they who have thrown the whole system into chaos with a huge re-organisation, which has siphoned £3bn out of front line care.
Shadow Health Secretary Andy Burnham: "Coasting is the last thing hospitals are doing - they are working flat out."
"Hospitals across England are on a knife-edge and they need a government that provides support rather than points the finger," he said.
Royal College of Nursing director general Peter Carter said: "From one perspective I absolutely agree with him, of course we don't want mediocrity.
"But to make sure that does not happen we need to invest in staff. When we won one gold medal in the 1996 Olympics we started investing in our athletes, rowers and cyclists.
"To achieve gold medal standards in the NHS we need to do the same. It requires proper leadership, time to train and appropriate pay."
Mike Farrar, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said there was room for improvement, adding hospitals needed to be more open and transparent.
"I believe that there is a crucial opportunity to make this culture change happen. We cannot miss this chance to deliver better care."

Monday, 25 February 2013

Why has Romania got such a bad public image?


Why has Romania got such a bad public image?

Composite of images from romania
The Romanian Prime Minister Victor Ponta has defended his country after a wave of negative reporting about it in the UK and elsewhere in Europe. Why does it have a bad public image?
Of course, it had to be Romania.
You could almost sense the relief for some when, in the midst of the horsemeat scandal, the finger of blame was pointed at abattoirs in an eastern European state.
Now it made sense. Cue stock footage of gypsy horse and carts and knowing references to organised crime.
Except, of course, there is no evidence that any horsemeat left Romania labelled as anything other than horsemeat.
But slurs about horsemeat are just the latest in a long line of public relations problems to have hit Romania.
Students and young professionals from Romania talk about living and working in the UK - and whether they plan to return home
The country's prime minister, Victor Ponta, has this week been forced to launch an all-out charm offensive over fears about a flood of immigrants when the EU opens its labour market to his country, and neighbouring Bulgaria, on 1 January 2014.
Headlines such as "The Mafia bosses who can't wait to flood Britain with beggars", "We want to get into your country before someone locks the door" and "An immigration calamity looms" have incensed Romanians living in the UK.
On Friday, the country's ambassador to London, Ion Jinga, claimed such "alarmist" and "inflammatory" coverage could lead to Romanians being assaulted in the street.
He argues that all the Romanians who want to work in the UK are already there, on work permits or self-employed.

Romania - facts and figures

Romanian parliament
  • Area of 148,000 sq miles (238,400 sq km) and population of 21.4m people
  • Under Communist rule from end of WWII to 1989 when ruler Nicolae Ceausescu was deposed and shot
  • Joined Nato in 2004; became EU member in 2007 - current president Traian Basescu
In an article in the Times, the Romanian prime minister strikes a more emollient tone, inviting Britons to come and enjoy a "strong pint" in Bucharest's Old Town or a "quiet holiday" in the sleepy Transylvanian villages beloved by Prince Charles.
Improved job rates in Romania mean that "Britain can rest assured", he writes.
This argument cuts little ice with Migration Watch chairman, former diplomat Sir Andrew Green, who says the presence of a settled Romanian population in the UK is a "pull factor" that will encourage more to make the journey.
The press has seized on a report by Migration Watch claiming 50,000 Romanians a year will travel to the UK when working restrictions are lifted.
Migration Watch's chairman cites events from 2004, when the government grossly under-estimated the number of migrants that would travel from new EU states such as Poland. The government said there would be net immigration of between 5,000 and 13,000 a year. In fact, 2011 Census data showed the Polish population alone had risen in England and Wales from 58,000 in 2001 to 579,000 10 years later.
Romania has been trying to reshape its image for some time. The government has launched a number of advertising and PR campaigns in recent years aimed at improving the country's perception abroad.
In 2011, it launched a global "Why I Love Romania" poster campaign, trumpeting the achievements of famous Romanians such as tennis player Ilie Nastase, gymnast Nadia Comanenci and scientist Nicolae Paulescu, who discovered insulin.
Last year, it launched a campaign to attract more tourists to the Carpathian Mountains, which was much mocked in the Romanian press.
Romanian abbatoirDid stories about horsemeat play up to prejudices about Romania?
And a Romanian ad agency, GMP, has produced tongue-in-cheek ads hitting back at, so far unfounded, claims that the UK is considering a campaign to deter Romanians from coming to the UK.
The proposed Why Don't You Come Over? campaign in Romania features slogans such as "We speak better English than anywhere you've been in France" and "Charles bought a house here in 2005. And Harry has never been photographed naked once."
Map of Romania
The campaign slogan is: "We may not like Britain, but you will love Romania."
Ronnie Smith, a British business consultant based in Romania, says the UK "ought to be ashamed" of its coverage of Romania but he does not believe the country's government has the resources, or the will, to respond effectively.
"There is not a rebranding campaign. There should be but there won't be, not to the extent that's needed," he says.
Romania's image problem may even be traceable to the late 19th Century, when travellers returned from Transylvania with tales of a strange, forbidding land, says Dr James Koranyi, a history lecturer at Durham University.

What about Bulgaria?

About 53,000 Bulgarians already live in the UK, with work permits or self-employed.
Bulgaria's ambassador in London, Konstantin Dimitrov, says: "We have identified elements of a negative campaign against Bulgarians and Bulgarian people - both those living in Bulgaria and those residing in the UK.
"We don't see any sociological basis for such exaggerated stories. They are either done for financial reasons or are a deliberate effort to misinform the British people."
"Just as Dracula sucked the blood of the young English women Mina and Lucy, so, too, are Romanians accused of taking British jobs and sucking the welfare state dry," writes Koranyi in an article for Open Democracy.
But most observers believe Romania's recent past, as a Communist dictatorship, looms far larger in the public mind.
For many people in the West, images of children abandoned in Soviet-era orphanages are the first thing they associate with Romania, says Liam Lever, a British journalist who writes for English-language Romanian news site Romania Insider.
Like other members of the growing expatriate British community in Romania, he believes outdated stereotypes are holding the country back.
"When you say you are going to Romania, people look at you with shock and horror, as if you are going to some place where there is no law and order and bandits roaming in the hills.
"The reality is something quite different."
Like its smaller neighbour Bulgaria, Romania remains one of the most corrupt countries in Europe, according to Transparency International, despite EU-inspired efforts to clean up its political system.
It has also been singled out for criticism by Amnesty International for its prejudicial treatment of the Roma community, who make up 10% of the country's population.
Construction of highwayThere is poverty in Romania but the economy is growing...
Little wonder, say critics, that the Roma have relocated in their thousands to other EU countries, including the UK.
There have been newspaper stories in the UK pointing to Romanian involvement in certain type of crime, with allegations that 92% of cash machine scams are carried out by nationals. Ten Romanian police officers were sent to London last year to help tackle begging and anti-social behaviour
But Romania's image as a violent "mafia state" among some commentators is far wide of the mark, its defenders point out.
Violent crime in Bucharest is among the lowest of any capital city in Europe, according to figures compiled by The UN Office on Drugs and Crime.
The country's economy is also growing faster than the UK and there are plenty of opportunities for entrepreneurs, according to the British business people based there.
Ambassador Jinga has said the 68,000 Romanians already living in the UK are the best advert for his country.
The vast majority are aged under 35 and are in highly skilled or shortage professions. Six thousand are studying at British universities.
Rolls Royce with Romanian numberplate... and wages have risen
Brought up on idealised images of the West, they are bemused, and in some cases, angry at the British media's portrayal of their country.
Unlike Poland, which forged close ties with the UK during World War II, Romania had few links with the UK before the fall of Communism.
"We do have very different cultures," says Carmen Campeanu, a project manager at the Romanian Cultural Centre, in Central London. "We are a Latin country. Statistics show Romanians would prefer to go to Italy or Spain or Portugal or even France."
Stefan Rusud, a 24-year-old management student, says the media storm over immigration has not changed his view of the UK, a country he has always regarded as "a temple of democracy".
Adrian Cherciu, who runs a business importing Romanian food, says he has had to put up with a lot of horsemeat jokes from his British friends in recent weeks.
But he is not worried by "anti-Romanian" press coverage, as it does not fit with his own experience as a British resident and, since 2004, the owner of Romani Online, a website for Romanians in the UK.
"There is no prejudice based on your colour, your religion or nationality," he says

Romanian orphans 1989, the outside world first saw images of tens of thousands of abandoned children living in cramped, filthy institutions across the country.


Editor's note: Following the Christmas Day execution of Romania’s long-time communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu in 1989, the outside world first saw images of tens of thousands of abandoned children living in cramped, filthy institutions across the country.
Ceausescu’s policies — including outlawing abortion and birth control and dictating that every woman bear a minimum of five children — had created a generation of children that were cared for by the state.
Many didn’t survive. But nearly a quarter of a century later, those who did are now young adults.
This is the second of a two-part series that takes a look at two young men who lead very different lives as they navigate society on the outside today.
BUCHAREST, Romania — Eight years ago, Gabriel Ciobotaru didn’t know how he would avoid living on the streets, let alone find an apartment, land a job and otherwise build a life.
Living in one of Romania’s notorious orphanages, he was given virtually no guidance about how to survive when it came time to leave.
“They don’t prepare you for life,” says Ciobotaru, who was 26 when he was first sent out on his own. Now 34, his thinning, graying hair and slight frame make him appear much older than his years.
“That’s the problem for 2,000 young people who leave every year,” he adds. “They aren’t able to maintain a job, they don’t know how to cook… so they can’t create a family.”
More than two decades after the fall of communism exposed shocking conditions for the country’s abandoned children living in state institutions, life for many has improved. But the state still provides no formalized life-training program or ongoing support for the estimated 70,000 children who fall under the care of the Department of Child Protection, let alone the tens of thousands more believed to live on the streets.
More from GlobalPost: Romanian orphans, Part 1
Laurentiu Ierusalim grew up in an orphanage after he was abandoned in a hospital at birth. Now 26, he says he was told he’d be discharged only the day before he had to leave.
“I spent the entire first day standing in front of the orphanage,” he says. “I didn’t know what to do, so I slept in a playground across the street.”
Ierusalim stayed homeless. Bundled in a warm sweatshirt, his dark eyes cast downward, he describes spending three years moving from city to city, knocking on doors to ask for work, food and shelter.
A priest at an Orthodox church helped find families to take him in — three months here, a month there. He finally secured a job as a grocery store clerk two months ago.
The authorities say they’re addressing the problem he faced. Christina Cuculas of the Labor, Family and Social Protection Ministry says social workers, educators and other specialists spend years teaching orphans fundamental skills.
“They help them with what we call ‘gathering independent life skills’ from the moment [orphans] enter the special protection system,” she says.
But many say “life training” and other help for integrating into society greatly varies if it’s available at all.
Most discharged orphans are thrust into society provided with less than $140 as soon as they legally become adults at age 18. There are no national job or housing assistance programs.
Although Cuculas says companies contact her ministry to request workers whose skills fit their needs, many orphans who turn down a first offer say they get no further help from the state.
Many, like Ierusalim, face the terrible hazards of living alone on the streets. “I was traveling with a group that was into drugs, but I left them,” he says. “I slept in random places on the street… I prayed to God for help. I never gave up.”
A lucky few who are able to attend college are allowed to continue living in institutions until age 26.
But only a small handful earn the top marks on their entrance exams that enable Romanians to attend university free.
Among them, Ciobotaru was orphaned at age 10 when his mother died during childbirth. His father, a pilot, had died in a plane crash when Ciobotaru was an infant.
Without his parents, he relied on his own initiative and a bond with an American family he’d never met.
During his teens, Carolyn and Bruce Coughlin of Massachusetts began sponsoring him through the Boston-based charity Romanian Children’s Relief.
Ciobotaru says Carolyn’s encouragement and interest made a great difference. “I knew someone was thinking about me,” he says. “She was like an angel, very glad for every achievement I had. She used to tell me I was an amazing child.”
The Coughlins became close to Ciobotaru through monthly letters. They first met after 15 years of correspondence when he organized a choir trip to the United States for a children’s singing group in 2010.
“They’re my family,” he says. “Every child in this world can have a family no matter the distance.”
He says he was lucky to have been orphaned in Bucharest because more private aid is available in the capital than in the countryside, together with occasional temporary jobs and short-term housing.
But Ciobotaru was never your average orphan. He says he found ways to cope from the start, including minimizing frequent bullying by helping others.
“Ironing clothes for the younger kids, for example, and helping in the kitchen,” he says. “The adults in charge began trusting me. That protected me.”
Ciobotaru managed to pick up some household skills and win the attention of the orphanage director and other key figures.
As a teenager, he came up with plans to raise money for children to hold monthly birthday celebrations, attend camps and go on fieldtrips.
Later, he expanded his mission to help others by applying for a social work degree at a Bucharest university after earning the highest possible score on an entrance exam.
After he won a contest to speak at a conference in Norway, he funded his flight there through UNICEF. He was later recruited to speak at a similar program in India.
More from GlobalPost: Russia: Tens of thousands protest US adoption ban
He now works with at-risk youth for the Department of Child Protection.
In 2011, Ciobotaru founded Sansa Ta, “Your Chance,” a foundation that raises money for the homeless and collects donations for needy children.
It also plans to build an apartment building for orphans entering society.
Twelve have already been selected to help with construction on land promised by the government in Bufeta, just outside Bucharest. Their labor will serve as security deposits and initial rent payments on studio apartments.
“I was different than other kids because I liked to get involved,” he says of his childhood. “But like other orphans, I knew I’d have to go out into a new world where life isn’t easy.”

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...