Wednesday, 7 October 2009
delicious foods
http://www.richimag.co.uk/food/ Redwood, we specialise in producing delicious foods that are totally free from animal ingredients. From tasty, kinder alternatives to meat and fish to dairy-free ‘cheeses', we're passionate about creating the very best in natural plant-based foods. Foods that help protect not just animals but also people and the environment. Foods that are free too from hydrogenated fats, eggs, GMOs, cholesterol, artificial colours and preservatives.
What makes our foods special? The fact that they're just that little bit different. From fish-style fingers, smoked salmon pate and spicy falafel to meat-free ‘bacon', nuggets and Schnitzels, Redwood foods are inspirational, healthy and nutritious and a great source of protein. We've even picked up a few awards along the way. And been awarded ethical company status.
So whether you're vegetarian or vegan, have special dietary needs, don't eat meat for religious reasons or simply want to eat more healthily, take a look at what Redwood has in store. You'll find our Vegideli , Cheezly and Cheatin' ranges in good health food stores nationwide including Holland and Barrett, selected supermarkets or from our online shop
proves that vegetable alternatives for milk and meat can be just as tasty and versatile
proves that vegetable alternatives for milk and meat can be just as tasty and versatile. Because all the organic ingredients in the Provamel products come from organic farming, they taste pure and fresh. They can be used in many dishes (e.g. added to breakfast cereals, in sauces, cakes, pancakes, but also in coffee or tea, etc.). Just try it, you won't be disappointed.
Furthermore, since Provamel is 100% vegetable, it naturally contains no cholesterol. Soy beans are also rich in proteins, fibres and vitamins. With their unique composition and properties, soy based products are suitable for:
a healthy balanced and varied diet
a vegetarian/vegan diet (*)
a lactose free diet (**)
a cow’s milk protein free diet.
a cholesterol free/low diet
a gluten free diet
* all Provamel products are 100% free of animal ingredients
** with the exception of Provamel Bio Muesli Crunchy Choco
The Prostate Care Cookbook
is probably the most delicious cancer treatment yet devised. A recipe book built around foods known to help to fight prostate cancer is the first example of “evidence-based cooking”, its author said yesterday.
The Prostate Care Cookbook has been written by scientists for people with prostate cancer or at risk of developing it.
“There is growing scientific evidence that strongly suggests that diets rich in certain foods can help prevent this disease or its spread,” the authors write. “For those living with the condition, a controlled diet may be the only means of active treatment.”
Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer in men, but aggressive treatments can often be worse than the disease, said Margaret Rayman, Professor of Nutritional Medicine at the University of Surrey and lead author of the book.
Related Links
Mineral in British crops could boost health
Vitamin tablets ‘largely a waste of money'
‘Songbirds threatened by organic farming’
“It’s often quite indolent and slow-growing. So there may be something you can do with diet.” Foods such as onions and garlic, broccoli and cauliflower, fish and tomatoes, have all been shown to lower the risk of developing the cancer, or slowing its spread.
But Professor Rayman said: “It’s not just what you eat but how you cook it.” When garlic or onions are chopped, they produce an enzyme, alliinase, that produces anti-cancer compounds. But these are destroyed if they are heated immediately.
“The secret is you’ve got to leave the vegetables to stand for ten minutes before cooking to allow the alliinase to do its work,” Professor Rayman told the British Science Festival.
Cruciferous vegetables, which include broccoli, cabbage, rocket and radish, also need to be chopped but not overcooked. “Cook them lightly, steam them or eat them raw,” Professor Rayman advised.
Tomatoes are also best chopped or processed, and she said “a sauce made from a tin of plum tomatoes would be ideal”.
Chefs including Raymond Blanc and Antony Worrall Thompson have contributed recipes to the cookbook, which has been produced in association with the charity Prostate Cancer Research Foundation.
Professor Rayman said that her aim was to offer “food that everyone in the family can eat, not something precious”.
The recipes also aim to avoid foods that may worsen risks for prostate cancer, including dairy products, processed or overcooked meats and saturated fats.
There is no need to cut out milk in your tea, Professor Rayman say, but “you shouldn’t be pigging out on milk or yoghurt”.
Every year 35,000 men in Britain have prostate cancer diagnosed, and the condition accounts for 22 per cent of all cancers. However it is responsible for only 12 per cent of cancer deaths in men, and in older patients doctors often recommend “watchful waiting” rather than radical surgery, which can have serious side-effects including erectile dysfunction.
Managing such patients’ diet more effectively will allow them to take control of their treatment, Professor Rayman said.
“There’s also a psychological benefit to doing something about your own condition,” she added.
Roasted tomato and sweet potato soup (Serves 4) 450g sweet potatoes, peeled and sliced 1.2kg tomatoes, halved Two tablespoons olive oil One large onion, chopped into wedges Two garlic cloves, sliced Salt and pepper One small bunch of basil leaves, torn, plus extra to garnish One tablespoon of tomato puree
1 Preheat the oven to 200C/400F/gas 6
2 Parboil the sweet potatoes in a saucepan for five minutes, drain and leave to cool
3 Place all the ingredients except the tomato puree on a roasting tray and drizzle with the oil
4 Roast in the oven for 30 minutes, turning the vegetables halfway through
5 Once removed from the oven, pick any burnt skins off the tomatoes, which will come away easily
6 Whizz all the ingredients, along with 600ml water and the tomato puree, in a blender or processor
7 Reheat to serve and garnish with basil leaves
The Prostate Care Cookbook has been written by scientists for people with prostate cancer or at risk of developing it.
“There is growing scientific evidence that strongly suggests that diets rich in certain foods can help prevent this disease or its spread,” the authors write. “For those living with the condition, a controlled diet may be the only means of active treatment.”
Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer in men, but aggressive treatments can often be worse than the disease, said Margaret Rayman, Professor of Nutritional Medicine at the University of Surrey and lead author of the book.
Related Links
Mineral in British crops could boost health
Vitamin tablets ‘largely a waste of money'
‘Songbirds threatened by organic farming’
“It’s often quite indolent and slow-growing. So there may be something you can do with diet.” Foods such as onions and garlic, broccoli and cauliflower, fish and tomatoes, have all been shown to lower the risk of developing the cancer, or slowing its spread.
But Professor Rayman said: “It’s not just what you eat but how you cook it.” When garlic or onions are chopped, they produce an enzyme, alliinase, that produces anti-cancer compounds. But these are destroyed if they are heated immediately.
“The secret is you’ve got to leave the vegetables to stand for ten minutes before cooking to allow the alliinase to do its work,” Professor Rayman told the British Science Festival.
Cruciferous vegetables, which include broccoli, cabbage, rocket and radish, also need to be chopped but not overcooked. “Cook them lightly, steam them or eat them raw,” Professor Rayman advised.
Tomatoes are also best chopped or processed, and she said “a sauce made from a tin of plum tomatoes would be ideal”.
Chefs including Raymond Blanc and Antony Worrall Thompson have contributed recipes to the cookbook, which has been produced in association with the charity Prostate Cancer Research Foundation.
Professor Rayman said that her aim was to offer “food that everyone in the family can eat, not something precious”.
The recipes also aim to avoid foods that may worsen risks for prostate cancer, including dairy products, processed or overcooked meats and saturated fats.
There is no need to cut out milk in your tea, Professor Rayman say, but “you shouldn’t be pigging out on milk or yoghurt”.
Every year 35,000 men in Britain have prostate cancer diagnosed, and the condition accounts for 22 per cent of all cancers. However it is responsible for only 12 per cent of cancer deaths in men, and in older patients doctors often recommend “watchful waiting” rather than radical surgery, which can have serious side-effects including erectile dysfunction.
Managing such patients’ diet more effectively will allow them to take control of their treatment, Professor Rayman said.
“There’s also a psychological benefit to doing something about your own condition,” she added.
Roasted tomato and sweet potato soup (Serves 4) 450g sweet potatoes, peeled and sliced 1.2kg tomatoes, halved Two tablespoons olive oil One large onion, chopped into wedges Two garlic cloves, sliced Salt and pepper One small bunch of basil leaves, torn, plus extra to garnish One tablespoon of tomato puree
1 Preheat the oven to 200C/400F/gas 6
2 Parboil the sweet potatoes in a saucepan for five minutes, drain and leave to cool
3 Place all the ingredients except the tomato puree on a roasting tray and drizzle with the oil
4 Roast in the oven for 30 minutes, turning the vegetables halfway through
5 Once removed from the oven, pick any burnt skins off the tomatoes, which will come away easily
6 Whizz all the ingredients, along with 600ml water and the tomato puree, in a blender or processor
7 Reheat to serve and garnish with basil leaves
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
Lethal food bug found in two-thirds of chickens
Lethal food bug found in two-thirds of chickens
(Ben Gurr/The Times)
Most cases of campylobacter are caused by consumption of undercooked chicken or cross-contamination
A food poisoning bug that kills an estimated 80 people a year in Britain is found in two thirds of all chickens on sale in the country.
A survey for the Food Standards Agency (FSA) found that contamination in “home-produced” chickens was even higher, with 76 per cent of all samples of whole birds and chicken portions, including those farmed to free-range and organic standards, infected by campylobacter.
About 460,000 people a year suffer diarrhoea, cramps and abdominal pain caused by the bacteria, which can also be picked up from untreated water, unpasteurised milk and red meat. In the very young, the elderly and those suffering underlying medical conditions, campylobacter can be fatal.
However, about 337,000 of the annual sickness cases are linked to eating undercooked chicken or handling fresh poultry meat and cross-contaminating other foods or work surfaces in household and professional kitchens.
Related Links
Elderly gambling with ‘use by’ dates
Investigation reveals deadly kebab contents
Sewage-infested oysters poisoned Fat Duck diners
Andrew Wadge, chief scientist at the FSA, said the figures reinforced the need for the highest possible hygiene standards in the home and in professional kitchens.
The bug can be destroyed by thorough cooking and, so consumers should eat the meat only when the juices run clear. Anyone handling chicken should also wash their hands and clean knives and work surfaces to prevent contamination of other foods.
Dr Wadge said: “Campylobacter is not just a risk from eating undercooked chicken, it’s about cross-contamination and getting campylobacter on your hands and transferring it to salads and fresh vegetables.”
The bacteria has been present in the environment and in poultry for years and is not caused by modern farming practices.
He suggested that the ideal solution was to find a vaccine for chickens.
A more immediate remedy would be to press the European Commission to allow fresh poultry to be soaked in a chlorinated wash in abattoirs before being distributed for sale to retailers.
Such a wash is used elsewhere in the world and is harmless to human, but is banned in the European Union.
In New Zealand, where the wash has been introduced in chicken production, the number of people suffering food poisoning from campylobacter has halved.
vegan
I didn't become vegan to be healthy , it was a mental thing , I decided to not
use animals for my benefit , I grew as a meat eater , about the age of 30
I met a veggie woman and we ate together and at the time I enjoyed cooking .
I was working as a K.p in a carvery in eastbourne england ,at the time I needed work I was
broke and needed work and food it did the job and an interesting story is attached,
I grew up in a fertile country which was fertile and able to have a good amount of food ,
1953 was 8 years after the second world war, the was fresh .
use animals for my benefit , I grew as a meat eater , about the age of 30
I met a veggie woman and we ate together and at the time I enjoyed cooking .
I was working as a K.p in a carvery in eastbourne england ,at the time I needed work I was
broke and needed work and food it did the job and an interesting story is attached,
I grew up in a fertile country which was fertile and able to have a good amount of food ,
1953 was 8 years after the second world war, the was fresh .
fatty acids
Benefits of Essential Fatty Acids
Essential Fatty Acids are a key issue right now - and mainly because we are generally deficient in them. These fats are considered necessary for human health and must be available from food sources as the body cannot manufacture them itself. EFA's are also known as Omega 3 and Omega 6 and are available from seeds, nuts and oily fish.
Although there are arguments for the use of fish oils as a source of EFA's, there are also concerns about the high level of toxicity in fish oils. A preferable source therefore maybe organic seeds and nuts.
However, a balance between omega 3 and omega 6 intake is also very important, as too much omega 6 can have detrimental effects. EFA guru Udo Erasmus considers hemp seed to have the ideal ratio of Omega 3 and 6 for sustainable human health.
EFA's benefit the body in many ways but two stand out - the effect on the cells and on the brain. EFA's help repair cell damage as they are part of the cell membrane, and they also help keep the cells fluid - important in maintaining the correct function of the skin, whilst also improving the energy flow between cells, as well as the nutrient absorption and detox function. In short, healthy glowing skin! EFA's are readily absorbed into the skin when applied direct.
Meanwhile, our brains are 60% fat! And over 1/3rd are EFA's. Therefore the quality of fats is imperative for proper brain function. And a lack of EFA's has been associated with learning difficulties and behavioural problems with children
Essential Fatty Acids are a key issue right now - and mainly because we are generally deficient in them. These fats are considered necessary for human health and must be available from food sources as the body cannot manufacture them itself. EFA's are also known as Omega 3 and Omega 6 and are available from seeds, nuts and oily fish.
Although there are arguments for the use of fish oils as a source of EFA's, there are also concerns about the high level of toxicity in fish oils. A preferable source therefore maybe organic seeds and nuts.
However, a balance between omega 3 and omega 6 intake is also very important, as too much omega 6 can have detrimental effects. EFA guru Udo Erasmus considers hemp seed to have the ideal ratio of Omega 3 and 6 for sustainable human health.
EFA's benefit the body in many ways but two stand out - the effect on the cells and on the brain. EFA's help repair cell damage as they are part of the cell membrane, and they also help keep the cells fluid - important in maintaining the correct function of the skin, whilst also improving the energy flow between cells, as well as the nutrient absorption and detox function. In short, healthy glowing skin! EFA's are readily absorbed into the skin when applied direct.
Meanwhile, our brains are 60% fat! And over 1/3rd are EFA's. Therefore the quality of fats is imperative for proper brain function. And a lack of EFA's has been associated with learning difficulties and behavioural problems with children
Age Concern is also calling for
Health
Elderly care 'needs radical overhaul'
Elderly people should not pay for health and social care, says Age Concern
Radio 5Live on Age Concern's report
Britain's growing elderly population need a cheaper, more equal and more open system of long-term care, according to charity Age Concern.
In its final submission to the Royal Commission on Long Term Care, Age Concern calls for a radical overhaul of the existing system, including:
new locally based community care authorities to administer long-term care
a state-funded scheme which allows the young to save for possible future care costs
free health and social services care for all elderly people.
Sally Greengross, Age Concern England's director general, said: "If the services of the future are to support the growing older population, the Royal Commission must look closely at the experience of the past and resist the temptation to patch up and paper over the cracks in the current system."
Sally Greengross: long-term care needs a total overhaul
Although the Royal Commission, set up last December, is supposed to look at funding for long-term care, Age Concern says it should first define what the term covers.
It wants a new national definition of long-term care which clearly distinguishes between the cost of the nursing element of care homes and other 'hotel' costs, such as food, accommodation and cleaning.
This would ensure elderly people did not have to fund health costs and would make for smaller nursing home bills.
The charity says many elderly people in nursing homes now pay for health care which should be free on the NHS.
Age Concern also wants a national system for subsidising hotel charges.
Community care authorities
The charity is also proposing that new locally based community care authorities be set up.
Some old people fall between the health and social services nets
Currently, long-term care costs are split between health and social services departments.
Age Concern says this can be confusing for elderly people and can cause funding battles between departments, leading to delays in people getting the care they need.
For example, bathing services for the elderly can be defined as either a medical or a social need.
The government is due to set out its recipe for reducing the so-called "Berlin Wall" between health and social services on Wednesday.
National guidelines
Age Concern is also proposing national guidelines on charges for long-term care.
"There is quite a lot of disparity across the country. What you get access to and whether you pay for it depends on where you live," said a spokeswoman.
"Elderly people need to know what is available, what they can expect, what kind of financial support they can have and how much they will have to contribute," she added.
Age Concern is also calling for:
ring-fenced funding for long-term care
a system which takes into account every aspect of a person's ability to pay for long-term care
an annual independent review of care standards and costs
a review of benefits for the elderly, particularly those who are disabled
government to meet any shortfall between local and health authorities' resources and elderly people's needs.
Age Concern gives oral evidence to the Royal Commission on 24 September.
It has so far submitted nine papers to the commission, which is due to report its findings in December.
Elderly care 'needs radical overhaul'
Elderly people should not pay for health and social care, says Age Concern
Radio 5Live on Age Concern's report
Britain's growing elderly population need a cheaper, more equal and more open system of long-term care, according to charity Age Concern.
In its final submission to the Royal Commission on Long Term Care, Age Concern calls for a radical overhaul of the existing system, including:
new locally based community care authorities to administer long-term care
a state-funded scheme which allows the young to save for possible future care costs
free health and social services care for all elderly people.
Sally Greengross, Age Concern England's director general, said: "If the services of the future are to support the growing older population, the Royal Commission must look closely at the experience of the past and resist the temptation to patch up and paper over the cracks in the current system."
Sally Greengross: long-term care needs a total overhaul
Although the Royal Commission, set up last December, is supposed to look at funding for long-term care, Age Concern says it should first define what the term covers.
It wants a new national definition of long-term care which clearly distinguishes between the cost of the nursing element of care homes and other 'hotel' costs, such as food, accommodation and cleaning.
This would ensure elderly people did not have to fund health costs and would make for smaller nursing home bills.
The charity says many elderly people in nursing homes now pay for health care which should be free on the NHS.
Age Concern also wants a national system for subsidising hotel charges.
Community care authorities
The charity is also proposing that new locally based community care authorities be set up.
Some old people fall between the health and social services nets
Currently, long-term care costs are split between health and social services departments.
Age Concern says this can be confusing for elderly people and can cause funding battles between departments, leading to delays in people getting the care they need.
For example, bathing services for the elderly can be defined as either a medical or a social need.
The government is due to set out its recipe for reducing the so-called "Berlin Wall" between health and social services on Wednesday.
National guidelines
Age Concern is also proposing national guidelines on charges for long-term care.
"There is quite a lot of disparity across the country. What you get access to and whether you pay for it depends on where you live," said a spokeswoman.
"Elderly people need to know what is available, what they can expect, what kind of financial support they can have and how much they will have to contribute," she added.
Age Concern is also calling for:
ring-fenced funding for long-term care
a system which takes into account every aspect of a person's ability to pay for long-term care
an annual independent review of care standards and costs
a review of benefits for the elderly, particularly those who are disabled
government to meet any shortfall between local and health authorities' resources and elderly people's needs.
Age Concern gives oral evidence to the Royal Commission on 24 September.
It has so far submitted nine papers to the commission, which is due to report its findings in December.
The politics of long-term care
UK Politics
The politics of long-term care
The report's plans could cost the state £800m
The government has yet to respond to the main recommendations of a major study into caring for the elderly.
Four months after the Royal Commission on Long-Term Care for the Elderly called for free nursing and personal care to be available for all, there is still silence from ministers.
The commission was set up by the government to look into the complex issue of who funds long-term care.
The motivation was concerns over Britain's ageing population.
Currently, the ratio of people of working age to people over 65 is 3.7 to one.
In the next 40 years that is likely to fall to two to one, meaning there is less tax money around for the government to fund long-term care.
Recommendations
The commission's key recommendations include:
That the costs of care for those individuals who need it should be split between living costs, housing costs and personal care
That personal care should be free and funded by general taxation
That elderly people should pay for housing and accommodation costs, but that payment should be subject to a means test
That the government should establish a National Care Commission to monitor trends in the nursing and residential care market, demography and spending, to represent elderly people, to encourage innovation, to ensure transparency and accountability in the system and to set national benchmarks for long-term care.
The commission also recommended that the value of a person's home should be disregarded for up to three months after admission to residential care.
It stated that quality of care needed to be improved so that it was more client-centred and that budgets should be shared between health, social services and other statutory bodies, but accessed by clients through a single point of contact.
The commission also made recommendations relating to carers and called for a national carer support package.
Selling homes
Under the current system, people who are in care homes run by the NHS are exempt from charges for nursing care, while those in other types of homes often have to contribute towards their care costs, based on means-testing.
The growing elderly population will need long-term care
People with between £10,000 and £16,000 in savings get some help from the state to pay for their care.
Those with under £10,000 get the maximum state support, but are still expected to use their savings to pay towards some of their care.
The commission recommends that level should be raised to £60,000.
Many elderly people have been forced to sell their homes to pay for long-term care.
Nursing organisations and charities campaigning for the elderly have long oppposed what they say is an arbitrary division between nursing and personal care.
The cost of funding the commission's proposals over funding personal care is thought to be about £220m a year.
Unveiling the commission's report in the House of Commons in March, Health Secretary Frank Dobson said the government would respond after an informed debate, but no formal response has yet been issued.
The Commons health select committee has criticised the government for its lack of response.
On Thursday, the government responded to the select committee's report on long-term care, saying it backed many of its findings.
However, it was once again silent over the committee's comments on the Long-Term Care Commission.
Charities have also been critical of the delay.
They have welcomed the commission's proposals, but some organisations are disappointed that it did not endorse concerns about a "demographic timebomb".
The politics of long-term care
The report's plans could cost the state £800m
The government has yet to respond to the main recommendations of a major study into caring for the elderly.
Four months after the Royal Commission on Long-Term Care for the Elderly called for free nursing and personal care to be available for all, there is still silence from ministers.
The commission was set up by the government to look into the complex issue of who funds long-term care.
The motivation was concerns over Britain's ageing population.
Currently, the ratio of people of working age to people over 65 is 3.7 to one.
In the next 40 years that is likely to fall to two to one, meaning there is less tax money around for the government to fund long-term care.
Recommendations
The commission's key recommendations include:
That the costs of care for those individuals who need it should be split between living costs, housing costs and personal care
That personal care should be free and funded by general taxation
That elderly people should pay for housing and accommodation costs, but that payment should be subject to a means test
That the government should establish a National Care Commission to monitor trends in the nursing and residential care market, demography and spending, to represent elderly people, to encourage innovation, to ensure transparency and accountability in the system and to set national benchmarks for long-term care.
The commission also recommended that the value of a person's home should be disregarded for up to three months after admission to residential care.
It stated that quality of care needed to be improved so that it was more client-centred and that budgets should be shared between health, social services and other statutory bodies, but accessed by clients through a single point of contact.
The commission also made recommendations relating to carers and called for a national carer support package.
Selling homes
Under the current system, people who are in care homes run by the NHS are exempt from charges for nursing care, while those in other types of homes often have to contribute towards their care costs, based on means-testing.
The growing elderly population will need long-term care
People with between £10,000 and £16,000 in savings get some help from the state to pay for their care.
Those with under £10,000 get the maximum state support, but are still expected to use their savings to pay towards some of their care.
The commission recommends that level should be raised to £60,000.
Many elderly people have been forced to sell their homes to pay for long-term care.
Nursing organisations and charities campaigning for the elderly have long oppposed what they say is an arbitrary division between nursing and personal care.
The cost of funding the commission's proposals over funding personal care is thought to be about £220m a year.
Unveiling the commission's report in the House of Commons in March, Health Secretary Frank Dobson said the government would respond after an informed debate, but no formal response has yet been issued.
The Commons health select committee has criticised the government for its lack of response.
On Thursday, the government responded to the select committee's report on long-term care, saying it backed many of its findings.
However, it was once again silent over the committee's comments on the Long-Term Care Commission.
Charities have also been critical of the delay.
They have welcomed the commission's proposals, but some organisations are disappointed that it did not endorse concerns about a "demographic timebomb".
Paul Burstow elderly person
5 http://www.richimag.co.uk/hrioa/ elderly person living in a care home is likely to receive four times as many prescription items as a person living in their own home. As many as 1 in 5 admissions to hospital are linked to inappropriate drug therapy.
2.6 Particularly at risk are elderly people with dementia. Behaviour such as wandering, poor self-care, restlessness, impaired memory, depression without psychosis, uncooperativeness and agitation that is not dangerous, are common features of the disease. There are no medical reasons for prescribing antipsychotics in such cases. Managing challenging behaviour without trained staff is no excuse for reliance on chemical solutions. Until more trained staff are in post, there will continue to be calls for even more use of antipsychotic medication, to the detriment of the patients well-being.
2.7 In December 2001, following direction by the Labour Government, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence were set to issue guidance concerning the cost and clinical effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic medication for people with schizophrenia. This guidance has now been postponed until March 2002.1 Older people that do not suffer from schizophrenia have been left out. The National Service Framework for Older People and the National Minimum Standards published in March 2001 are steps in the right direction. But they will fail to deliver change for older people unless there is rigorous monitoring and enforcement, yet there are scant resources to do this. Furthermore, international evidence suggests annual reviews of prescribing to older people are inadequate, and that harm can be done to an older person in far less time than a year.
2.8 Successive studies have demonstrated the need for a step-change in the way medication is used in the care of the elderly. The chemical management of older people is a scandal. It denies older people their dignity, and robs them of a better quality of life. Pressure on care providers is not an excuse for inappropriate use of medication. GPs and care home managers should be jointly accountable for safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable elderly people in their care.
Recommendations
2.9 The Department of Health must commission urgent quantitative and qualitative research into the extent and reasons for the overuse of antipsychotic medication in different care settings.
2.10 The National Institute for Clinical Excellence must prepare and publish guidance on the use of antipsychotic drugs and non-drug alternatives in the care of older people. This would include the development of a model for drug list revisions in care homes, to automatically evaluate drug lists according to a quality indicator, and keep track of the drug lists and changes made to that list. The quality indicator should also serve as guidelines for prescribers.
2.11 Review the National Service Framework and National Minimum Standards for care homes to ensure that the standard on medication, (standard 9), provides for prescribing reviews at least every three months. All prescribing decisions must be clearly documented with the reasons for the use of the medication set out in full. By evaluating the Scottish
2.6 Particularly at risk are elderly people with dementia. Behaviour such as wandering, poor self-care, restlessness, impaired memory, depression without psychosis, uncooperativeness and agitation that is not dangerous, are common features of the disease. There are no medical reasons for prescribing antipsychotics in such cases. Managing challenging behaviour without trained staff is no excuse for reliance on chemical solutions. Until more trained staff are in post, there will continue to be calls for even more use of antipsychotic medication, to the detriment of the patients well-being.
2.7 In December 2001, following direction by the Labour Government, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence were set to issue guidance concerning the cost and clinical effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic medication for people with schizophrenia. This guidance has now been postponed until March 2002.1 Older people that do not suffer from schizophrenia have been left out. The National Service Framework for Older People and the National Minimum Standards published in March 2001 are steps in the right direction. But they will fail to deliver change for older people unless there is rigorous monitoring and enforcement, yet there are scant resources to do this. Furthermore, international evidence suggests annual reviews of prescribing to older people are inadequate, and that harm can be done to an older person in far less time than a year.
2.8 Successive studies have demonstrated the need for a step-change in the way medication is used in the care of the elderly. The chemical management of older people is a scandal. It denies older people their dignity, and robs them of a better quality of life. Pressure on care providers is not an excuse for inappropriate use of medication. GPs and care home managers should be jointly accountable for safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable elderly people in their care.
Recommendations
2.9 The Department of Health must commission urgent quantitative and qualitative research into the extent and reasons for the overuse of antipsychotic medication in different care settings.
2.10 The National Institute for Clinical Excellence must prepare and publish guidance on the use of antipsychotic drugs and non-drug alternatives in the care of older people. This would include the development of a model for drug list revisions in care homes, to automatically evaluate drug lists according to a quality indicator, and keep track of the drug lists and changes made to that list. The quality indicator should also serve as guidelines for prescribers.
2.11 Review the National Service Framework and National Minimum Standards for care homes to ensure that the standard on medication, (standard 9), provides for prescribing reviews at least every three months. All prescribing decisions must be clearly documented with the reasons for the use of the medication set out in full. By evaluating the Scottish
Long Term Carers
Flexible Working Practices for Long Term Carers
Speech by Paul Burstow MP delivered to Speech to the Sutton & Merton PCT Carers and Employment Conference, The Holiday Inn, Sutton on Thu 15th Jun 2006
Every minute of every day four new carers start caring.
It could happen to any one of us, overnight. Three in five of us will become carers at some point in our lives. For many caring responsibilities will come during their working lives. And that's the challenge.
Taking on caring responsibilities should not force the carer to give up work. Doing so can set in motion a chain of events that ends up with the carer suffering from poorer health and poorer wealth.
The research evidence is compelling: caring can have a serious effect on both the psychological and physiological health.
For many carers of working age the consequences of giving up work can be huge. Quite apart from the compelling social reasons for more flexible employment practices there is also a powerful economic case.
Our economy is estimated to need a further 2.5 million people in the workforce over the next eight years. Currently there are 3 million carers in employment, but there are 4 million of working age.
One in five people have given up work to care. Once a carer has given up work it is harder to get back into work. The longer they are out of the workforce the less likely they are ever to return and more likely to be dependent on income support.
That is why I co-sponsored and helped to pilot onto the statute book the Carers (Equal Opportunities) Act 2004 and before that the Carers and Disabled Children Act.
The Carer Act 2004 extended the rights of carers pacing new duties on local authorities to take account of carer's wishes to work or undertake training when undertaking a carers assessment. But that is only part of the picture. Flexible working practices are essential to retain carers in the workforce.
Flexible because one size does not fit all, carers need different levels of support at different times. Any thing from access to a phone to check on a person, to leaving and start times that fit around hospital appointments.
Without this flexibility the pressure and stress on the carers can become unbearable, making them ill, driving them from the workplace.
A loss to the business in terms of knowledge, experience and training.
A loss to the economy in taxes, extra benefit payments.
Research suggests that employers who introduce more flexible working benefit. For example, a 26 per cent reduction in stress related absences.
So we have the Carers (Equal Opportunities) Act promoting a positive duty on local Councils facilitating carers working. But what about employers? Currently before Parliament is another Bill shortly to become an Act, the Work and Families Bill.
Clause 12 of the Bill extends the right to request flexible working beyond the Employment Relations Act 1999. It does not mandate employers to concede this but it does require proper consideration.
Clause 12 amends the Employment Rights Act and provides a power to make regulations. The question is what the regulations will say and in particular how carers are defined. The Government has consulted on two definitions. First, is a narrow definition restricting the provisions of the Act to 'close relatives' such as husbands, wives, someone living with you, father, mother, son, daughter - including in laws. Second is a 'near relative' definition which includes everyone in the first definition but adds grandparents, brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles.
I think good relation must be simple to implement - that means it should be easily understood. It makes sense to use an established definition of carers. To opt for a narrower 'close relative' definition would draw an arbitrary distinction that would lead to confusion and resentment in the workplace. Why should someone caring for their grandparents or a brother or a sister be treated differently?
I hope that the Government responds positively to the consultation and gets the definition right.
This new right comes into effect from April 2007. There is already plenty of good practice out these: flexible starting and finishing times; compressed working hours; annualised working hours; job sharing or part-time working; homeworking; term-time working.
To conclude we all owe a huge debt to carers; their contribution as carers has been estimated at £57 billion a year. Without them our health and social services would be unable to cope. But words are not enough. Providing carers with the opportunity to work makes good business sense. I hope today's conference proves a useful catalyst to encourage employers and carers alike
Speech by Paul Burstow MP delivered to Speech to the Sutton & Merton PCT Carers and Employment Conference, The Holiday Inn, Sutton on Thu 15th Jun 2006
Every minute of every day four new carers start caring.
It could happen to any one of us, overnight. Three in five of us will become carers at some point in our lives. For many caring responsibilities will come during their working lives. And that's the challenge.
Taking on caring responsibilities should not force the carer to give up work. Doing so can set in motion a chain of events that ends up with the carer suffering from poorer health and poorer wealth.
The research evidence is compelling: caring can have a serious effect on both the psychological and physiological health.
For many carers of working age the consequences of giving up work can be huge. Quite apart from the compelling social reasons for more flexible employment practices there is also a powerful economic case.
Our economy is estimated to need a further 2.5 million people in the workforce over the next eight years. Currently there are 3 million carers in employment, but there are 4 million of working age.
One in five people have given up work to care. Once a carer has given up work it is harder to get back into work. The longer they are out of the workforce the less likely they are ever to return and more likely to be dependent on income support.
That is why I co-sponsored and helped to pilot onto the statute book the Carers (Equal Opportunities) Act 2004 and before that the Carers and Disabled Children Act.
The Carer Act 2004 extended the rights of carers pacing new duties on local authorities to take account of carer's wishes to work or undertake training when undertaking a carers assessment. But that is only part of the picture. Flexible working practices are essential to retain carers in the workforce.
Flexible because one size does not fit all, carers need different levels of support at different times. Any thing from access to a phone to check on a person, to leaving and start times that fit around hospital appointments.
Without this flexibility the pressure and stress on the carers can become unbearable, making them ill, driving them from the workplace.
A loss to the business in terms of knowledge, experience and training.
A loss to the economy in taxes, extra benefit payments.
Research suggests that employers who introduce more flexible working benefit. For example, a 26 per cent reduction in stress related absences.
So we have the Carers (Equal Opportunities) Act promoting a positive duty on local Councils facilitating carers working. But what about employers? Currently before Parliament is another Bill shortly to become an Act, the Work and Families Bill.
Clause 12 of the Bill extends the right to request flexible working beyond the Employment Relations Act 1999. It does not mandate employers to concede this but it does require proper consideration.
Clause 12 amends the Employment Rights Act and provides a power to make regulations. The question is what the regulations will say and in particular how carers are defined. The Government has consulted on two definitions. First, is a narrow definition restricting the provisions of the Act to 'close relatives' such as husbands, wives, someone living with you, father, mother, son, daughter - including in laws. Second is a 'near relative' definition which includes everyone in the first definition but adds grandparents, brothers, sisters, aunts and uncles.
I think good relation must be simple to implement - that means it should be easily understood. It makes sense to use an established definition of carers. To opt for a narrower 'close relative' definition would draw an arbitrary distinction that would lead to confusion and resentment in the workplace. Why should someone caring for their grandparents or a brother or a sister be treated differently?
I hope that the Government responds positively to the consultation and gets the definition right.
This new right comes into effect from April 2007. There is already plenty of good practice out these: flexible starting and finishing times; compressed working hours; annualised working hours; job sharing or part-time working; homeworking; term-time working.
To conclude we all owe a huge debt to carers; their contribution as carers has been estimated at £57 billion a year. Without them our health and social services would be unable to cope. But words are not enough. Providing carers with the opportunity to work makes good business sense. I hope today's conference proves a useful catalyst to encourage employers and carers alike
Human rights law 'fails elderly'
Human rights law 'fails elderly'
Elderly people need better protection, the charity said
Human rights legislation is failing some vulnerable older people, according to charity Help the Aged.
The charity said gaps in the law left older people exposed to mistreatment which cannot be fully investigated or dealt with under the Human Rights Act.
It said that while statutory services were covered under the Act, the majority of care - which is contracted to the private sector - is not.
It urged the government to push forward with its planned equality bill.
The bill, included in the 2005 Queen's Speech, will establish a Commission for Equality and Human Rights, among other aims.
Champion needed
Help the Aged said such a body would have powers to champion older people's rights and could better protect them from abuse and neglect from carers.
The charity said the majority of older people's services - including more than 90% of care home places and nearly 70% of domiciliary care hours - are contracted out to the private sector, which is not covered under the Act.
In a report titled Rights at Risk - Older People and Human Rights, it said "thousands of older people [were given]... little protection in law if abuse takes place".
The charity identified "institutional cultures" which breach human rights and cites major delays in providing essential services, and limited services with little choice.
'Revulsion and anger'
Lack of hygiene, the use of inappropriate restraints, both chemical and physical, and restricted access to food and water have been reported to it as existing in some health and care settings.
Senior policy advisor Tessa Harding: "High-profile and widely publicised cases of elder abuse and neglect rightly provoke revulsion and anger.
"Unless strong new laws are introduced to give older people specific protection against breaches in their human rights, the sorts of cases seen [recently] will continue to be treated only as a matter of poor standards."
She said a commission was needed to "deliver firm, clear messages about older people's human rights to all providers of health and care services".
Elderly people need better protection, the charity said
Human rights legislation is failing some vulnerable older people, according to charity Help the Aged.
The charity said gaps in the law left older people exposed to mistreatment which cannot be fully investigated or dealt with under the Human Rights Act.
It said that while statutory services were covered under the Act, the majority of care - which is contracted to the private sector - is not.
It urged the government to push forward with its planned equality bill.
The bill, included in the 2005 Queen's Speech, will establish a Commission for Equality and Human Rights, among other aims.
Champion needed
Help the Aged said such a body would have powers to champion older people's rights and could better protect them from abuse and neglect from carers.
The charity said the majority of older people's services - including more than 90% of care home places and nearly 70% of domiciliary care hours - are contracted out to the private sector, which is not covered under the Act.
In a report titled Rights at Risk - Older People and Human Rights, it said "thousands of older people [were given]... little protection in law if abuse takes place".
The charity identified "institutional cultures" which breach human rights and cites major delays in providing essential services, and limited services with little choice.
'Revulsion and anger'
Lack of hygiene, the use of inappropriate restraints, both chemical and physical, and restricted access to food and water have been reported to it as existing in some health and care settings.
Senior policy advisor Tessa Harding: "High-profile and widely publicised cases of elder abuse and neglect rightly provoke revulsion and anger.
"Unless strong new laws are introduced to give older people specific protection against breaches in their human rights, the sorts of cases seen [recently] will continue to be treated only as a matter of poor standards."
She said a commission was needed to "deliver firm, clear messages about older people's human rights to all providers of health and care services".
Care home residents 'drugged and tagged'
Care home residents 'drugged and tagged'
Severe staff shortages face many care homes
Care home residents are being subjected to widespread abuse because they fall outside mainstream society, a charity for older people has claimed.
Counsel and Care said some nursing staff admitted "indiscriminate" use of electronic tags to restrain elderly people against their will, and the use of sedative drugs to control "troublesome" residents.
Alison Clarke, co-author of the report Showing Restraint, told BBC News Online such treatment would not be tolerated for any other social group.
Counsel and Care has demanded new rules to govern the management of care homes and league tables to "name and shame" those mistreating residents.
Underpaid
According to the report the line between restraint and abuse is constantly crossed by overworked and underpaid nursing staff.
In some areas, if a big supermarket opens, half the staff disappear because they can get better pay
Alison Clarke
During a series of more than 50 seminars with care home workers, Counsel and Care also heard of residents being deprived of walking frames and rails placed around their beds to control movement.
Ms Clarke said: "You could say that putting someone in a bed with cot sides so they can't get out is assault, it's imprisoning them.
"It would be considered assault if it was done to you or me, but if it's done to an 80-year-old with dementia it's considered ordinary."
Staff shortages
Ms Clarke said some 500,000 elderly Britons live in care homes, but there are currently no national guidelines enforcing a minimum standard of care.
Substituting chemical management for good care denies older people their dignity
Paul Burstow
Lib Dem MP
Counsel and Care hopes that will change when a new National Care Standards Commission to regulate the industry begins work in April.
It said staff shortages are one of the biggest causes of the misuse of restraint, and called for better training and pay for care home staff.
Ms Clarke said: "There's a real problem in some areas with staff shortages. It's seen as a low status occupation, but it's very hard work and pay is often very low.
"In some areas, if a big supermarket opens, half the staff disappear because they can get better pay."
Calling for league tables showing the number of restraints used, the charity said similar close monitoring of homes in the US had led to better care for residents.
'Unacceptable'
The findings of the report were backed by the charity Action on Elder Abuse, which estimates that one in 20 older people are abused - many of them in care homes.
Its chairman, Peter Westland, said: "We are concerned about the level of denial that such abuse exists. The time has come for people to acknowledge the existence of this serious issue."
Liberal Democrat spokesman for older people, Paul Burstow, said the methods of restraint discovered were "unacceptable."
He said: "The over-medication of older people is a scandal. Substituting chemical management for good care denies older people their dignity."
Mr Burstow said the public needed reliable information about the quality of care in care homes.
The Counsel and Care report is published in the Nursing Times.
Severe staff shortages face many care homes
Care home residents are being subjected to widespread abuse because they fall outside mainstream society, a charity for older people has claimed.
Counsel and Care said some nursing staff admitted "indiscriminate" use of electronic tags to restrain elderly people against their will, and the use of sedative drugs to control "troublesome" residents.
Alison Clarke, co-author of the report Showing Restraint, told BBC News Online such treatment would not be tolerated for any other social group.
Counsel and Care has demanded new rules to govern the management of care homes and league tables to "name and shame" those mistreating residents.
Underpaid
According to the report the line between restraint and abuse is constantly crossed by overworked and underpaid nursing staff.
In some areas, if a big supermarket opens, half the staff disappear because they can get better pay
Alison Clarke
During a series of more than 50 seminars with care home workers, Counsel and Care also heard of residents being deprived of walking frames and rails placed around their beds to control movement.
Ms Clarke said: "You could say that putting someone in a bed with cot sides so they can't get out is assault, it's imprisoning them.
"It would be considered assault if it was done to you or me, but if it's done to an 80-year-old with dementia it's considered ordinary."
Staff shortages
Ms Clarke said some 500,000 elderly Britons live in care homes, but there are currently no national guidelines enforcing a minimum standard of care.
Substituting chemical management for good care denies older people their dignity
Paul Burstow
Lib Dem MP
Counsel and Care hopes that will change when a new National Care Standards Commission to regulate the industry begins work in April.
It said staff shortages are one of the biggest causes of the misuse of restraint, and called for better training and pay for care home staff.
Ms Clarke said: "There's a real problem in some areas with staff shortages. It's seen as a low status occupation, but it's very hard work and pay is often very low.
"In some areas, if a big supermarket opens, half the staff disappear because they can get better pay."
Calling for league tables showing the number of restraints used, the charity said similar close monitoring of homes in the US had led to better care for residents.
'Unacceptable'
The findings of the report were backed by the charity Action on Elder Abuse, which estimates that one in 20 older people are abused - many of them in care homes.
Its chairman, Peter Westland, said: "We are concerned about the level of denial that such abuse exists. The time has come for people to acknowledge the existence of this serious issue."
Liberal Democrat spokesman for older people, Paul Burstow, said the methods of restraint discovered were "unacceptable."
He said: "The over-medication of older people is a scandal. Substituting chemical management for good care denies older people their dignity."
Mr Burstow said the public needed reliable information about the quality of care in care homes.
The Counsel and Care report is published in the Nursing Times.
Thousands of old people 'drugged'
Thousands of old people 'drugged'
The Lib Dems want tighter checks on care homes
More than 22,000 elderly people in nursing homes are being given powerful sedatives for no medical reason, it has been claimed.
A report by the Liberal Democrats suggests residents who do not need these drugs are being kept sedated to make life easier for staff.
Its health spokesman Paul Burstow said the situation may be even worse in residential homes.
"Quite simply the over medication of older people is abuse," he said.
The report's figures are based on a review of British and international studies in this area and information released to parliament.
Under sedation
It is the Lib Dems' second report on the issue. According to Keep Taking the Medicine 2, up to 22,233 elderly nursing home residents are being given powerful anti-psychotics without medical grounds.
It suggests that another 32,000 elderly people in residential homes may also be at risk.
I find these figures very surprising
Spokeswoman,
National Care Homes Association
The report points to an increase in community prescriptions for antipsychotic drugs - up 6.2% between 1999 and 2002, an increase of 129,000 prescriptions.
It also shows that two out of three GP practices have missed a government target to introduce six-month reviews of medication for all over 75s. These reviews were supposed to have been up and running since April.
Mr Burstow called for tougher action to tackle the problem. He wants tighter checks on care homes and a new criminal offence of neglect of a vulnerable adult.
"Despite mounting evidence that older people are the victims of a chemical cosh in care homes, minister's have failed to get a grip on the problem.
"With serious shortages of specialist staff and little chance of attracting more, the evidence is that care homes are turning to chemical cocktails to make residents easier to manage," he said.
"It can result in death and it denies older people their dignity."
'Homes checked'
The Department of Health said care homes were required to keep "meticulous" drug records on every resident.
"If an inspector from the National Care Standards Commission finds evidence of over-prescription or maladministration of drugs, they have a duty to report such evidence to the police and the professional bodies of those involved for further action," a spokeswoman said.
"We are aware of concerns about the overuse of antipsychotics for older people, particularly those in care homes.
"Since March 2001, as part of the National Service Framework for older people, doctors, pharmacists and other health care professionals have been implementing a medicines management programme where medication is regularly reviewed to ensure that people receive the right medication."
However, the National Care Homes Association dismissed the claims.
"I find these figures very surprising," a spokeswoman told BBC News Online.
"Care homes don't prescribe drugs. Doctors prescribe drugs. If the Lib Dems are saying these drugs are being prescribed for no clinical reason and just to make the life of care home staff easier then it is doctors that need to be called to account."
Human rights law 'fails elderly'
Human rights law 'fails elderly'
Elderly people need better protection, the charity said
Human rights legislation is failing some vulnerable older people, according to charity Help the Aged.
The charity said gaps in the law left older people exposed to mistreatment which cannot be fully investigated or dealt with under the Human Rights Act.
It said that while statutory services were covered under the Act, the majority of care - which is contracted to the private sector - is not.
It urged the government to push forward with its planned equality bill.
The bill, included in the 2005 Queen's Speech, will establish a Commission for Equality and Human Rights, among other aims.
Champion needed
Help the Aged said such a body would have powers to champion older people's rights and could better protect them from abuse and neglect from carers.
The charity said the majority of older people's services - including more than 90% of care home places and nearly 70% of domiciliary care hours - are contracted out to the private sector, which is not covered under the Act.
In a report titled Rights at Risk - Older People and Human Rights, it said "thousands of older people [were given]... little protection in law if abuse takes place".
The charity identified "institutional cultures" which breach human rights and cites major delays in providing essential services, and limited services with little choice.
'Revulsion and anger'
Lack of hygiene, the use of inappropriate restraints, both chemical and physical, and restricted access to food and water have been reported to it as existing in some health and care settings.
Senior policy advisor Tessa Harding: "High-profile and widely publicised cases of elder abuse and neglect rightly provoke revulsion and anger.
"Unless strong new laws are introduced to give older people specific protection against breaches in their human rights, the sorts of cases seen [recently] will continue to be treated only as a matter of poor standards."
She said a commission was needed to "deliver firm, clear messages about older people's human rights to all providers of health and care services".
Why care home drug errors happen
Why care home drug errors happen
By Hannah Goff
BBC News health reporter
When inspectors said thousands of care home residents were being given the wrong medication - the image of a grotty, poorly run nursing home reared its stereotypical head.
How could something so simple as giving a patient their daily dose of tablets be going so wrong, so many times over?
There is concern about over-use of sedatives on elderly patients
But according to care professionals, management of residents' medication is one of the most complex areas of running a nursing home.
And unless fail-safe practices are adhered to, the results can be very damaging to both the resident and the care worker.
Adrian Webb, who runs a specialist mental health unit for elderly mentally ill people in central Manchester, says the main problem is that there are so many people in the chain.
An ordinary patient would take their GPs' prescription to the pharmacist and then, presumably, take the medication in the advised dose.
Each stage of the process there is potential for error.
Adrian Webb
In the case of a care or nursing home resident, there are so many more people inputting into the system.
The prescription might be written by a GP or consultant.
The pharmacist then has to make it up, then it will go to the staff in the home for storage and then a number of different people may be involved in the issuing the medication to patients.
Mr Webb, who is a registered nurse and oversees the distribution of drugs in the Victoria Park Nursing Home, says: "At each stage of the process there is potential for error.
"It has been known for prescriptions to come from doctors that are incorrect.
"But it's very easy for someone to type 100 instead of 10, for example."
Spotting errors
In the Victoria Park Nursing Home, which he runs with his wife, he checks every prescription that arrives from the doctor and pharmacist for errors.
And because he is a registered nurse, he has some knowledge of the kind of doses that ought to be expected and the drugs that are used.
He recalls one instance of receiving a batch of drugs which came from the pharmacist in the wrong dose.
The only way he knew it was incorrect was because he happened to know the higher dose pills were a different colour.
Here, it was his nursing experience which allowed him to spot the error.
But in a care home, where the administering of medicine is not carried out by a nurse, it is questionable whether a mistake such as that would have been noticed.
'Do not disturb'
"If you have not trained as a nurse are you really going to have the confidence to challenge the doctor or pharmacist about his prescription?," asks Mr Webb.
He also says the fact that a nurse could potentially lose his or her job over a medication error tends to focus the mind.
But Laura, a care assistant in the North West, who has worked in three homes for the elderly and one for people with learning disabilities over the past four years, says medication issues are taken extremely seriously indeed.
She said she spent the majority of her breaks drinking her coffee in front of a poster detailing what to do if a drug error occurs.
There are sheets for everybody coming into the home whether they are there for long or short term care and careful records of what medication is distributed, she says.
"The team leader is responsible for handing out the medication.
"There's a sign on the trolleys saying do not disturb while giving out medication and they are not disturbed," she said.
It's using the so-called chemical cosh instead of more skilled techniques to look after someone
Clive Evers
Alzheimer's Society
As in Mr Webb's nursing home, Miss Bates says the person giving out medication is focussed on that job and is not allowed to run off and answer a phone, for example.
But director of information at the Alzheimer's Society, Clive Evers argues the high turnover of staff and their limited training can been the odds are stacked against good practice.
"The workforce is very under-resourced and under-recognised. There is very limited training of staff.
"This is a workforce that would not be allowed to operate with children but they are allowed to work with adults in this way."
With up to 70% of people in care homes suffering from some form dementia, one might expect staff to have training in how to deal with their symptoms.
Care staff say drugs are closely monitored
But guidelines have only recently been adopted by the watchdog, the Commission for Social Care Inspection.
One of the other key worries in care homes is the over-use of anti-psychotic drugs and sedatives.
Over-medication is something that Mr Webb fights against in his nursing home for elderly patients with challenging behaviour.
Patients can take months to get over the heavy sedatives they are given during a visit to hospital, he says.
Good working relationships with GPs and consultants however allows his staff a certain level of control over what the patient is given.
"We give the minimum amount that is needed and it is reviewed regularly.
"We favour as little medication as possible to allow people to be themselves. The more medication people are on - the more problems they have."
But according to Mr Evers, not all homes have even this limited control over what their residents are prescribed.
"Neuroleptics (drugs) are used to limit behaviour that the care workers are not trained to deal with.
"It's using the so-called chemical cosh instead of more skilled techniques to look after someone. And unfortunately we know that this is still happening."
victims of drug errors,
There are more than 20,000 care homes in the UK
Elderly people living in care homes are being put at risk because of sub-standard systems for handing out medicine, according to a report.
University of London researchers found seven in 10 residents were victims of drug errors, having carried out half-day snapshot inspections of 55 homes.
They blamed inadequate information, over-worked staff, poor teamwork and often complex courses of medication.
The government said a review was focusing on medication "weaknesses".
Nurses are part of some of the workforces in specialist units caring for people with severe problems, such as late stage dementia.
This is just one of the many flaws in the current care system which can have a huge impact on the quality of life for many older people
Andrew Harrop, of Age Concern and Help the Aged
But the majority of teams working in more than 20,000 care homes across the UK do not include people with clinical training.
Instead, they rely on pharmacists and GPs signing-off repeat prescription requests without any or little face-to-face contact with residents.
The report, published in the journal Quality and Safety in Health Care, said the system meant vulnerable residents were put at risk.
During the inspections, which took place in the mornings when two-thirds of the daily drug courses would be taken, researchers gathered data on 256 residents.
In total, mistakes were made in 178 cases with many the victims of more than one error.
The most common mistakes involved wrong dosages, insufficient monitoring of residents after medication had been taken and people being given the drug at the wrong time.
But rather than blaming the care home staff, the researchers said they were often not given enough training or information about handing out medication.
The report said part of the problem was that care home residents were increasingly being given complex courses of medication - each resident was taking eight different pills on average a day.
Lead researcher Professor Nick Barber said: "It is a cause for concern. Residents are usually taking a cocktail of medicines and are more susceptible to drug side-effects as a consequences of ageing.
"I think care homes need more help. Pharmacists and GPs should be taking more responsibility and visiting care homes more than they do."
Consequences
The researchers also collated information on the consequences of the mistakes.
Most were only minor, although one resident did suffer a thyroid complication.
Sheila Scott, of the National Care Association, agreed care homes needed help.
"Mistakes are always indefensible, but this is a problem we keep hearing about," she said.
"We need to face this challenge and find a solution. Staff working in care homes are not medically trained and yet they are being asked to look after people with more and more complex needs."
Andrew Harrop, of the newly merged Age Concern and Help the Aged charity, said the findings were "shocking".
"This is just one of the many flaws in the current care system which can have a huge impact on the quality of life for many older people."
The Department of Health said the government was aware of the issue and was now working with the regulator, the Care Quality Commission, which was carrying out a review of healthcare in care homes.
A spokeswoman added: "The review will take into account the findings of the research and will focus on strengthening weaknesses in the systems involving medication."
Monday, 5 October 2009
Seasonal Affective Disorder
/ that time of year again in Britain , 6.00 a.m. in the morning and it is still very dark. The autumn equinox has passed
and the hours of daylight are decreasing rapidly, this will continue until December 21st the shortest day of our year ,
after that the light will increase gradually peaking on June 21 next year.
Enter SAD seasonally affected disorder, or lack of daylight,
SAD () is a type of winter depression that affects an estimated
7% of the UK population every winter between September and April, in particular during
December, January and February.
It is caused by a biochemical imbalance in the hypothalamus due to the shortening of daylight hours and the lack of sunlight in winter.
For many people SAD is a seriously disabling illness, preventing them from functioning normally without continuous medical treatment.
For others, it is a mild but debilitating condition causing discomfort but not severe suffering. We call this subsyndromal SAD or 'winter blues.'
It is estimated that a further 17% of the UK population have this milder form of condition.
Feeding 'speeds surgery recovery'
Feeding 'speeds surgery recovery'
Gastrointestinal surgery patients are often starved after the operation
Cancer patients recover faster from gastrointestinal surgery if given liquid food directly into the intestine, a study suggests.
The research, on 121 patients, was carried out by Cardiff University.
Its authors said widespread adoption of the practice could potentially save the NHS millions of pounds.
Oesophageal, stomach and pancreatic cancer patients usually fast, or are nil by mouth, for up to 10 days after gastrointestinal surgery.
We turned the traditional thinking to starve patients after major gastrointestinal surgery on its head and have found huge benefits
Dr Rachael Barlow
Cardiff University
It had been thought nutrition hampered patients' recovery.
But the latest trial suggests that theory is wrong.
It found that patients given nutrition directly into the intestine through a feeding tube recovered around three days faster than those who were fasted and only given basic hydration.
Patients also developed fewer major complications following their surgery.
The researchers believe that if liquid food is given after all major abdominal and thoracic surgery it could save the NHS millions of pounds.
Lead researcher Dr Rachael Barlow said: "In our trial we turned the traditional thinking to starve patients after major gastrointestinal surgery on its head and have found huge benefits.
"The striking find that nutrients straight after surgery meant patients recovered quicker and tended to have fewer complications has major implications for the NHS.
"It may result in a saving of millions of pounds and could mean fewer bed shortages in hospitals."
High cost
Dr Barlow said a day in an NHS general or surgical ward costs up to £400 and in an intensive care unit it can cost in excess of £1,200.
"In this economic climate of financial deficits, finding new ways of improving care is important for NHS managers.
"The next step is to find out if we can adopt the same practice in other types of surgery and we are hoping to run more clinical trials in this area."
The research will be presented to the National Cancer Research Institute Conference (NCRI).
Professor Sir Kenneth Calman, chair of the NCRI, said: "This result shows that a small change in follow up care after operations for oesophagus, stomach and pancreas cancer could benefit patients and have huge cost saving implications for the NHS.
"We look forward to seeing the results of further clinical trials to see if the same technique of food after surgery can be applied to patients who have had operations for other types of cancers."
Feeding 'speeds surgery recovery'
Feeding 'speeds surgery recovery'
http://www.richimag.co.uk/healthy/
Gastrointestinal surgery patients are often starved after the operation
Cancer patients recover faster from gastrointestinal surgery if given liquid food directly into the intestine, a study suggests.
The research, on 121 patients, was carried out by Cardiff University.
Its authors said widespread adoption of the practice could potentially save the NHS millions of pounds.
Oesophageal, stomach and pancreatic cancer patients usually fast, or are nil by mouth, for up to 10 days after gastrointestinal surgery.
We turned the traditional thinking to starve patients after major gastrointestinal surgery on its head and have found huge benefits
Dr Rachael Barlow
Cardiff University
It had been thought nutrition hampered patients' recovery.
But the latest trial suggests that theory is wrong.
It found that patients given nutrition directly into the intestine through a feeding tube recovered around three days faster than those who were fasted and only given basic hydration.
Patients also developed fewer major complications following their surgery.
The researchers believe that if liquid food is given after all major abdominal and thoracic surgery it could save the NHS millions of pounds.
Lead researcher Dr Rachael Barlow said: "In our trial we turned the traditional thinking to starve patients after major gastrointestinal surgery on its head and have found huge benefits.
"The striking find that nutrients straight after surgery meant patients recovered quicker and tended to have fewer complications has major implications for the NHS.
"It may result in a saving of millions of pounds and could mean fewer bed shortages in hospitals."
High cost
Dr Barlow said a day in an NHS general or surgical ward costs up to £400 and in an intensive care unit it can cost in excess of £1,200.
"In this economic climate of financial deficits, finding new ways of improving care is important for NHS managers.
"The next step is to find out if we can adopt the same practice in other types of surgery and we are hoping to run more clinical trials in this area."
The research will be presented to the National Cancer Research Institute Conference (NCRI).
Professor Sir Kenneth Calman, chair of the NCRI, said: "This result shows that a small change in follow up care after operations for oesophagus, stomach and pancreas cancer could benefit patients and have huge cost saving implications for the NHS.
"We look forward to seeing the results of further clinical trials to see if the same technique of food after surgery can be applied to patients who have had operations for other types of cancers."
http://www.richimag.co.uk/healthy/
Gastrointestinal surgery patients are often starved after the operation
Cancer patients recover faster from gastrointestinal surgery if given liquid food directly into the intestine, a study suggests.
The research, on 121 patients, was carried out by Cardiff University.
Its authors said widespread adoption of the practice could potentially save the NHS millions of pounds.
Oesophageal, stomach and pancreatic cancer patients usually fast, or are nil by mouth, for up to 10 days after gastrointestinal surgery.
We turned the traditional thinking to starve patients after major gastrointestinal surgery on its head and have found huge benefits
Dr Rachael Barlow
Cardiff University
It had been thought nutrition hampered patients' recovery.
But the latest trial suggests that theory is wrong.
It found that patients given nutrition directly into the intestine through a feeding tube recovered around three days faster than those who were fasted and only given basic hydration.
Patients also developed fewer major complications following their surgery.
The researchers believe that if liquid food is given after all major abdominal and thoracic surgery it could save the NHS millions of pounds.
Lead researcher Dr Rachael Barlow said: "In our trial we turned the traditional thinking to starve patients after major gastrointestinal surgery on its head and have found huge benefits.
"The striking find that nutrients straight after surgery meant patients recovered quicker and tended to have fewer complications has major implications for the NHS.
"It may result in a saving of millions of pounds and could mean fewer bed shortages in hospitals."
High cost
Dr Barlow said a day in an NHS general or surgical ward costs up to £400 and in an intensive care unit it can cost in excess of £1,200.
"In this economic climate of financial deficits, finding new ways of improving care is important for NHS managers.
"The next step is to find out if we can adopt the same practice in other types of surgery and we are hoping to run more clinical trials in this area."
The research will be presented to the National Cancer Research Institute Conference (NCRI).
Professor Sir Kenneth Calman, chair of the NCRI, said: "This result shows that a small change in follow up care after operations for oesophagus, stomach and pancreas cancer could benefit patients and have huge cost saving implications for the NHS.
"We look forward to seeing the results of further clinical trials to see if the same technique of food after surgery can be applied to patients who have had operations for other types of cancers."
Saturday, 3 October 2009
Probiotic health claims dismissed
www.richimag.co.uk/yoga/be happy may help
Probiotic health claims dismissed
Lactobacillus bulgaricus is one of the probiotics found in health drinks and yoghurts
General health claims for "probiotic" drinks and yogurts have been dismissed by a team of experts from the European Union.
Their opinions will now be voted on by an EU Committee which is drawing up a list of permitted health claims.
Scientists at the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) looked at 180 health claims for the supplements.
They rejected 10 claims and said a further 170 had not provided enough evidence of their effects.
The manufacturers of best-selling yogurt drinks Actimel and Yakult have submitted claims that will be considered at a later stage.
EFSA is reviewing all health claims made for food products following the introduction of a new EU law in 2006 which stipulated that all medical-sounding marketing claims must be verified.
The European Commission will eventually consider the list drawn up by the EU committee and develop legislation which will be voted on by member states.
No products or health claims will change until that legislation is published.
Albert Flynn, who chairs the EFSA panel which looked at these claims, said the first stage had been to look at general health claims for the products.
More specific claims from individual manufacturers will be considered next.
He said: "It's been an issue for some time that general health claims are made about these products using the family name for the active ingredient and not saying which member of the family is in the pot.
"We expect the claims that will come now from the companies will be much more specific."
A Yakult spokesman said: "Yakult has submitted claims for Lactobacillus casei Shirota, a well characterised probiotic strain unique to Yakult.
"Evidence for its health benefit is based on over 70 human studies and over 70 years of research.
"Opinions on claims submitted for this strain are not expected until 2010."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Featured post
More patients in Scotland given antidepressants
More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015 From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...
-
Murder and persecution of women and children accused of being witches is spreading around the world and destroying the lives of millions ...
-
Final day reveals cross surprise By Jemima Laing BBC Devon Alistair Courtney, archaeological student at City College Plymout...
-
Victims of a craze for cosmetic surgery By Stephen Evans BBC News, Seoul Continue reading the main story In today's Magazine ...