Showing posts with label care for the elderly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label care for the elderly. Show all posts

Sunday 4 November 2012

Liverpool Care Pathway: Relatives 'must be informed


Liverpool Care Pathway: Relatives 'must be informed'Elderly man's hands

There will be a 12-week consultation on the proposed changes to the NHS constitution

Related Stories

Relatives of terminally-ill patients would have to be consulted before a decision to withdraw food or water is taken, under new government proposals.
It comes after some patients were placed on the Liverpool Care Pathway - designed to relieve suffering - without their relatives' knowledge.
The government wants to ensure families are told of life and death decisions.
The instruction will be included in a number of proposed changes to the NHS Constitution to be unveiled on Monday.
The Liverpool Care Pathway was developed at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital and the city's Marie Curie hospice to relieve suffering in dying patients, setting out principles for their treatment in their final days and hours.
Supporters say it can make the end of a patient's life as comfortable as possible and the method is also widely backed by doctors and many health charities.
However, critics argue it can be inhumane.
The government has now said that the rules needed to be stricter, meaning relatives of patients are always consulted before the technique is applied.
'New right'
A Department of Health (DoH) spokesman said the proposed changes would set out a "new right" under the NHS Constitution, which was established by the Health Act 2009, but he stopped short of describing the move as a "legal requirement".
However, the spokesman added: "Anybody providing NHS services is required by law to take account of it [the NHS constitution] in their decisions and actions."
Some reports suggested health trusts that failed to involve patients and families in decisions could be sued, while doctors could face being struck off.
The DoH spokesman said it was unlikely policy had been developed on this as the proposal was still at an early stage.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt will launch a 12-week consultation on the proposed changes to the constitution - the formal statement of patients' rights - on Monday.
Health minister Norman Lamb said this week that it was "completely wrong" for terminally-ill patients to be put on a "pathway" to death without relatives being consulted.
Mr Lamb has called a meeting of doctors and patients to discuss worries about the pathway.
Meanwhile, Conservative peer Baroness Knight called for an inquiry into claims some people might have survived had they not received this treatment.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Monday 29 October 2012

Care homes given five star ratings fail key standards


Care homes given five star ratings fail key standards

But critics say this is a "cheque book system" open to any home prepared to pay for a rating.Care homeCare homes with five-star ratings are receiving premium fees despite not meeting essential standards set out by the care regulator.
Local authorities pay higher fees to care homes awarded top ratings.
The Care Quality Commission advises people to visit homes and check their most recent CQC inspection report before making a decision on care.
Care regulator the Care Quality Commission (CQC) stopped issuing its own star ratings in 2010 and now some homes pay independent ratings companies and consultants to assess them instead.
Gwenda Dunn was surprised to find that her aunt's care home had been awarded five stars by such a company.
"This is not a complaint against the home - it's a complaint as to how the home could be given five stars when it patently was not," she told the BBC's 5 live Investigates.
5 star failures
Mrs Dunn says her aunt's room was often cold and calls from her aunt for a commode during the night were sometimes ignored by staff.
Also, her aunt was frequently disturbed by another patient with dementia who often entered her room uninvited.
"I was there when the inspection was done. I spoke to the inspector and raised a fair amount of issues and then we found out within a week that the home had got five stars again," says Mrs Dunn.
"People who aren't in the know would take it as face value, not recognising the reality."
The home was rated by David Allen, an independent consultant who trades under Prestige Quality Ratings (PQR).
Mr Allen says the issues raised with him lacked substance and were misplaced. He also says other people at the home spoke very highly of the care provided and he saw no reason to downgrade the home.
PQR is one of three independent ratings companies recognised by Sefton Council. The others are RDB Star Rating Limited and Assured Care.
With the top five-star rating attached, families might believe a home is providing an outstanding level of care.
But the BBC has found that out of 80 homes given a four or five-star rating in the Sefton area, 14 are failing to meet one or more of the essential standards set out by the CQC.
This includes standards of staffing, standards of treating people with respect and standards of caring for people safely and protecting them from harm.
A day centre for the elderlyAll of the homes had been rated by either RDB Star Rating, Assured Care or PQR.
The CQC is taking action against two of the highly-rated homes, demanding immediate improvements be made - although it is not known which company provided their rating.
All three ratings companies have defended their awards system.
"I always take account of what the CQC have to say… but the CQC doesn't have to be right every time," says Frank Watts of Assured Care.
David Allen of PQR insists that his company's ratings are "accurate reflections of the quality of the care provided at care homes at the time of the assessment".
RDB Star Rating told the BBC its assessments were "comprehensive and reliable".
Higher fees for homes
Sefton Council pays a quality premium to homes given a high rating by the companies - a residential or nursing home with five stars receives an additional £40 per week on top of the basic fee paid for each person in its care.A spokesman for Sefton Council said: "All the companies providing quality ratings use assessment criteria linked to outcomes in care home provision.
An old lady sits at a table"We work closely with the CQC to ensure quality standards are closely monitored. If either party feel standards have reduced, through their own monitoring activity or inspections, we will decline or even suspend a particular rating and work with CQC in relation to this."
Sefton council is not the only one to pay a quality premium to homes awarded a four or five-star rating.
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council says that since it introduced the RDB rating scheme in 2001, standards of care homes across the borough have improved.
But the BBC has learned that a quarter of its highly rated homes are failing to meet all the essential standards set out by the CQC.
"The council does feel that a new quality assessment tool would help to continue the drive to improve the quality of provision and therefore the RDB scheme will cease to be used at the end of this financial year," a council spokesperson said.
While the old Care Quality Commission rating system did have problems, critics say it was at least a system which was nationally recognised, independent, and easy for the public to understand.
"We maintain it is the responsibility of CQC as the regulator to assess the quality of care homes," says Nadra Ahmed, chair of the National Care Association which represents care homes.
"When the star rating system was scrapped by the CQC they consulted on the introduction of a system whereby assessments would be carried out by organisations independent of the CQC, which would be selected through a tendering process.
"The process was voluntary, so providers would pay to be assessed. The National Care Association felt strongly that this would be a cheque book rating system which enabled those who could afford it, to purchase a rating."
Bupa, the UK's second-largest care home group, is also critical of the CQC for abolishing its rating system:
"We would like to see them [star ratings] back so people can identify excellent care homes," said a company spokesperson.
"Other organisations, such as local councils and independent companies, are creating their own systems - but this could be confusing because there is no consistency."
The CQC warns people not to rely on ratings from outside companies when choosing a home.
"We do not endorse any external ratings systems," CQC operations director Amanda Sherlock told the BBC.
"We would recommend people look at a range of information includingour website to get the latest reports into care homes, nursing homes, hospitals and other care providers."

Sunday 23 September 2012

Care funding reform failure blamed on Treasury


Care funding reform failure blamed on Treasury

Paul BurstowThe former care services minister lost his job at the recent reshuffle
The Treasury is to blame for a failure to reform care funding in England, a former Lib Dem minister has said.
Paul Burstow said the Treasury saw no need for change and was happy to "kick the can down the road".
Care groups have backed a proposal that the state cover elderly and disabled people's care costs over £35,000.
The government, which is continuing to look into cheaper options, said the Treasury had played a major part in getting care back onto the agenda.
Ministers have said they support the principle of a cap, proposed by the independent Dilnot Commission - but as yet there is no commitment to finding the money to pay for it.
The Dilnot package would cost the Treasury almost £2bn a year.
'Historic opportunity'
The government is expected to include its plans on paying for the cost of care in the next spending review, to begin next year.
Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Mr Burstow - a former care services minister - said there was a "historic opportunity" to change the system for the better but feared that the government would put it "back in the too difficult drawer".
"The coalition made a good start, setting up the Dilnot Commission within two months of taking office. But sustaining that pace has been tough," he said.
One of the reasons behind this was, he said, reluctance from the Treasury to back the reforms.
"The Treasury's view is simple, kick the can down the road despite our rising elderly population. No sense of urgency. No recognition that left unreformed there is no incentive for families to plan and prepare.
"In the view of mandarins there is no need for change, and certainly not yet. That has been the Treasury line every time a reform plan has popped its head above the parapet."
Mr Burstow, who lost his job in the recent reshuffle, said he had received more correspondence from MPs about care costs than any other topic.
"The good news is so far the Treasury has failed to smother the latest plan, a cap on lifetime care costs," he added.
"Ending the scandal of people forced to sell their homes to pay for care would be a legacy for this government felt for generations."
'Reaching consensus'

Who gets what care

social care promo image
He later told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the government had made "a lot of progress" on the issue but urged Mr Osborne to show the "political will" to go the final step.
"The division, I think, is between the Treasury and everyone else. Both the prime minister and deputy prime minister have signalled over the summer their determination to see this now happen but that does require the Treasury to actively engage with the Department of Health to work through how you pay for it and actually deliver this reform...
"In the end, it does require the chancellor of the day to actually say 'this has to be a priority and this is now what we are going to deliver'."
A coalition spokesman branded Mr Burstow's remarks as "rubbish".
"Unlike under the previous government, the Treasury has played a major part in getting Dilnot back onto the agenda, not least by working to ensure we have the sustainable public finances that are necessary if it is to be delivered."
Labour said there were "no simple solutions" to the rising cost of caring for the elderly and cross-party co-operation was essential to agree a way forward.
"Labour has been warning for months that the government is kicking long-term care funding into the long grass," Liz Kendall, shadow minister for care and older people, said.
"All the parties must now come together to try and reach consensus about how we tackle the immediate care crisis and develop a better, fairer system for the future."

Thursday 30 August 2012

Vitamin B3 'helps kill superbugs'????


Vitamin B3 'helps kill superbugs'


Drug-resistant MRSAAntibiotic resistance is increasing

Related Stories

Vitamin B3 could be the new weapon in the fight against superbugs such as MRSA, researchers have suggested.
US experts found B3, also known as nicotinamide, boosts the ability of immune cells to kill Staphylococcus bacteria.
B3 increases the numbers and efficacy of neutrophils, white blood cells that can kill and eat harmful bugs.
The study, in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, could lead to a "major change in treatment", a UK expert said.
B3 was tested on Staphylococcal infections, such as the potentially fatal MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus).
Such infections are found in hospitals and nursing homes, but are also on the rise in prisons, the military and among athletes.
'Turn on'
The scientists used extremely high doses of B3 - far higher than that obtained from dietary sources - in their tests, carried out both on animals and on human blood.

Start Quote

I cannot see why this couldn't be used straight away in infected patients”
Prof Mark Enright,University of Bath
And the researchers say there is as yet no evidence that dietary B3 or supplements could prevent or treat bacterial infections.
The researchers say B3 appears to be able to "turn on" certain antimicrobial genes, boosting the immune cells' killing power.
Prof Adrian Gombart, of Oregon State University's Linus Pauling Institute, who worked on the research, said: "This is potentially very significant, although we still need to do human studies.
"Antibiotics are wonder drugs, but they face increasing problems with resistance by various types of bacteria, especially Staphylococcus aureus.
"This could give us a new way to treat Staph infections that can be deadly, and might be used in combination with current antibiotics.
"It's a way to tap into the power of the innate immune system and stimulate it to provide a more powerful and natural immune response."
Prof Mark Enright, of the University of Bath, said: "Neutrophils are really the front line against infections in the blood and the use of nicotinamide seems safe at this dose to use in patients as it is already licensed for use.
"This could cause a major change in treatment for infections alongside conventional antibiotics to help bolster patients immune system.
"I would like to see in patient clinical trials but cannot see why this couldn't be used straight away in infected patients."

More on This Story

Related Stories

Wednesday 29 August 2012

Personal care costs rise by 150% in seven years


Personal care costs rise by 150% in seven years

Generic image of pensionersAbout 77,000 people now receive help in their own homes and in care homes

Related Stories

The cost of providing free personal care to people in their own homes has risen by more than 150% in seven years, according to the Scottish government.
Helping people with personal care such as washing and dressing cost £342m in 2010-11, up from £133m in 2003-04.
The government said the rise reflected the fact that an increasing proportion of older people were cared for at home rather than in hospital or care homes.
Personal care costs for people in care homes rose by 25%, from £86m to £108m.
Personal or nursing care payments are available to self-funding care home residents who have assets, including property, worth more than £23,500.
The number of people receiving these payments to help pay their care home fees increased steadily in the first few years of the policy. Currently, just under a third of all older people in care homes receive the payments.
The number of people receiving free personal care at home has also increased by 42% over the same period, from 32,870 in 2003-04 to 46,720 in 2010-11.

Start Quote

A responsible government in Scotland cannot ignore the facts, kidding everyone on that everything and anything is affordable”
Jackson CarlawScottish Tory health spokesman
Free personal care was introduced by the Scottish government in 2002, and the policy was reviewed in 2008.
About 77,000 people in Scotland now receive help in their own homes and in care homes compared with 64,000 when the policy was first introduced.
Jackson Carlaw, Scottish Conservative health spokesman and deputy leader MSP, said: "If the SNP wants to continue funding free personal care, then it has to be far less casual in extending other entitlements and refusing to find ways to make them more sustainable.
"That is why we opposed free prescriptions, and why we want to align free transport to the pensionable age in future.
"A responsible government in Scotland cannot ignore the facts, kidding everyone on that everything and anything is affordable. We all know that there is an unprecedented demographic challenge waiting around the corner."
Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health speaker, said her party was fully committed to the policy.
But she added: "My fear is the quality of care we provide for people will be compromised as a result of the strain on finances and the elderly and the vulnerable will pay another kind of price in a drop in standards of care.
"We have previously suggested creating a National Care Service to join up budgets and set a minimum standard of care but are open to working with the Scottish government to look at ways to ensure personal care is sustainable in the long-term."
'Greatly valued service'
Health Secretary, Nicola Sturgeon, said: "These figures show that each year an increasing number of older people continue to benefit from free personal and nursing care.
"This reflects the Scottish government's focus on more intensive support to frail older people at home or in a homely setting, as well as the continuing shift in the balance of care towards providing care at home.
"We are fully committed to the funding of free personal care for the elderly, a service greatly valued by the people of Scotland.
"The challenges posed by an ageing population demonstrate why we want to see health and social care for adults delivered in an integrated way by NHS.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Wednesday 13 June 2012

Elderly denied NHS care


Elderly denied NHS care 'can sue'

Elderly patient in hospital Wellbeing and dignity must be upheld

Related Stories

Age discrimination by NHS hospitals is to be outlawed, ministers have announced.
From October, elderly patients will have the right to sue if they have been denied care based on age alone, says Care Minister Paul Burstow.
This will not mean patients can demand any treatment they want. Care decisions will still be judged according to clinical need by doctors.
But NHS staff will have a legal duty to consider wellbeing and dignity.

“Start Quote

It sends a clear message to service providers that discrimination law will in future also protect older people”
End Quote Michelle Mitchell Age UK
The decision, which applies to hospitals in England, Wales and Scotland, follows a consultation exercise on the issue by the Home Office.
The charity Age UK said it was long overdue but good news.
Equal rights Age discrimination in the workplace is already unlawful, but until now there was no equivalent legal requirement on public and private services.
This has led to inconsistent practices and unfair treatment, with the needs of older people in particular being ignored, the government says.

Too old?

When Kenneth Worden, from Chester, was diagnosed with an aggressive form of bladder cancer he was told by doctors that he was too old at the age of 78 to have surgery.
But his daughter Michele Halligan, who is trained as a midwife, disagreed. She was determined that her father should have the treatment in a bid to ease his distressing symptoms - he was in a great deal of pain and had disturbed sleep because of he had to use the toilet every half hour.
After more consultations Kenneth was eventually treated by surgeons at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham.
Three years on from his surgery he is fit and well with no signs of the cancer returning.
An investigation by The King's Fund recently found treatable conditions such as incontinence and depression were sometimes ignored in older patients.
Last year the Health Service Ombudsman accused the NHS of failing to meet "even the most basic standards of care" for the over-65s in England.
Mr Burstow said: "I have heard numerous stories from people who feel that they have been discriminated against.
"One 84-year-old lady told how her doctor had been treating her for angina for years.
"Two years ago, she had an appointment to have an operation on a bunion on her big toe. However, because of the angina, they sent her for a heart scan.
"They found that it was not angina, but actually a leaky valve. She asked if she could have this fixed and the doctors said: 'What are you bothered about, at your age?'
"I am pleased to say she stuck to her guns and said she wanted the job done. At long last, she has managed to get an appointment but the whole experience made her feel pushed aside.
"This is exactly the kind of discrimination we want to rule out in the NHS."

The ban means:

  • Chronological age alone will no longer be a barrier to treatment
  • Clinical decisions should be based on clinical need and how fit someone is regardless of age
  • There is an onus to consider the wellbeing and dignity of older people
There will be specific exceptions from the new law, for example insurance companies will still be able to use age when assessing risk and deciding prices.
Michelle Mitchell, charity director general of Age UK, said: "We hope the new law which will apply to the NHS, social care and other services will prevent older people being denied proper treatment because of their age.
"It sends a clear message to service providers that discrimination law will in future also protect older people."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...