Saturday, 14 February 2015

NHS 'to get whistleblower guardians'

NHS 'to get whistleblower guardians'

A nurse and another member of hospital staff pushing a trolley bed in a hospital

Related Stories

NHS trusts will have to appoint a guardian to help whistleblowers in England, ministers have confirmed.
The measure was called for by Sir Robert Francis after he warned staff too often faced "bullying and being isolated" when they tried to speak out.
Sir Robert, who led the public inquiry into the Stafford Hospital scandal, also said a new national officer should be appointed to help the guardians.
The government immediately accepted all his recommendations.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said: "If we don't get the culture right we will never deliver the ambitions we have for the NHS."
He said he agreed with the proposals in principle, but would now consult on how best to implement them.
And he added legislation to ensure whistleblowers were not discriminated against when they went for other jobs would also be introduced.
Sir Robert's Freedom to Speak Up Review took evidence from over 600 people about their experiences, while another 19,000 responded to an online survey.
It said there were lots of examples of organisations supporting whistleblowers.
But it also said too many were put off speaking up because they "fear victimisation", while others do not raise concerns because they feel they will not be listened too.
The review heard stories of staff that have faced isolation, bullying and counter-allegations.
In some extreme cases when staff had been brave enough to speak up their lives had been ruined, it said.
Robert FrancisA "significant proportion" of health workers are afraid to speak out, Sir Robert Francis said
Sir Robert told the BBC: "I've heard some frankly shocking stories about [staff] whose health has suffered, and in rare cases who've felt suicidal as a result of their perception of them being ignored or worse."
He said raising concerns should be "welcomed and celebrated".
His review called for:
  • A "Freedom to Speak Up Guardian" to be appointed in every NHS trust to support staff, particularly junior members.
  • A national independent officer to help guardians when cases are going wrong.
  • A new support scheme to help NHS staff who have found themselves out of a job as a result of raising concerns.
  • Processes established at all trusts to make sure concerns are heard and investigated properly.
line
Analysis
By Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor
Perhaps the most eye-catching remark by Sir Robert Francis this morning is that two years, almost to the day, since his final report on the Mid Staffordshire scandal there is still a "serious problem in the NHS" relating to whistleblowers.
Sir Robert says that even after the drive for transparency following Mid Staffs there are still too many staff who are afraid and who had told his review they had seen colleagues suffer.
He proposes there should be "guardians" appointed at hospitals to support whistleblowers, but if the trusts pay their salaries will they be truly independent?
Sir Robert does not feel he can offer an amnesty for whistleblowers currently in dispute with employers - the legal process, in his view, must be left to take its course though he urges employers involved in cases to "reflect" on his report.
Sir Robert pointed out that the key change needed related to cultural rather than regulatory reform.
Few would disagree that culture change needs more than a report from an eminent QC.
line
The recommendations have been made despite a growing focus on patient safety since Sir Robert published his public inquiry in 2013 into the Stafford Hospital scandal.
One of the main findings of that report was that people within the NHS knew about the poor levels of care at the hospital, but did not raise the alarm.
Since then a number of initiatives have been launched to improve safety.
Jeremy Hunt: "The message must go out today that we are calling time on bullying, intimidation and victimisation which has no place in our NHS"
In 2012 NHS Employers launched its "Speaking Up Charter" asking trusts to commit to helping staff raise concerns.
And last year the government unveiled its "Sign Up to Safety Campaign" - a three-year plan to halve avoidable harm through greater transparency, collaboration with other trusts and support for staff.
But Sir Robert said the NHS had still not got it right.
He argued: "There is a serious issue within the NHS. It's not just about whistleblowing, it is fundamentally a patient safety issue.
"The NHS is blessed with staff who want to do the best for their patients. They want to be able to raise their concerns free of fear that they may be badly treated when they do so and confident that effective action will be taken.
"Unfortunately I heard shocking accounts from distressed NHS staff who did not have this experience when they spoke up."
line
Case study
Nurse with patients
Staff who gave evidence to the review complained of being labelled a "snitch" and being "punished" if they raised concerns.
One nurse described what happened to her after she complained during a team meeting about the care being provided at her trust.
She was later called into an office by two managers and shouted at until she was reduced to tears.
She then described being criticised at every opportunity thereafter and at her next appraisal the comments from managers were critical. Her mental health was also questioned.
She said, to her knowledge, the concerns she raised were never looked into and she did not pursue it for fear it would damage her career.
line
'Persecution'
Dr Raj Mattu, a cardiologist who was suspended then sacked after raising concerns about patient safety in 2001, said it was frustrating and depressing that there had been "very few biting changes" to protect whistleblowers.
He said there was still "persecution of whistleblowers on a grand scale" in the NHS.
Dr Kim Holt: "I don't want any whistleblower to suffer like I did"
Asked why this was the case, he said medical staff were in their jobs because they wanted to help patients but many senior staff were there for a "career in management".
"What then happens is the interests of the trusts and the NHS conflict from time to time with those of the patient and many of us who are whistleblowers feel compelled under moral obligation to speak up," he said.
He called for independent assessment of whistleblowers' claims, and "real protections" for those raising concerns.
Dr Mark Porter, of the British Medical Association, said: "The freedom to raise concerns without fear of reprisal is vitally important for patient safety.
"We need to put an end to the climate of fear that has built up in the NHS over a number of years, and everyone in the NHS - especially those in managerial and leadership positions - must lead by example to make this a reality."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites
en → br
NHS

Friday, 23 January 2015

Treatment of whistleblowers a stain on NHS, say MPs

Treatment of whistleblowers a stain on NHS, say MPs

Nurse with patients

Related Stories

The failure to protect whistleblowers remains a "stain" on the reputation of the NHS in England, MPs have said.
The Health Select Committee says the treatment of staff who raise concerns has undermined trust in the system.
And whistleblowers who are vindicated should receive an apology and "practical redress", its report adds.
The MPs also say the complaints system for patients is complex and confusing and there should be a "single gateway" covering health and social care.
The report says despite numerous inquiries and reports highlighting failings in complaint-handling and whistleblowing, serious shortcomings remain.
It emphasises the importance of ensuring health and care workers feel supported in raising professional concerns.
"The treatment of whistleblowers is a stain on the reputation of the NHS and has led to unwarranted, inexcusable pain for the courageous individuals affected," it says.
Open culture
The report acknowledges there have been some attempts to create an open culture, where staff are encouraged to raise concerns, and there is a proper response.
But it concludes these initiatives are "far from common", and warns other potential whistleblowers may be deterred from coming forward.
"This has undermined trust in the system's ability to treat whistleblowers with fairness. This lack of confidence about the consequences of raising concerns has implications for patient safety."
The MPs are calling for a programme to identify whistleblowers whose actions are proven to have been vindicated. They say they should receive an apology and "practical redress", which could mean financial recompense, or - in some cases - getting their job back.

Start Quote

Patients and staff do not complain for financial redress but because they seek an acknowledgement and explanation, a timely apology if appropriate and for the NHS to reduce the chance of avoidable harm to others”
Dr Sarah WollastonChairwoman, Health Select Committee
'Breakdown of trust'
They also highlight continued failings in the way the NHS responds to patients' complaints. They say despite some progress, the current system remains "variable".
Too many individual cases are "mishandled", they say, sometimes leading to a "complete breakdown of trust" between patients and the NHS, and a failure to improve patient safety.
They argue the current "overly complex" system should be simplified by establishing a single complaints gateway covering health and social care. They suggest this could be modelled on the Complaints Wales service run by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.
Alongside this they say there is a "strong case" for the creation of a single health and social care ombudsman for England.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has welcomed the report.
"We want to make the NHS the safest healthcare system in the world and we know that listening to patients and staff is absolutely vital to improve care.
"That's why we've made hospitals legally obliged to apologise to patients when mistakes do happen, introduced complaints handling as a crucial element of tougher hospital inspections and have asked Sir Robert Francis to produce an independent report on how to create a more open NHS culture," he said.
'Gold dust'
Katherine Murphy from the Patients Association said the NHS must demonstrate it is prepared to listen.
"Complaints are like gold dust - they should be welcomed, they are telling you something is not right."
Peter Walsh from the charity Action against Medical Accidents, said he valued the MPs' recommendations, but warned that progress had been too slow.
"This is just the latest in a long line of reports and we now demand action to improve what has been a failing system."
The former NHS whistleblower Dr Kim Holt, founder of the charity Patients First, said the report was a first step in making much-needed changes.
"I am really pleased that a suggestion has been made that historic whistleblower cases are looked at and practical ways found of providing redress for them. That is a really amazing step forward, but the system needs an overhaul.
"We no longer want to see people on long-term suspensions, sick leave or dismissed for speaking up. The link between bullying and raising concerns is a close one and our key issue to be addressed is the one of bullying, which creates fear and desperation."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Saturday, 3 January 2015

Whooping cough proteins evolving 'unusually' fast

Whooping cough proteins evolving 'unusually' fast


Baby having the DTP jab, which protects against whooping cough

Related Stories

Whooping cough may be evolving to outsmart the currently used vaccine, say researchers.
Analysis of strains from 2012 shows the parts of the pertussis bacterium that the vaccine primes the immune system to recognise are changing.
It may have "serious consequences" in future outbreaks, UK researchers state in the Journal of Infectious Diseases.
But experts stressed the vaccine remains highly effective in protecting the most vulnerable young babies.
There has been a global resurgence of whooping cough in recent years.
In 2012, there were almost 10,000 confirmed cases in England and Wales - a dramatic increase from the last "peak" of 900 cases in 2008.
The outbreak led to 14 deaths in babies under three months of age - the group who are most vulnerable to infection.
Rising figures prompted health officials to recommend vaccination of pregnant women so immunity could be passed to their newborns - a strategy that a recent study showed was working well.
Evolving strains
But there has been much debate among experts about whether the introduction of a new vaccine in 2004 has been a factor in rising rates of whooping cough.
One issue is that immunity from the newer acellular vaccine - which contains specific proteins from the surface of the bacteria - does not seem to last as long as the previous whole cell version, leaving teenagers and adults lacking protection.
In the latest study, researchers analysed the genes coding for the proteins on the surface of the pertussis bacterium responsible for the UK outbreak.
They found proteins being targeted by the vaccine were mutating at a faster rate than other surface proteins not included in the vaccine.
Potentially it means the bacteria is changing quickly to get around immune system's defences put in place with immunisation.
line
What is whooping cough?
Bordetella pertussis
It is also known as pertussis and is caused by a species of bacteria, Bordetella pertussis
It mostly affects infants, who are at highest risk of complications and even death
The earliest signs are similar to a common cold, then develop into a cough and can even result in pneumonia
Babies may turn blue while coughing due to a lack of oxygen
The cough tends to come in short bursts followed by desperate gasps for air (the whooping noise)
Adults can be infected - but the infection often goes unrecognised
line
But the researchers are still trying to work out what the changes mean in reality - for example do the mutations boost the ability of the bacteria to cause infection.
"We wanted to look at strains from the UK to see if there was anything sudden that had occurred that had led to these really large outbreaks," said study leader Dr Andrew Preston from the University of Bath.
Vaccine effectiveness
The "million dollar question" he said was what, if anything, could be done to improve the vaccine - which is still the best defence we have - and prevent future outbreaks.
Options to consider include adding more or different proteins to the vaccine, adding novel adjuvants - chemicals which boost the immune response, or even revisiting the old-style whole cell vaccine, he said.
"Pertussis has a cyclical nature and other big question is are we going to see another increase in late 2015," he added
Prof Adam Finn, a paediatric immunology expert at the University of Bristol said the importance - or not - of the subtle changes found in the study was as yet unclear.
"But the control of pertussis is a significant worry," he added.
Only 60% of pregnant women have had the pertussis vaccine and we should be doing more to raise awareness of its benefits, he said.
"There is very good new evidence that vaccinating pregnant women protects their babies. And the group we really want to protect is newborn babies," he said.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Learning disability GP health checks 'show results'

Learning disability GP health checks 'show results'

A GP checking a patient's blood pressure

Related Stories

A scheme getting GPs to offer health checks to patients with learning disabilities in England is helping to pick up problems, research suggests.
A study in Lancet Psychiatry, looking at data for more than 8,000 patients, found surgeries in the scheme were twice as likely to identify problems.
But many patients who are entitled to the checks are still missing out.
The Down's Syndrome Association said there was a lack of awareness that the health checks were available.
Learning disability health checks were introduced in 2008 through GPs surgeries as a way of monitoring the health of this vulnerable group of people.

Start Quote

We found that surgeries who did health checks did much better - they offered blood tests, reviewed the patients' medication, and drew up health action plans for the next year”
Andre StrydomUniversity College London
NHS England decided to pay GPs as part of an incentive scheme for carrying out the health checks.
People with learning or intellectual disabilities, such as Down's syndrome, are known to have significantly poorer health than other people.
This is because they find it more difficult to talk about symptoms and are less likely to make appointments to talk about their health problems.
'Barriers'
Lead researcher Andre Strydom, reader in intellectual disabilities at University College London, said there was good evidence that health checks for people with learning disabilities could help identify previously unrecognised health problems.
His study, comparing the results of health checks performed by GP surgeries who signed up to the scheme and those surgeries who did not, found that health concerns were picked up twice as often when surgeries got involved.
"We found that surgeries who did health checks did much better - they offered blood tests, reviewed the patients' medication, and drew up health action plans for the next year."
But even with six out of 10 surgeries signed up to the scheme in England, 40% of patients with learning disabilities did not receive a health check.
Dr Strydom said this may be owing to the fact that a large number of people with these disabilities were not on the list to receive a health check.
Either they were not known to local social services or their GP, or they were known but had been given the wrong patient code which meant they missed out when the list was collated, he said.
Stuart Mills, information officer at the Down's Syndrome Association, said there could be many reasons why this group of people were not being offered the health checks.
"It's a relatively complicated picture. It's down to a lack of awareness, not being on the disability register, and the fact there are more barriers for people with Down's syndrome."
He said the Association wanted to increase awareness that people with Down's syndrome were entitled to a health check.
The charity has also produced information booklets for GPs about potential health problems, which can include hearing and sight problems, thyroid conditions and muscular-skeletal problems. Depression is also a common health issue.
Although there was evidence some people were being given good health checks, others reported that their health checks were poor and lasted only 15 minutes, however.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Featured post

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants

More patients in Scotland given antidepressants 13 October 2015   From the section Scotland Image copyright Thinkstock Image ca...