19 and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)20
Received 21 April 2011; revised 2 June 2011; accepted 3 June 2011
1Department of Psychiatry, Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; 2Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building for Brain and Mind
Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK and 3MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
Correspondence: Dr MD Spencer, Department of Psychiatry, Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Road, Cambridge
Table 1 Main activations to happy and fearful versus neutral faces
MNI coordinates P-value
(FWE-corrected)
Z-score Cluster
size
Region
x y z kE (voxels)
Happy versus neutral faces
Control group
28 10 54 0.002 5.07 129 Left superior frontal gyrus
46 20 16 0.003 4.90 78 Right temporal pole
42 14 16 0.004 4.86 200 Left temporal pole
36 62 24 0.006 4.76 77 Left temporoparietal junction
54 64 10 0.009 4.66 115 Left posterior STS
44 52 28 0.010 4.65 60 Right FFA
4 26 54 0.012 4.60 64 Left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
66 28 2 0.015 4.54 32 Right middle STS
28 92 8 0.018 4.51 26 Right cuneus
62 52 4 0.026 4.41 26 Left middle STS
24 94 8 0.031 4.37 20 Left cuneus
Sibling group
Nil
Autism group
Nil
Fearful versus neutral faces
Control group
44 48 22 0.006 4.78 38 Right FFA
Sibling group
40 42 16 0.005 4.80 33 Right FFA
Autism group
Nil
Abbreviations: FFA, fusiform face area; FWE, family-wise error; MNI, Montreal Neuroimaging Institute; STS, superior temporal sulcus.
Activated brain regions, corresponding MNI coordinates, cluster sizes, Z-scores and P-values. All analyses are corrected for multiple comparisons, and P-values are
expressed following whole brain level FWE correction at the threshold of Po0.05.
A novel functional brain imaging endophenotype of autism
MD Spencer et al
3
Translational Psychiatry
We conducted analyses of variance within PASW Statistics
18 to measure the overall effect of group on the primary
contrast activation data (happy minus neutral and fearful
minus neutral) for each region of interest. Age and sex were
modeled as covariates in all analyses. Similarly, we used
analyses of variance to investigate autism versus control,
control versus sibling and autism versus sibling differences,
again taking age and sex as covariates. We investigated
linear trend effects across the three groups using polynomial
regression, and where a statistically significant linear effect
was found, we examined the quadratic effect to confirm that
this was nonsignificant. We plotted the mean activation
contrast estimate (expressed in arbitrary units±standard
error of the mean) for the three study groups.
To investigate whether the atypical response to happy
versus neutral faces was driven by an atypical response to
happy or neutral faces, or to both, we examined the response
to faces versus fixation crosses. First-level analysis was as
above, taking the primary contrasts as happy and neutral
faces versus fixation crosses. Second-level statistical analysis
proceeded as described above for the emotional versus
neutral contrasts.
Results
Neural response to facial expressions of emotion: happy
versus neutral faces. We examined the differential
response within the brain to happy compared with neutral
faces. In controls, happy faces elicited increased activation
compared with neutral faces (Figure 1 and Table 1) within a
range of areas strongly implicated in face processing,
empathy and mentalizing: the right (P¼0.003) and left
(P¼0.004) temporal poles, left temporoparietal junction
(P¼0.006), left posterior STS (P¼0.009), right FFA
(P¼0.010), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (P¼0.012) and
right (P¼0.015) and left (P¼0.026) middle STS. Increased
activation was also detected in the left superior frontal gyrus
(P¼0.002) and the right (P¼0.018) and left (P¼0.031)
cuneus. All P-values are expressed following correction for
multiple comparisons on a whole-brain level FWE basis. In
contrast, no activation differences were detected within
sibling and autism groups at the threshold of Po0.05 FWE
corrected.
To investigate biomarkers of familial risk compared with
autism versus control differences, we examined betweengroup
differences in the fMRI response in autism, sibling and
control participants within the specific brain regions identified
above as being significantly activated in controls to happy
versus neutral faces (listed in Table 1). For all 11 brain
regions, activation was significantly reduced in autism
compared with controls, with siblings demonstrating an
intermediate degree of impairment.
Activation in siblings was significantly reduced compared
with controls for 7 of the 11 brain regions: the left superior
frontal gyrus (P¼0.001; F¼11.664), the right (P¼0.002;
F¼9.986) and left (P¼0.005; F¼8.551) temporal poles, the
right middle (P¼0.004; F¼9.068) and left posterior
(P¼0.016; F¼6.064) STS, the left dorsomedial prefrontal
cortex (P¼0.005; F¼8.570) and the right FFA (P¼0.044;
F¼4.184) (univariate analyses of variance, covarying for age
and sex; Figures 1 and 2). Furthermore, for all 11 regions,
activation in the autism group was significantly reduced
compared with controls, the effect of group was significant
across all the three groups, and polynomial regression linear
contrast effects across all the three groups were significant
Middle
STS
Temporal
pole
FFA
-28 -16 +2
4.6
4.8
5.2
5.0
Superior DMPFC
frontal
Cuneus
Left Right
Posterior
STS
TPJ
P = 0.001 P = 0.002 P = 0.004
+10
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
-0.1
autism sibling control
autism sibling control
autism sibling control
autism sibling control autism sibling control
autism sibling control autism sibling control
autism sibling control autism sibling control
autism sibling control autism sibling control
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.4
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.1
0.2
0.0
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.0
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
+24 +54
P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
Left superior
frontal gyrus
Right temporal pole Right middle STS
Left posterior
STS
Left DMPFC Left temporal pole
P = 0.005
P < 0.001
P = 0.016
P = 0.002
P = 0.005
P < 0.001
Right FFA Left middle STS
P = 0.044
P < 0.001
P = 0.003 P = 0.007
P < 0.001 P = 0.001
Left cuneus
Left TPJ Right cuneus
Figure 1 Neural response to happy versus neutral faces. Activation differences
(means±s.e.m.) between the functional magnetic resonance imaging response to
happy and neutral faces in adolescents with autism (n¼40), unaffected siblings
(n¼40) and controls (n¼40). Activation map indicates neural response to happy
versus neutral faces in controls, and shows activations to happy versus neutral
faces (Po0.05, FWE corrected) overlaid onto the canonical Montreal Neurological
Institute (MNI) 152 template brain image (axial section, z-coordinate indicated in
Montreal Neurological Institute space), with the colored bar indicating the T-value of
the plotted activation differences. DMPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; FFA,
fusiform face area; STS, superior temporal sulcus; TPJ, temporoparietal junction.
A novel functional brain imaging endophenotype of autism
MD Spencer et al
4
Translational Psychiatry
with no significant quadratic component. For all 11 regions,
activation in the autism group did not differ statistically
significantly from activation in siblings (Table 2).
Neural response to facial expression of emotion: fearful
versus neutral faces. In controls and in siblings, fearful
faces elicited increased activation compared with neutral
faces (Figure 3 and Table 1) within the right FFA (controls:
P¼0.006, siblings P¼0.005; FWE corrected). However, the
autism group did not display any significant activation
differences at the threshold Po0.05 FWE corrected.
As with the happy versus neutral analyses above, we
examined between-group differences in the fMRI response in
autism, sibling and control participants within the right FFA,
characterized above as the brain region significantly activated
in controls in fearful versus neutral faces. Activation in the
autism group was significantly reduced compared with
controls and a significant polynomial regression linear
contrast effect with no significant quadratic component was
detected across all the three groups (Figure 3 and Table 2).
However, activation in the sibling group did not differ
significantly from activation in controls or the autism group.
Neural response to faces versus fixation crosses. These
findings demonstrate a clear linear progression across
autism, sibling and control groups for atypical fMRI
activation to happy versus neutral faces. To address the
question as to whether the neural basis for this marker is an
atypical neural response to happy faces, neutral faces or to
both, we used the same brain regions defined by the
significant activations within controls to happy versus
neutral faces (comprising the 11 clusters listed in Table 1)
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
autism sibling
Middle STS Superior frontal
gyrus
Right Left
Temporal pole Temporal pole
control autism sibling control
autism sibling control autism sibling control
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
-0.1
contrast estimate +/- SE
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
-0.1
-0.2
contrast estimate +/- SE
P = 0.004 P = 0.001
P = 0.005
P < 0.001
P < 0.001 P < 0.001
P < 0.001
P = 0.002
Figure 2 Differences between ‘unaffected’ siblings and controls with no family history of autism in the neural response to happy versus neutral faces. Activation differences
(means±s.e.m.) between the functional magnetic resonance imaging response to happy and neutral faces in adolescents with autism (n¼40), unaffected siblings (n¼40)
and controls (n¼40). Activation map corrected for multiple comparisons at Po0.05 family-wise error corrected, and overlaid onto a three-dimensional-rendered template
brain within MRIcron. STS, superior temporal sulcus.
Table 2 Between-group differences in activations to emotional versus neutral faces
Region of significant activation
in controls
Between-group differences
P-value (F-statistic)
Effect of group
(across all three groups)
Polynomial regression
linear trend effect
Control versus
sibling
Control
versus
autism
Sibling versus
autism
P-value
(F statistic)
P-value
Happy versus neutral faces
Left superior frontal gyrus 0.001 (11.664) o0.001 (17.222) NS o0.001 (9.448) o0.001
Right temporal pole 0.002 (9.986) o0.001 (13.703) NS o0.001 (8.994) o0.001
Richard Benyon: a "fantastic achievement" that will help the IWC to modernise
The International Whaling Commission (IWC) has approved measures designed to prevent past "cash for votes" scandals from happening again.
Countries will have to pay membership fees by bank transfer from government accounts, enabling traceability.
Previously, delegates have been able to turn up and pay in cash.
Observers were pleased the measures passed, though some were dismayed that plans to give non-governmental groups a bigger role were discarded.
Deliberations on the package - proposed by the UK - took an entire day out of the four scheduled for this meeting, and were eventually passed by consensus.
"This is a fantastic achievement that will modernise the IWC, bringing it in to line with other important international bodies, and give it real credibility," said UK Environment Minister Richard Benyon.
"We have been working on these proposals for a year and it is a credit to the UK that we have had them passed without needing a vote."
The measures should also improve communication, with meeting reports issued within two months rather than up to a year, as currently, and more information publicly available on the IWC's website. Cash memory
We've seen how fanatical and irresponsible some NGOs can be”
End QuoteOle SamsingDanish IWC commissioner
But the most controversial element proved to be the money.
Several developing country delegations said their governments tended to provide money only a few days before meetings began, so bank transfer meant the money would arrive after the meeting had begun.
Delegations are unable to vote until fees have been paid.
A number argued for the use of bankers' drafts instead. This was received with some scepticism by some western observers, who believed some delegations were trying to maintain the capacity to pass on funds from a third party easily, as bankers' drafts are anonymous.
Eventually a compromise was found, enabling the IWC secretariat to accredit delegates if it is sure that payment has been initiated.
There were different views about what should replace the cash payments that some nations use
Daven Joseph, the IWC commissioner for St Kitts and Nevis, said he regretted the amount of time spent on these discussions but it had been necessary.
"We have been establishing the rules of procedure, and we have to be very careful in how those rules are established," he told BBC News.
"In some of our countries, whaling has never been given a top priority when it comes to accessing funds from the treasury."
Environmental groups said they were generally pleased that the measures had passed.
"This is a good day for whales and the commission established to protect them; everyone wins," said Patrick Ramage, director of the Global Whale Programme of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw).
"These rule changes represent real progress as the IWC migrates into the 21st Century - a closed whalers' club is becoming a more credible commission, promoting whale conservation not commercial whaling." Europe's split
However, Mr Ramage and many of his peers were disappointed that proposals to give non-governmental organisations (NGOs) more involvement in the IWC's formal discussions, as they have in many other international institutions, fell along the way.
Currently, six people from the NGO community - three from the pro-whaling side, and three of their opponents - are allowed to speak for five minutes each.
This component was jettisoned before the main negotiations began, a casualty of internal European Union discussions.
All EU members except Denmark supported greater NGO involvement.
But the European Commission wants to have the bloc act in unison where possible; and the UK agreed that having the proposal put forward as an EU document would give it more leverage.
But the only way to get the Danes on board was to abandon the section on NGOs. In the IWC, Denmark represents not itself, but Greenland, a whaling territory.
Earlier in the day, Danish whaling commissioner Ole Samsing had explained his opposition by referring to the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, which is barred from the IWC meeting but which has been holding demonstrations outside.
"We've seen how fanatical and irresponsible some NGOs can be," he told delegates.
"I know they're not accredited to this organisation, but nevertheless they're representing some radical point of view so there is a reason for restricted treatment of NGOs here."
The great irony of this process was that in the end the proposal could not be admitted as an EU document on procedural grounds, as the EU is not a member of the commission.
Patients whose care switches between doctors, hospitals and other care providers run the risk of getting the wrong medicine or the wrong dose of medicine, according to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. The society has launched a campaign to get patients – as well as doctors and other health professionals – to keep better records of the drugs they are taking and make sure carers are aware of them.
What is the problem?
The Royal Pharmaceutical Society warns that between 30% and 70% of patients have an error or unintended change to their medicines when their care is transferred from, say, a GP to a hospital or between hospitals.
Why is this a problem?
Getting the wrong medicine or the wrong dose of the right medicine can sometimes be harmful. The health regulator, the Care Quality Commission, says that about 4-5% of hospital admissions are due to avoidable mistakes with medicines. There are cases of people who have died as a result of being given the wrong doses of medicine after transferring between different care providers.
How can I, or my carer, can make sure I get the right medication?
If you have any doubts about your medicines ask a doctor or other healthcare professional for help, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society advises. If you do not understand what the doctor tells you, ask them to explain it more simply.
It’s also best to keep all medicines together in a safe place and make sure that you do not keep old out-of-date medicines.
How can I make sure that my medicines don’t change if I move between hospitals?
If you move from one place to another, make sure you take your list of medicines with you and if possible use a single container to keep all your packets or bottles of medicine together. In hospital, a doctor, nurse, or other healthcare professional should check your medicines within 24 hours of you arriving – ask someone for help if this doesn’t happen.
What happens when I leave hospital with new or different medicine?
Before you leave hospital, ask for your medicines to be explained to you, especially if there have been any changes to your medicine. You should ask for written or printed information so that you can remind yourself of the medicines or changes later.
Is there anything I should do after I have left hospital?
The next time you see your GP, check that they know about the changes to your medicines. You could also ask your local pharmacist for a “medicines use review” to help you better understand your medicines.
Scientists are embarking on a two-month expedition in the Pacific aimed at finding ways to reduce the damaging accidental toll of tuna fishing.
They want to find techniques that help fishermen find the abundant skipjack tuna without also catching sharks, turtles, or threatened tuna species.
The scientists will sail on board a tuna purse-seine vessel from Ecuador.
Knowledge gained on the trip will be used to develop fishing techniques or new gear that are much more selective.
This could entail fishing at different times of day, at specific depths under the waves, or by more targeted use of fish aggregating devices (FADs).
"The overall objective is to explore some potential options for reducing the mortality of bigeye tunas and other 'undesirable' species while maximising catches of skipjack," said research leader Kurt Schaefer.
"We're looking for ways in which we can learn to harvest the skipjack without impacting other species such as bigeye and yellowfin - we're not yet testing what we consider to be practical solutions," he told BBC News.
Dr Schaefer has been a research scientist with the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) - one of the bodies charged with regulating tuna fishing in the open sea - for more than 30 years.
While the small, fecund skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) forms the basis of the canned tuna industry, the bigeye (Thunnus obesus) is an endangered species in the Pacific, primarily because of fishing.
The cruise departed from Ecuador on Tuesday, using the chartered commercial fishing vessel Yolanda L. Modern FADs
New models of FAD could in future separate different species of tuna, and other fish
For reasons that are not entirely clear, fish and other marine creatures tend to congregate around floating objects such as logs.
Fishermen have learned to take advantage of this, deploying buoys - FADs - equipped with GPS and sonar.
When the sonar senses that fish have gathered, the buoy signals the parent vessel, which steams alongside to collect its haul.
Using a purse seine net, the boat can encircle and capture the entire shoal.
The scientists hope that understanding what makes various species move towards the FAD and then leave it again could open doors to fishing selectively.
This combination of research, training and management is necessary if we want to make these fisheries more sustainable”
End QuoteVictor RestrepoISSF scientific advisor
"One of the things we're doing is behavioural studies using acoustic tags and telemetry," said Dr Schaefer.
"We'll be tagging these species, and trying to see whether there are times when you see separation eithed horizontally or vertically in the water, and whether you could use this to separate out catches.
"We'll also be looking for times of day at which the species might naturally separate - times when the skipjack, for example, might move away from the FAD."
Smaller species may be trying to shelter from predators, while bigger ones may see it as an easy source of food.
The various species may also be attracted away by different signals, such as water temperatures.
A remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) will be deployed to film fish behaviour around the FAD, and after entrapment in the purse seine net.
If different tuna species separate inside the net - some swimming high and others low, for example - that could also form the basis of a separation method. Local knowledge
Having spent long periods at sea on fishing vessels, Kurt Schaefer believes experienced skippers may already know ways of targeting skipjack.
The scientists will analyse how well the Yolanda L's skipper is able to predict catches.
An underwater ROV (here being tested) will be deployed to film tuna in the nets
This research cruise is an initiative of the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), which brings scientists together with people from the seafood industry and from environmental groups.
It is the first of a number of cruises planned for different parts of the world's oceans.
Victor Restrepo, chairman of ISSF's scientific advisory committee, said the broader project aims to replicate what has already been achieved in some other fisheries by combining expertise held by fishermen with scientific findings.
"We are sharing what we learn with with skippers through workshops where scientists and fishers exchange ideas on these and other potential techniques," he said.
"And we are working with policymakers in the governments of countries with important purse seine fisheries so that they adopt regulations to implement these techniques.
"I believe that this combination of research, training and management is necessary if we want to make these fisheries more sustainable."
Whereas some environmental groups argue for the abandonment of FADs, the ISSF believes this is neither feasible nor desirable.
"It's the philosophy of ISSF and our partners that abandoning a fishery will not help to improve it," said ISSF president Susan Jackson, previously of food giants Del Monte and Heinz.
"We must help to improve practices that make fishing for tuna more sustainable."
The bluefin - the most talked about tuna species recently, and the most prized for sushi - is not a factor in this cruise.
Japan intends to send its whaling fleet back to the Antarctic this year, a senior official has told BBC News.
There has been speculation that campaigns by activists, money problems and new rules at sea might persuade Tokyo to stop Antarctic whaling.
But at the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting, Japan's Joji Morishita said the plan was to return.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, which forced the last hunt's early closure, says it will be back too.
Finding a way to deal with the organisation's vessels is the main obstacle Japan sees to continuing for the next season and beyond.
"We are now discussing how we can send our fleet back to the Antarctic Ocean," said Mr Morishita, Japan's deputy commissioner to the IWC and a senior official in the Fisheries Agency.
"Simply put, the attack from Sea Shepherd organisation is the one we have to consider how we prevent that to happen again."
During the IWC meeting, being held in Jersey, Japanese delegates showed pictures and videos that, they said, showed the campaigners attacking whaling vessels with projectiles including flares, which set netting alight, and glass bottles filled with foul-smelling butyric acid.
They also showed Sea Shepherd boats ramming the whalers, and said reinforced ropes had been put in the water to entangle propellers.
"The attack this past year became so severe that we didn't have any choice to try to prevent the worst from happening," said Mr Morishita.
Each successive year, Sea Shepherd has sent bigger fleets and faster vessels, while Japan has downscaled its forces; last season, for the first time, the activists had the upper hand.
Rather than catching 850-odd whales - the official target - the eventual haul was about 170.
It is not clear how Japan intends to protect its fleet in any future expedition - it was not just a matter of sending military patrols, Mr Morishita said, as that was a legal minefield.
Demonstrating force
A further obstacle Japan faces is that, from next year, new regulations on maritime pollution mean the Nisshin Maru, its factory ship, will not be permitted in Antarctic waters with tanks full of heavy fuel oil without a refit.
Another is financial. Japan's national budget was in trouble even before the impact of the recent earthquake and tsunami; and with sales of whalemeat falling, the cost of the hunt is rising.
But Mr Morishita suggested all of these issues would be easier to overcome than Sea Shepherd's opposition.
Some observers have suggested that Japan sees blaming Sea Shepherd as a way to escape from Southern Ocean whaling without losing face.
Mr Morishita said this was not the case, and the basic policy remained unchanged.
Sea Shepherd activists have staged demonstrations outside the IWC meeting here - the organisation is barred from attending - and it is clear that it will send its fleet to the Southern Ocean again if Japan does return.
"Sea Shepherd will also return and will once again intercept and block their operations," the organisation's head Paul Watson wrote on his blog earlier this week.
"If they return, we will launch Operation Divine Wind, and our vessels the Bob Barker, the Steve Irwin, and the Brigitte Bardot will soon return to the remote and stormy seas of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary to do what we do best - defend the whales!"
GM animals and "harmful mutant" animals largely account for the rise
The number of animal experiments carried out in the UK rose by 3% last year, according to government figures.
The rise was largely due to an increase in the use of genetically modified (GM) and mutant animals, a trend which shows no signs of abating.
The news comes as campaigners warn a new EU directive threatens standards of welfare for UK lab animals.
They argue that a number of the directive's regulations fall short of those already in place in the UK.
Just over 3.7 million scientific experiments on animals were started in Great Britain in 2010, an increase of 105,000 on the previous year.
The statistics show that breeding to produce genetically modified (GM) animals and harmful mutants (an animal with potentially harmful genetic defects) rose by 87,000 to 1.6 million procedures.
This rise, largely due to the increased breeding of mice and fish, represents an increase of 6%.
But when GM animals are excluded from the statistics, the total number of procedures rose by 18,000, from 2.09 million to 2.10 million.
Home Office minister Lynn Featherstone commented: "The figures released today once again show the important work being done in this country to regulate animal procedures and ensure the highest standards of animal protection are upheld.
"The UK has one of the most rigorous systems in the world to ensure that animal research and testing is strictly regulated."
Some 400 hectares of maize found to have been grown with genetically modified seeds have been destroyed throughout Hungary deputy state secretary of the Ministry of Rural Development Lajos Bognar said.
The GMO maize has been ploughed under, said Lajos Bognar, but pollen has not spread from the maize, he added. Unlike several EU members, GMO seeds are banned in Hungary.
Authorities have been checking for GMO crops since the beginning of this year as a new regulation came in force this March which stipulates GMO checks before seeds are introduced to the market.
The checks will continue despite the fact that seed traders are obliged to make sure that their products are GMO free, Bognar said.
Compensation unlikely
Controllers have found Pioneer and Monsanto products among the seeds planted. The free movement of goods within the EU means that authorities will not investigate how the seeds arrived in Hungary but they will check where the goods can be found, Bognar said.
Regional public radio reported that the two biggest international seed producing companies are affected in the matter and GMO seeds could have been sown on up to thousands of hectares in the country.
Local farmers complain that the use of GMO seeds has only been revealed now when it is too late to sow again and the entire year's harvest has been lost.
Another problem is that the company that distributed the seeds in Baranya county is under liquidation, therefore if any compensation is paid by the international seed producers, the money will be paid primarily to that company's creditors, rather than the farmers.
Care home operator Southern Cross is set to shut down after landlords owning all 752 of its care homes said they wanted to leave the group.
"It is currently envisaged that the existing group will cease to be an operator of homes," the firm said.
Southern Cross added that the landlords were still committed to providing continuity of care to its 31,000 residents.
Trading in the company's shares has been suspended.
The Darlington-based Southern Cross and its landlords and creditors are a month into a four-month restructuring period, which was agreed in crisis talks in June.
The statement said that the details of the restructuring were not yet settled and there was still a possibility of further changes.
It had been expected that some of the landlords would leave the group, leaving Southern Cross operating with between 250 and 400 homes, but now it appears that the group is to disappear altogether.
Ministers have been quick to promise that Southern Cross residents will not be turfed out on to the street.
But that does not mean that these vulnerable people are not facing a great deal of uncertainty and, potentially, upheaval.
The hope now is that the group will be broken up into chunks for other providers to take on.
If that happens the new owners may still want to close some of the homes - something that everyone agrees is both distressing and damaging for the health of those involved.
But the Southern Cross developments raise wider questions about the whole sector.
While the problems the group has faced have been linked to its business model, the situation has been further compounded by cuts in fees paid by councils.
Last year alone fees paid by local authorities for state-funded care home residents were cut by about 2.5% once inflation was taken account.
Suffice to say, the squeeze has been felt across the industry - not just by Southern Cross. It is getting increasingly tough to keep services going.
'Regret'
The process began when the UK's biggest care home operator said it was unable to pay its rent bills to its landlords.
The statement said that little or no value would be left for the shareholders.
"We regret the loss of value which shareholders have experienced," Southern Cross chairman Christopher Fisher said.
About 250 of the homes will immediately begin to be transferred to other operators.
The owners of the rest of the homes are still finalising their plans, but they may end up using the existing Southern Cross back-office staff and some of its management.
'Worrying' time
"We anticipate that the period of uncertainty which we have been experiencing will now draw to a close," Mr Fisher added.
But Michelle Mitchell at Age UK, said that despite the promises about continuity of care, "this has been a really worrying few months for Southern Cross residents and their families, with these latest developments only adding to their concern".
Labour MP John Mann called on the government to intervene to make sure that care home residents were not forced to move.
"No resident should be forced to move out of their home and in the big sell-off there must be no cherry picking of the better properties," said Mr Mann, who has four Southern Cross homes in his constituency.
"Government intervention is needed now so that resident needs are put first and to prevent an even greater disaster from unfolding."
Fee question
Martin Green, chief executive of the English Community Care Association, said the collapse of Southern Cross showed there were serious problems with the funding of care in the independent sector.
"I think the Southern Cross issue which has come to a head today, is very much an issue that other providers are facing because of the levels of resource that they have to deliver care on," he told BBC Radio 4's You and Yours programme.
"Fees are a really big issue and we've had several years of nil increases, and of course we've had inflation rates running at 4-5%."
David Rogers, chairman of the Local Government Association's Community Wellbeing Board, said: "Councils take the welfare of care home residents extremely seriously and throughout this process that has always been their priority."
"It's greatly reassuring, and testament to the good work which has been going on behind the scenes and the resilience of the care home system, that a solution has been found which will hopefully avoid major upheaval for the vulnerable people involved."